As I briefly reported before: After a lengthy and very costly Human Rights Tribunal hearing involving columnist Doug Collins and the paper that ran his column, the North Shore News - and after he was cleared of the vexatious charges, the censors we all know said "Business As Usual" - ***and charged him all over again!***
Here is his reply. He of the "Swindler's List" controversy is socking it to the Canadian censors right on their smutty noses - as only an old soldier would!
You have a duty now - to spread this as far and wide as you can! This is just plain magnificent - and long overdue!
"Human Rights" Statement by Doug Collins
Victoria, July 20, 1998.
I am not attending this so-called human rights tribunal - except to say that I am not attending. I am not defending the columns Harry Abrams and B'Nai Brith are complaining about because there is nothing to defend. The columns contain facts and opinions that Jewish organizations don't like. But they are not hate literature. If they were I would have been charged under the federal hate laws. Instead, the Human Rights Code - B.C.'s Heresy Act - has been thrown at me and the North Shore News for the second time. It's harassment, pure and simple, especially when you consider that one of the columns that figure in this complaint was heard last year at the first tribunal.The complaint was dismissed, so the Inquisition wants a re-match. But if I can steal a title from a book, let me say that none dare call it conspiracy.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. We are seeing the greatest threat to freedom of the press since the courts shot down the Alberta Press Act in 1938. But many in the media don't understand that. Or that this Heresy Act is an instrument for enforcing political correctness, so that anyone telling a Newfie joke could find himself up before a kangaroo court.
What is a kangaroo court? It's a tribunal where truth is no defence, where opinion is on trial, where fines can be unlimited, where there is no trial by jury, where the judge - called an adjudicator - is judge, jury and prosecutor, where there is no right of appeal within the framework of the Act, where normal rules of evidence don't exist, and where impressions count for more than fact.
If some powerful pressure group like the Canadian Jewish Congress or B'Nai Brith doesn't like what you are saying, you can become the subject of a vicious and costly complaint. That applies even if the case leads to a dismissal. It's a signal to publishers and writers not to have too much to say where the interests of such groups are concerned.
Where heresy is concerned the NDP has no time for the real courts and has admitted it. But the only hope lies with the regular legal system because this abominable law is almost certainly unconstitutional. Roger McConchie, the lawyer for the B.C. Press Council , had it right when he said that the Human Rights Code is is an attempt to stifle speech that is not criminal.
It's a big story, very little of which has been explained in the mainstream media. Saturated in political correctness as so many of them are, they demonize dissidents and accept handouts from people who use trigger words like "racist," "white supremacist," "anti-Semitic", and "hatemonger". But there has been some opposition. The Globe & Mail has called the law "a criminal abuse of human rights"; the Calgary Herald said it was "a tool of repression"; B.C. Report magazine has compared what is happening here with press restrictions in Nazi Germany; to its credit, even the Jewish Western Bulletin has stated editorially that this is a dangerous law, and the Writers Union of Canada asked Premier Glen Clark to get rid of it. We can be sure that its letter went into the trash basket.
The B.C. Press Council and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association have performed nobly. Last year they intervened on behalf of the North Shore News. They're not doing it this time because we are not defending ourselves unless we get to the real courts.
The Human Rights Code is a legal atrocity. Anyone who says anything that "indicates" discrimination can fall within its orbit, especially if they are right of centre. Left of centre is safe enough, of course. The B.C. Government Employees Union, the Canadian Jewish Congress, B'Nai Brith and similar groups would never have to face the kind of action they favor for others. A double standard exists.
Recently, they tried to prevent Doug Christie's Free Speech League
>from holding a meeting in a public library. If THAT doesn't indicate
discrimination, what does? But he would be wasting his time if he entered a human rights complaint, even though freedom of speech and assembly are the most important rights of all.
The Jewish Congress and B'Nai Brith are the biggest threats to freedom of expression in this country, backed as they are by governments that encourage them and even grovel to them. I am reminded of what went on in a different context in Maurice Duplessisí Quebec.
As already stated, this tribunal is dealing with a column that was the subject of a five-week complaint last year by the Canadian Jewish Congress.That was the one on "Hollywood Propaganda". I have it here, in case you haven't seen it. For the North Shore News, the price of winning that one was over $200,000. So this tribunal is a matter of double jeopardy. Obviously, Ujjal Dosnanjh has never heard of that. Or doesn't want to hear of it.
The Abrams complaint includes three other columns. Fire a whole quiver of arrows and one might hit the target, you see. And there's nothing to say that after this tribunal hands down its decision, he or one of his accomplices won't come up with yet another bunch of columns.
There's a word for this sort of thing - barratry - meaning constant, vicious and vexatious litigation, in this instance encouraged by the worst B.C. government in living memory.
So far, the Heresy Act has been used selectively. But don't kid yourselves that won't be used more widely. That's the way of it with leftists. It's called Fabian Socialism. The tree of freedom is being demolished slowly, branch by branch. It reminds me of an article I saw in the Atlantic Monthly, which asked whether democracy wasn't just a moment.
One of the absurdities of the situation is that making human rights complaints can be a way of making money. Harry Abrams wants B'Nai Brith to be awarded $5,000 each from me and the News for every column that's found to be in fault, plus - and get this - $2,000 for himself on account of the time he spent getting his allegations together Poor Harry. What's HIS rate of pay, I wonder? Two thousand bucks an hour? And he wants $2,000 for himself even though he's been granted legal aid. Legal aid, you see, is available to all complainants even if they are as rich as Bill Gates. But it's not automatically available to those who are being prosecuted.They have to qualify. How one-sided can you get?
The forces arrayed against freedom are big time. Instead of standing up for free speech, which is what a province's chief law officer should do. Ujjal Dosanjh favors censorship. Yet he's the guy who's always talking about equality. He supports leftists who have pressured hotels into denying meeting rooms for the politically incorrect. He has also organized police "hate squads". Fascist countries have had similar kinds of police. Dozanjh the immigrant is B.C.'s Big Brother, here to instruct us on British democracy.
I am not here to plead for myself. My day is done. I am here to plead for what used to be British Columbia, where opinion was once untrammelled. I am here to plead for a free press. Barbara Amiel once asked whether there is anyone in this country who will give us back our freedoms. Apparently not. Not in Victoria and not in Ottawa, irrespective of party. So one day we may wake up to find we can say nothing unless the Dosanjhes and the Clarks tell us it's OK to say it. And if you're criticizing a powerful pressure group, get your copy cleared by them in advance. The same forces are now trying to control the Internet. To them, free comment is intolerable.
This is no longer a free country. Don't kid yourselves that it is. And it will not be until we get rid of these awful human rights commissions. Everyone associated with them should be ashamed of themselves. Should be, but aren't. Money and power are involved, and they wake up in the morning wondering who they can go after next. Well, it may be you.
One more thing. I am retired from newspaper work and am speaking for myself, not for the North Shore News. Thank you.
For more information on Doug Collins see:
* http://www.canadafirst.net/cafe/oliver/index.html * http://www.freedomsite.org/cafe/press_releases/pr5.html
Thought for the Day:
"I have said it before and will say it again: He's a man in a nation of wimps. And to think that he hates Adolf Hitler!"
(Ernst Zundel)