Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland

October 30, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:



I am going to have to go back on my promise to ship the series of extremely important and telling transcript condensations of last May's opening hearings of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in the Zundelsite matter. An important legal consideration has developed, and I am putting them on ice for the time being. We will keep them pristine and ready to go - if and when!

I hope these hearing transcripts will be a bench mark about the tactics of these so-called "Human Rights" hit squads that function at the behest of special interest groups to finish off politically inconvenient opposition - transcripts to be studied by Truth Seekers for generations to come! Believe me they're Revisionist gold!

Meanwhile, three documents have come to my attention that I think are making the "slippery slope" even more slippery for our opposition.

One is an as yet unverified, marked "Confidential" letter briefly posted on the Net that made the interesting point that letting Revisionism take hold in Germany ". . . WOULD NOT BE IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST."

This document came - and went! - in a flash!

I checked this morning with a source and can't say more than that - except: should it turn out to be authentic, it would be a damning admission that at the highest level of the German government, the geo-political realities of Revisionism are very clearly understood - and feared!

The second document is a ten-page German translation from Russian sent to the Zundelsite by a highly reliable European Revisionist. This is the German translation of an original segment "wisely" omitted in a 1996 book published in Switzerland.

Titled "Anthroposophy on the crossroads of contemporary occult-political stream" (Basel, 1996), this book was written by Gennadij Bondarew, a Russian anthroposophist, writer, and professor of philosophy/sociology at Moscow Sociological Research Institute.

The translation of the omitted paragraphs is one of the most fascinating "bird's eye views" of the Holocaust from a Russian's perspective that I have ever seen! I hope to get an English translation as well and post both translations soon.

Of interest to Revisionists worldwide is the fact that this Professor Bonderew was prevented from speaking at the Congress "Netherlands-Russia / New Opportunities", held in The Hague, Holland from 3 -5 October in the old City Hall, because passages in his Russian book were thought to be against the law (Dutch criminal code 137c -f), WHICH FORBIDS DENYING THE HOLOCAUST, MAKING DENIAL A FELONY.

This speaker cancellation caused a local and then a national row in Holland and two articles in the anarcho-liberal weekly "De Groene Amsterdammer" (nr. 41 and 42). With this event an inner struggle within the Anthroposophic Society came to the fore over the issue of free speech or political correctness.

What did I predict a few weeks ago - that Revisionism is now conquering not only individuals but entire countries?

Russia now? Holland next?

Stay tuned and watch what happens!

The third document, a press release, comes from the Australian Adelaide Institute website, also embattled by the Human Rights gang, titled: "Australia's Prime Minister admits to censoring history":

"The following text is Channel 9's 7 AM TV news item, wherein Prime Minister John Howard admits that David Irving's banning from Australia is based on Irving's views on historical matters. . .

To date, the official view from immigration minister Philip Ruddock has been that David Irving's banning rests on "his bad character", a result of Irving's politically-motivated conviction in Germany.

Howard has let the cat out of the bag and now we know that his government is censoring historical debate. Adelaide Institute has asked Mr Ruddock to grant Irving a visa so that he can fly out to Adelaide.

Irving is to be a witness for Adelaide Institute's case before the Human Rights Commission which commences in Adelaide on 15 December 1997."

Here is the television interview, as reported to us verbatim:

"Presenter: Prime Minister John Howard has been confronted by banned Nazi historian David Irving at a business conference. Mr Irving, who has been banned from entering Australia due to his writings on the Holocaust, asked the PM whether Australia is suppressing free speech by refusing him a visitors' visa.

Reporter Fleur Bitcon: The theme of the Prime Minister's speech to the Commonwealth Business Forum was globalisation, breaking down the barriers to trade, Mr Howard calling for new world talks.

Howard: Australia' view is that a new global round could and should be launched at the end of this century.

Bitcon: But in the crowd at the international forum, Nazi historian David Irving wanted to talk about barriers of a different kind, trying to embarrass Mr Howard about his government's refusal to let the author into Australia.

Irving: Would you say a word about Australia's record into the suppression of free speech of your country of which of course I am a victim?

Bitcon: Jewish leaders have accused Mr Irving of being pro-Nazi. Mr Howard told him why his government has twice banned him from coming to Australia.

Howard: ". . . reasons that relate in part, as you know, to some of the views you have expressed about matters which we believe, if propagated in Australia, WOULD NOT BE IN THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL INTEREST. (emphasis added)

Irving: [outside the meeting] I've not been kept out of Australia because of my views on Jews. I've been kept out of Australia because of the Jews' views about me."

(Fleur Bitcon National Nine News, Edinburgh.)

Thought for the Day:

"It was hell finding this site! Being shoved off on all kinds of, shall we say, non-truth sites!"

(A ZGram reader, trying to log on to the Zundelsite)




Comments? E-Mail: ezundel@cts.com


Back to Table of Contents of the Oct. 1997 ZGrams

ÿ