*** Important comprehensive update of the Zundel Holocaust Heresy
Trial***
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Thu Jun 15 12:27:54 EDT 2006
To our friends around the world:
As promised, here is an update about the Mannheim Holocaust Heresy
Trial hearing on June 9, 2006:
Eleven new hearing dates have been set! Please mark your calendar!
June 21
June 23
June 30
July 3
July 20
July 21
July 28 (? Not sure about this one!)
August 4
September 1
September 22
September 29
All hearings start at 9:00 A.M - except for July 3rd which starts at 10:00 A.M.
Many of our supporters were horrified at the time this political show
trial is taking - the feeling being that the government's intent is
to drain us of our defense funds by spreading out the dates and
wasting them with trivia. Also, it means that media will lose
interest, as will the audience - many of whom come at great personal
sacrifice of comfort and money. The meat of the matter hasn't even
been touched - namely the fraudulent Holocaust claims, scientifically
debunked already for decades, that neither Ernst nor his attorneys
are allowed to offer in his defense!
Of course I am only guessing, since Ernst is not even allowed to
communicate anything substantial about the trial itself, but it seems
to me that Ernst is not overly upset. The days spent in
investigative detention will be subtracted from the judgment which,
according to the feedback I am getting, will go against him and is,
in an "Allied"-controlled country like Germany, already a foregone
conclusion.
Everybody tells me that under the present, Soviet-style system, there
is no way that Ernst can win. Not only is he prevented from
defending himself with solid facts against the judicial Holocaust
Protection Racket - Par. 130 - the defense attorneys themselves are
at peril of being charged, fined and/or otherwise punished by
proffering those facts!
Welcome to the New World Order - in Europe!
So you can easily see that this trial exposes the camouflaged
occupational dictatorship still locked in place in Germany - this
after some 60-plus years!
Why then continue to fight? Well, as before - with this trial
against a high-profile political dissident, the state supplies a
megaphone with which to broadcast its own corruption. Therefore, we
carry on.
I also feel that the longer this trial continues, the more chances we
have to get meaningful action in parallel trials. For one, Germar
Rudolf's trial is coming up, as is Siegfried Verbeke's. David
Irving's case, I understand, is heading for appeal. And there are
other juicy trials and appeals in full view of the public, such as
the appeal by Ursula Haverbeck, a most distinguished lady editor who
wrote one of the finest and crispest Revisionist summaries addressed
to the appeal court that I have ever read.
(Unfortunately for most of you, it is in German - and translators
from German to English are few and far between. If somebody can do a
translation, please contact me! I am bewitched by what that lady
wrote in lucid and elegant prose! How there can still be judges in
Germany able to face themselves in the mirror after arguments like
those by Ursula Haverbeck is beyond me!)
From my perspective, at least there is a chance that the main issue
just can't be avoided forever, what with the prosecution's
tap-dancing like the proverbial cat on the hot tin roof! The longer
this trial proceeds, the better chance there is that ever more people
are going to get alerted to the abominable Par. 130 that shields the
Holocaust Lobby and prevents legitimate and conscientious historical
research. Assuming that our supporter front holds - I say that the
outcome is still far from decided!
=====
But back to June 9th. From various sources I stitch the following together:
The defense team was present in full force. Media presence was
moderate, compared to the first few days. Security had been reduced
to 10 guards - I guess the initial show of force ( about triple the
current one ) to keep an audience of mostly somber senior citizens in
soft loafers in check looked just a little bit too silly!
Present also were about 60 supporters - along with a class made up of
teenagers who were given preferential seating in chairs reserved for
the press, much to the annoyance of the discriminated Zundelists.
When Ernst arrived, there was again applause - even though forbidden
by Judge Meinerzhagen, and the "offenders" had to hand over their ID
s to the guards. One of my Zgram readers gave me a tip beforehand
suggesting that the audience ought to only pretend to applaud - to
dare the judge to forbid even pro-Zundel hand movements! I didn't
have the heart to pass it on - I merely plan to reserve it for my
still-in-the-planning stages, large screen feature movie! That
moment of creative hilarity will be preserved - assuredly - for
audiences to come!
One supporter was escorted out of the room for some "offense" that
was later termed "a mistake." He was back, undaunted, in the
afternoon and was permitted to stay.
Again, the defense presented a motion to have Judge Meinerzhagen
excuse himself for bias - I am not sure on what specific point. As
before, that request was dismissed as being irrelevant. Attorney
Rieger next complained that the defense was not given sufficient
insight into documents. Again, his request was dismissed.
Then came the highlight of the day - the government's Star Witness, a
woman who had been at least part of the "Head Hunters Dream Team" to
deport or extradite the venerable Mr. Zundel. Her name is Sabine
Kuhl, age 31 - in other words, barely out of diapers when Ernst
fought his first Holocaust Trial. Her title is a mouthful -
"Kriminaloberkommissarin" - a title that speaks volumes. I shall
shorten it to Kommissar Kuhl.
Kommissar Kuhl claims that she was only involved in the Zundel matter
since February 2003, tasked by the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA, an outfit
similar to our FBI) to get her hands on Zundel - which, so her
testimony went, was a bit difficult since Zundel, somehow delivered
by mix-up or intent to Canada instead of Germany, immediately asked
for Canadian asylum.
From what I gathered by speaking to supporters who were present in
the courtroom, she testified that the USA had been "unwilling" to
hand Ernst over to the "Bundesrepublik" directly, which evidently
threw a monkey wrench into a surreptitious plan.
A German arrest warrant dating from 1991 had meanwhile expired - a
new one had to be sworn out on the run! Now that Ernst was in
Canada, held as a "security risk" in "Guantanamo North", the eager
beaver BKA officials were forced to chew their nails. For two long
years, the Zundel lawyers fought the looming "deportation" threat
while Ernst was being tortured half to death, held captive on
starvation rations in isolation in an ice cold cell where the light
was never turned off.
In the end, bureaucratic endurance won out on both sides of the
ocean. The Grand Day came, as we all know - and on February 22, 2005
it was clear that the Security Certificate allowed the spiriting away
of one of the world's most famous dissidents and foes of the
Holocaust Lobby. This last act was accomplished by luxury plane at
Canadian taxpayers' expense on March 1, 2005 to avoid a last minute
snare by regular Frankfurt Airport customs officials who would have
insisted on a current passport, withheld by mutual agreement of at
least three governments - Germany, Canada, and our venerable USA. At
the airport, waiting, was the illustrious Kommissar Kuhl to take her
price catch deftly into custody. I saw it on American TV.
=====
At this point, apparently, some drama ensued. Judge Meinerzhagen
asked Kommissar Kuhl that the correspondence involving the BKA and
Washington, D.C. be kept "in the foreground."
Was it not true, he asked, that someone in Germany desperately wanted
that deportation - if not extradition? Just how, exactly, was that
done?
Here is what Kommissar Kuhl said, in essence, Please be aware that I
am paraphrasing:
Kommissar Kuhl: Part of the problem was that Mr. Zundel would have
needed a new passport, had regular channels been utilized. The BKA
wanted to deny him a passport - he could have been arrested [by
Customs?] because his old one had expired!
Judge Meinerzhagen: Why, first, to Canada?
The answer to that was not clear. ( "Kuhl started to swerve," as
one supporter put it. )
Attorney Rieger: Did there exist a German-Canadian agreement for deportation?
Kommissar Kuhl: Well, no. We did send on the expired arrest warrant
from 1991.
Judge Meinerzhagen: Was there an official deportation request?
Kommissar Kuhl: No. Neither in the USA or Canada. The Foreign
Ministry in Berlin was worried about political fallout. The BKA and
the then Attorney General Klein had thought it wise to wait for the
result of the Canadian court proceedings. It was not necessary to
request a deportation/extradition, since Zundel's actions [namely
questioning the Holocaust and thereby hurting the feelings of the
Jews] were considered punishable in Canada.
(Ingrid's comment: This is a slimy way of admitting that Canada had
to "criminalize" Ernst Zundel first, by swearing out the Security
Certificate - so that there was a reason to deliver him to Kuhl and
Co. in Germany!)
Judge Meinerzhagen. Was there an attempt to send Mr. Zundel back to
the USA - or to Germany? Did the BKA know about the charges of the
Canadian government against Mr. Zundel?
Kommissar Kuhl: We knew nothing about this.
Judge Meinerzhagen: What happened prior to the deportation of Mr. Zundel?
Kommissar Kuhl: No investigation. No action.
Judge Meinerzhagen: What other countries were considered for Mr.
Zundel to be sent to?
Kommissar Kuhl: The BKA does not know what the USA intended.
Judge Meinerzhagen: Was the Foreign Ministry involved in the deportation?
Kommissar Kuhl: I cannot answer that. I only know about contacts
via [Embassies? Consulates?] of countries. They received the
necessary information as well as medication against high blood
pressure and vitamins. Zundel was allowed to call his attorney and
his sister.
Judge Meinerzhagen: Mr. Zundel had the status of a landed immigrant
without citizenship, although he had unlimited permission to live in
Canada. He went voluntarily to the U.S. where he continued to send
out his Power and Germania letters. His marriage to Mrs. Ingrid
Rimland followed, who was running the Zundelsite.
Kommissar Kuhl: Regarding concrete statements about the reason for
the arrest by U.S. officials I am not in a position to comment.
Defense Attorney Rieger: It is known that the BKA has contact with
the Canadian Secret service, CSIS.
Kommissar Kuhl: (avoids comment)
Defense Attorney Rieger: Mrs. Kuhl, are you aware that in March [of
this year] two members of the Canadian Secret Service were present
during court?
Kommissar Kuhl: No.
Defense Attorney Rieger: The tape of the broadcast out of Königsberg
is said to have been delivered [to the BKA] by CSIS.
Kommissar Kuhl: (stutters, avoiding a clear answer.)
Defense Attorney Rieger: Who, besides you, had to do with these
matters? The tape was handed to the BKA by CSIS. There existed or
exists close contact with the BKA.
Kommissar Kuhl: I am not sure. I can try to find out.
Defense attorney Rieger: A CSIS liaison in Moscow arranged for this
[Zundel radio show] to be canceled.
Judge Meinerzhagen: In Volume 12 under CSIS 104, recorded and signed
by Kriminalkommissar Kölsch.
Kommissar Kuhl: Regarding the deliveries by Irene (Ernst's ex-wife
who defected to his enemies after their separation and offered to be
deposed against him] - most of what she said was already known - and
uninteresting.
Judge Meinerzhagen: Does the BKA consider Irene reliable?
Kommissar Kuhl: According to a note by Kommissar Kölsch, there was
no interest in her testimony after 1998/99.
Judge Meinerzhagen: Please, let's return to the topic.
Defense Attorney Schaller: The documents ought to contain
investigations from the Internet.
Kommissar Kuhl: They are in File Folder D.
Defense Attorney Schaller. The USA and Canada could have found all
the information on the Internet. They did not need Irene. What was
delivered by Mrs. Binsdorf? [Ingrid's comment: I don't know who she
is or even if the name is spelled right.]
Kommissar Kuhl: That's in the documents. That is in the file folders.
Defense Attorney Schaller: Even the Munich judgment of 1991?
Kommissar Kuhl: It could not be concluded from the documents that
Mr. Zundel was involved in the White Supremacy Movement. That's not
what we were trying to establish.
Defense Attorney Rieger. Already two days before the decision in
Toronto [regarding deportation] there was news about the outcome.
Did Ernst Zundel wish to go to another country - Ireland, Sweden,
Iran?
Kommissar Kuhl: In Germany there was only talk about a stay in Canada.
Defense Attorney Rieger: Were other BKA officials involved in
preventing a deportation to a third country? There were other
possibilities. Was the official in question from the BKA or from the
BND? [Bundesnachrichtendienst, Germany's spy agency, much like CSIS]
Kommissar Kuhl: We haven't worked together directly with the BND. I
wouldn't know who that could be.
Defense Attorney Rieger: Are you aware that the Canadians asked for
media silence until Ernst Zundel was delivered to the German
officials? Did you coordinate the press release with the Canadian
side?
Kommissar Kuhl: Only with the German consulates and embassies. We
did not have direct contact with CSIS.
Defense Attorney Rieger: With which persons?
Kommissar Kuhl: [No comment.]
Defense Attorney Rieger: Are there any other charges against Mr. Zundel?
Kommissar Kuhl: As far as I know, and what I can see here in my notes - No.
Defense Attorney Rieger: Who, before you, was in charge of this investigation?
Kommissar: [Names someone. Not clear]
Judge Meinerzhagen: Who was in charge of checking the Zundelsite?
Who gave the order?
Kommissar Kuhl: It was given by Attorney General Klein.
Judge Meinerzhagen? How was it done?
Kommissar Kuhl: The layout changed. Texts were in various languages
- German, English and others - not all of them complete. According
to Paragraph 130, some of them were punishable, some of them were
not. There were submissions from Samisdat, mirror sites, German
articles and headlines.
Judge Meinerzhagen: Was the search through keywords "Zundelsite"?
Were there references? Links?
At this point the prosecution and defense busied themselves with
checking documents on the judge's desk. The audience could no longer
follow.
Please, once again: Above, I was stitching together what happened on
June 9th from various sources. Since Germany does not allow
transcripts, this is the best that I can do to convey to my readers
what happened.
The hearing was concluded at 4:15 P.M. I have been told that
Kommissar Kuhl will be back on the stand when the trial resumes.
Who, besides me, is on tiptoes?
=====
Additional Comment:
A clarification is in order about Ernst's passport. It was indeed
expired, but there is no law that says that Ernst would have to renew
it. He tried once, and was told by a German Consul (friendly to us)
on the West Coast that if he tried, he would only be given a one-day,
one way passport. The Consul hinted it would be foolish to try. I
know this for a fact, because I was the one who approached him with
this question at a private social gathering one sunny Sunday
afternoon.
So it is true that Ernst did not have a valid passport. However, he
was in Adjustment of Status proceedings. He had INS permission to
work in the U.S.; he was given a social security number, a health
check; he paid taxes in the U.S.; he had a document issued by the
Justice Department that permitted him to leave the U.S. and return,
unmolested.
The lack of passport issue, referenced below, merely shows that it
merely worried the German lackeys. How to get him through German
customs if and when deportation became a reality - without all media
hell breaking loose?
Remember also, Ernst Zundel has copies of some 150 lbs of documents
that show enormous, costly behind-the-scenes machinations by his
political enemies to seize and neutralize him - by hook and by crook,
by faking a threadbare "deportation". Kommissar Kuhl is only one of
those players who was tasked to do this dirty job, and I am merely
giving you a sample of what she wrote to various German, Canadian,
and U.S. officials - there are dozens if not hundreds of
participants, all hunting down one pacifist dissident who challenged
the conventional historical story of what we think of as the
"Holocaust."
The dated texts below are a very small sample of my summarizing
translation notes to help our U.S. immigration attorney, who does not
speak English, to understand how German officials ensnared their
favorite villain.
Dates are important to understand this. Remember that Ernst was
kidnapped February 5, 2003, taken in shackles across the Canadian
border on February 17, 2003, returned to the U.S. on the same day,
held in a Batavia detention until February 19, and then permanently
put across the border to Canada.
Here is what these captured documents show:
Sabine Kuhl on February 18, 2003 to a BKA liaison in Washington, D.C.:
We are letting you know that as of 2/17/2003 a new arrest warrant has
been sworn out.
Because of a possible deportation of Zundel to Germany, the
Prosecutor in Mannheim is asking the following:
* How long will the U.S.A. keep Zundel in detention?
* Is there a possibility that the U.S. agencies would release
Zundel from detention even without a valid passport?
If there are further questions, call the above number.
The following documents are added to this message:
* A shortened version of the arrest warrant of 02/17/2003 in
German (the translation into English is going to be sent on
02/19/2003)
* A letter from Mannheim dated 02/17/2003 was personally handed
to the Canadian Embassy
* A letter from Mannheim dated 02/17/2003 was sent to the
General Consulate in Atlanta/Canada (on 02/17/2003 also sent to the
Foreign Ministry)
=====
Sabine Kuhl on February 20, 2003 to a BKA liaison in Washington, D.C.:
We are asking to send us all the details of the arrest up to the
deportation of Ernst Zundel to Canada.
The BKA would like to have the same information.
Especially, we would like to know the following:
* What caused the arrest of Ernst Zundel on 2/5/2003? (Our
office only received press releases and the news from Atlanta General
Consulate.
* What kind of status did Ernst Zundel have, since he is
married to a U.S. citizen?
* Is there a chance that he might return to the U.S.?
* Why was he sent to Canada?
* Why were there different opinions as to where he should be
sent, Canada or Germany, within the INS?
Today we already established contact between Leslie Peters, liaison
at the Canadian Embassy in Berlin (see email)
In case Bloedorn [apparently located at the German Embassy in
Washington, D.C.] has contact with the Canadian authorities, we
could clear the fax of 02/19/2003 why the Canadian officials have
contact with the German Embassy in Ottawa.
====
Sabine Kuhl on February 21, 2003 to someone named "Krömer" [Krämer?]
Pertaining to your fax of 02/19/2003 it was decided that House and
Kuhl would accompany Ernst Zundel during his flight on 02/21/2003
from Dulles to Germany/Frankfurt - arriving 02/22/2003 around 7:10
a.m.
In order to accomplish that, House and Kuhl will arrive on 02/20/2003
around 3 p.m. at Dulles Airport. We ask that the following items be
cleared:
Confirmation of the deportation of Ernst Zundel for 02/21/2003, 5:30
p.m. from Washington (according to General Consulate, Atlanta, Mr.
Bartholomei is in contact with Mr. Nelson of the [U.S.] INS in order
for the return passport for Ernst Zundel [to be issued?]. He needs
the photos for this passport.
We need to know how Ernst Zundel is going to be handed over to the
German officials in the U.S.A.
We need lodging arrangements for House and Kuhl for February 20 and 21.
We need a ride from Dulles.
House and Kuhl have business passports to enter the U.S. We need
confirmation that these business passports are sufficient to stay in
the U.S. one day.
=====
Oliver Bloedorn note to himself, dated June 3, 2003:
I am sending replies to CSIS that were given to me from BND - VS in
Ottawa. CSIS is seemingly against Ernst Zundel staying in Canada and
needs additional documentation from Germany. I am asking for
additional info.
=====
A note from someone named Berndt Goebel, dated June 6, 2003:
Hey, Helmut, Sabine -
I believe you could put this file back on the table.
=====
A (partial) note from a woman named Jessica Fernandez, apparently of
the German Consulate in Toronto, to Helmut House of the BKA,
Meckenheim, dated July 5, 2003:
It may be concluded that Ernst Zundel is not in the possession of a
valid passport. According to CIC in Niagara Falls, the last passport
is in their possession. The General Consulate has asked CIC to hand
over this travel passport at the latest when the deportation papers
are prepared. Here it is assumed that Ernst Zundel will probably
refuse to sign the passport, in which case RES 515-35, No 2.1 will
have to be used.
=====
There is an important document by one Peter Ziegler, presumably the
German Ambassador in Ottawa, dated June 20, 2003 that states, in
essence, that it is difficult to nail Ernst Zundel, given the
ambiguous Canadian laws and the fact that he was cleared in 1992 by
the Supreme Court of Canada. The document hints at the possibility
that an "informal" arrangement was offered to the Germans by the
Canadian Justice Ministry.
=====
TO MY READERS: You have now gotten a very small glimpse of the many,
many documents, thousands of them - letterheads and all! - that were
handed over to Ernst, apparently according to some German version of
the Freedom of Information Act. Copies of these documents are now in
the hands of various attorneys in several countries. This story has
barely begun!
This was no simple "visa overstay", as U.S. Immigration officials
have claimed! This was an extrajudicial rendition - in other words,
a political kidnapping. Let that be stated for the record!
Ingrid Zundel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060615/ec6430cf/attachment.htm
More information about the Zgrams
mailing list