Here comes Part II of the Dommergue letter to Stephen Spielberg. I have left the slight grammar and syntactic quirks intact because I think they add real ethnic flavor and genuine human fury to this piece.
The French-speaking Jewish professor, Dr. Dommergue, titled this part of his letter "The Shoa Sherlockholmised":
1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that in a war ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good piece of news not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
2. Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as "night and fog" (by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German towns containing more than 100,000 people, "holocausting" hundreds of thousands women and children who are never mentioned?
3. Where would have been the 4 million Jews (if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz, there was no zyclon B gas-chambers? (There never was any proof of mass gassing with any other gas).
4. Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze evidence out? Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend. What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?
5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that the Germans cremated 1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust. ( 1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke?
6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic, from the collapse of German youth, from the unemployment of 6 million people, who, back to work could give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?
7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666, inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that cyclon B is hyperflammable?
9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue, a court ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal truth for ever. It would definitively shut the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to the revisionist Gorbatchev.
10. How could zyclon B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one ( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard of complexity and cost? Why, at the trial of the Degesh, which fabricated the cyclon B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable?
11. Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken.
12. Why was, for the first time in History, the doctors degree of Mr Roques, on the " Gerstein report" cancelled? And still, this report was not accepted at the Nuremberg trial! Besides the well known historian, a socialist minister, Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that " nobody could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing first through the excellent thesis of M. Roques" Alain Decaux said: "I admired the skill and perfection of a "chartist" performed by M.Roques in his doctors degree on the Gerstein report". ( in his book: "la guerre absolue" 1998)
13. Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at a Sorbonne seminar, (to which no revisionist was invited), (state) that there was not the slightest trace of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?
14. Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans as expressed in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann ("Germany must perish"), by sterilisation of German men.? It is undoubtedly a small detail?
15. Why cyclon B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, could be used in the concentration camps for other purposes than delousing and protection against typhus? Why large quantities of cyclon B could be found in camps where it is official that there never was any gassings ???
16. Why do they harp on the "six-million-gas-chamber" and never on the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews?
17. Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, the famous exterminationist Jews disgraced themselves by talking of " poetic licence" in their holocaust assertions, and never came back when summoned by the judges?
18. Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? (the man of the contaminated blood and another man, a Communist dragging along 200,000,000 corpses).
19. Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out nines? There is no need of stalino-Orwellian law " to be put in prison because of ones beliefs " ( thought crime of " 1984 ") as stated M. Toubon, before he became a minister of Justice in France, to set up truth. This law is anticonstitutional, antidemocratic, against the rights of men. Facts, proofs, pros and cons, are only what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it. Labbé Pierre did ask for it : they pretended to grant it but refused it almost immediately. The forum did take place at the television of Lugano. It was a complete success for the Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger only when authorised.
20. Why is it that when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude, he is forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History, sets up the insane concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a secular state.
21. Why did the EXPRESS,a famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all that concerns it, is false?
22. There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by the Jews to Hitler. Hitler had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet and which is called "democracy" by semantic mystification. Only two parties are left: the totalitarian judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet and Nationalism for the Goyim not yet cankered by capitalisto-marxist jewish influence.
In "Marianne" Jean François Kahn expresses anger against the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress about the despoilment of jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington. He writes: "They have reduced the Shoah to a financial market. So the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of this time, is not the exploited worker in Cracovie, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant of Kiev, the modest shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman of Riga, but the cosmopolitan billionaire who collected Rembrandt and Rubens, slept on a heap of gold signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children to the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career. This mighty lobby of American oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing the holocaust to a Shoa-business."
If Faurisson had written what J.F Kahn wrote he would have had one more trial on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt!
By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce (A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian judeopathy) <end>
Thought for the Day:
"I watch Brokaw not so much to learn what's happened in the world during the past 24 hours, but to learn what the Jewish spin is on what's happened. I'm interested in knowing what the Jewish party line is. By watching Tom Brokaw mouth his lines every evening I get some idea of what Brokaw's Jewish boss, Neal Shapiro, the executive producer of the NBC Nightly News, wants us to think about the news."
(Quote from a radio program sent to the Zundelsite)