British Ian Buckley on The Trials of Ernst Zundel: "God have
mercy on mankind!"
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Sat Nov 26 08:45:33 EST 2005
British Ian Buckley on The Trials of Ernst Zundel: "God have mercy
on mankind!"
At the outset, it should be noted that this piece is in no sense a
substitute for Paul Eisen's excellent and exhaustive "The Holocaust
Wars." Rather, it is a personal reflection upon the growing lack of
freedom in the Western world, as illustrated by the story of one man.
Though it is the story of one man, it applies to us all, as the
mistreatment once handed down to those handily designated and
demonized as 'extremists' and 'cultists' is extended more and more to
ordinary citizens.
Ladies and Gentleman, the New World Order is on your doorstep. Open
resistance brings down a rain of fire as at Fallujah, while in the
outer ring of indirect, diffuse oppression, more subtle methods than
mass murder usually prevail.
'Terror' and fear of 'terror' - which is anyway largely sponsored and
created by government intelligence agencies - means acquiescence as
acres of streets in the city of Leeds are sealed off or tanks ring
Heathrow Airport. Even English country towns are monitored and
secured, under perpetual watch by veritable forests of security
cameras on poles.
Indeed it's fortunate that Zundel is still around to face the
Mannheim trial, when one bears in mind the dismal and sinister fate
that often befalls very high-profile dissenters when they fall into
the hands of the injustice system. Such was the case even in the
Eisenhower era : in this context one thinks of psychologist Wilhelm
Reich, the originator of the wonderful term 'Hoodlums in Government'
or HIGs, a phrase which is much more applicable now than in Reich's
days. Or of Francis Parker Yockey, widely accused of being both
pro-Communist and pro-Nazi, but more likely a fellow of philosophical
bent unenamoured of liberal capitalism.
Reading through a selection of Ernst Zundel's letters from prison,
you may feel that he has descended as a witness into the dismal and
deadly underbelly of so-called democracy. Ernst notes the following
incident during his stay at the Ottawa Detention Center, which he -
quite justifiably - nicknamed 'Abu Ghraib North' :
'One young Negro died in the cell next to me. Why? He must have had
some seizure or breathing difficulties. The guards shouted, danced
around and taunted him. I saw him the day before. He was athletic,
had good muscle tone like many young Blacks who are in far better
physical shape than Whites - yet I saw him through my little 8 1/2 by
11 cell observation window, carried out of his cell limp like a dish
rag, dumped unto a gurney, electric shock applied to his heart, given
an injection, given CPR, oxygen - the fellow was dead!'
What is prison, if not a place where society attempts - and fails -
to hide its true face, its real nature? Are not many of the 'cons'
little more than victims of a harsh, commercialised and globalized
environment? The outer jail is 'society', while the inner one is
prison itself. Over two million Americans are now incarcerated;
something to think about when you hear those vain and bombastic State
of the Union addresses.
Ernst again :
'Four big guards came in the afternoon. Ordered me out of my cell
with my stuff, took me to the corridor, threw my mental cellmate on
the floor, kicked him, pummelled him 'til he was dragged along the
halls, bleeding and screaming. Eventually, I was put into the general
population, which meant three times out of the cell.'
Ernst Zundel's initial arrest came over two years ago, a short while
before the start of the US-UK assault on Iraq. A posse of immigration
officials - some of them armed - descended upon his home in rural
Tennessee. A little excessive, perhaps, when the 'villain' concerned
is a life-long pacifist and the ostensible charge he faces is a mere
visa violation! By all normal standards, as his wife Ingrid is an
American citizen, Zundel should enjoy legal status, and not be
subject to arbitrary harassment in this way. Incidentally, as a
pacifist, Ernst Zundel would make quite an unusual 'Nazi'.
After the arrest, he entered into a nether world of leg irons, a cell
with a perpetually glowing light and a regime of ridiculous,
pettifogging regulations - such as being forbidden access to Post-it
notes and marker pens. And all for what?
The ostensible charge in America was a violation of immigration
rules. In Canada, Zundel was officially some sort of (undefined)
threat to national security. But in essence, Ernst Zundel is being
accused of heresy. He has challenged a dogma of the 'Church' and the
'Empire' prosecutes and persecutes.
We are all different, and have varying political ideals and
viewpoints. For example, I don't share Zundel's almost instinctive
anti-Communism. To my mind, there is something to be said for
Communism when mixed with national patriotism, as seen in Fidel's
Cuba or the latter years of the USSR. At least such nations provide -
or did provide - full employment, universal health care, and a sense
of community.
But for three centuries or more, opinion was sacred. The idea that no
man or woman should be arrested for their thoughts or beliefs was an
essential part of a civilised society. But Zundel has endured over
two years in jail, and faces the possibility of much more jail time,
solely because of his opinions on the events of World War II. I say
'solely', but - who knows - maybe his pamphlet "The West, War and
Islam" also contributed to his arrest as a 'Public Enemy'.
In "The West, War and Islam" he warns that '..distorted viewpoints
are deliberately being used and often magnified to goad the West into
a future criminal war against the Islamic world.'
Huh, completely wrong there, Ernst!
Jesting aside, Zundel 'denies' much less than some might imagine,
saying that: 'It is absolutely true that Jews were incarcerated and
often treated cruelly. They were seen as the enemy, just as in our
times the "Nazis" are seen as the enemy of entrenched oligarchies.'
He just disbelieves in the existence of extermination gas chambers,
after initiating some first hand research on the matter. Surely the
normal, rational procedure would be have honest, open debate on this
subject, and not to suppress one side of the argument. Suspicion must
always fall on those who attempt to silence their opponents.
One very important statement on the case was made by Dr. Roger
Dommergue from France, who had this to say to American officials:
'I have known M. Zundel these last 20 years, and as a Jew I felt
compelled to check what he said and published. I became conscious of
the fact that he was a most distinguished mind, that he told the
truth and that I could understand why my all-powerful peers did not
like him! I feel that a country in which he resides can be proud of
having him. Please give him back his liberty in the country of
liberty, and keep away from the totalitarianism of my worst peers who
think they have all the rights because of their financial and
political power.'
All true, of course, but Zundel was still railroaded back to Germany,
after high-level twisting of the law had taken place in both the USA
and Canada. There his trial began just a week ago, on the 8th
November, with Zundel's first thoughts just before its start being
for others : 'This judgment is important for other imprisoned
idealists / human rights activists - people who struggle for their
human and civil rights in Germany and beyond!'
The trial itself has an interesting feature in that the defence team
must weave a delicate ballet, for if they seem to share the heretic's
views, then they too are subject to arrest. It is like the return of
Galileo!
However, unlike the deluded American and British dole queue
conscripts now occupying Iraq, Zundel has one great consolation:
"At least I have the privilege of understanding the forces which took
hold of me. God have mercy on mankind!"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20051126/4b6fe23e/attachment.htm
More information about the Zgrams
mailing list