September 3, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

I have said it before, but it bears repeating, that - all so-called political correctness issues aside - it is horrendously expensive NOT to pay attention to Revisionists. Man, is it ever costly! It's a little bit like choosing to die from scurvy - refusing to take the Vitamin C that is sitting, bottled, on the shelf.

Not only people, but countries, ignore Revisionist research, accumulated over 20 years, at their peril. Ernst's words are forever burned into my psyche that ". . . $1,000 worth of Revisionism could have saved the Swiss billions."

Since it appears as though I have not only a goodly number of new Swiss readers on my ZGram list but also mainstream journalist - who are beginning to prick up their ears about what's _really_ playing here! - it doesn't hurt to go back to some previously plowed political themes, some of which are summarized in the latest GANPAC Brief, September 1997.

For the uninitiated, GANPAC is the only political organization in the United States trying to defend and represent the interests of the 60 million Americans who have declared themselves "German-Americans", this nation's largest ethnic group.

Hans Schmidt, the author of the passages below, is its leader, and he is the man who was imprisoned in 1995 for five months in Germany for four politically incorrect words he had written in a 6,000 + word essay, these four words being ". . . Jew- and Freemason-infested", referring to German politicians and media.

It bears repeating also that Schmidt, then 68 and in retirement, wrote those words _as an American citizen on American soil_ and mailed his letter from America, for which he was nabbed in Germany while visiting his 91-year-old mother and thrown in the slammer for almost half a year, just like a common criminal - and not a peep from our State Department, always waxing eloquent about other countries Human Rights abuses.

Here's Schmidt:

"The story about the so-called 'Nazi Gold' it still making news. I assume it will be thus until Switzerland really pays the Zionist blackmailers the billions of dollars they are demanding.

In this connection it may be worthwhile to ask how the Allies (including the United States) handled the matter of gold and other precious metals _owned by German individuals_ after the capitulation of the Reich in 1945. Unfortunately, I do not have the English text of the Proclamation No. 2 of the 'Allied Control Commission' that was used on October 20th, 1945 at hand, but I am certain that my translation from the German will suffice.

"Paragraph 15 (a) Germans and all other persons living in Germany have to turn over to the Allies all gold and silver (and platinum) which they possess either in coin or in bullion. This also includes such precious metals which they may own outside of Germany.

Paragraph 15 (b) German authorities and all persons in Germany have to turn over to the Allies all foreign currency and coins which they own."

In case of non-compliance, harsh sentences were meted out, including (in the Soviet Zone) incarceration in concentration camps where for up to five years no contact with relatives was permitted. (On the other hand, during the war, Jews in German concentration camps, including Auschwitz, were able to write letters and receive packages. The Auschwitz camp had a huge post office.)

Please do not ask what happened to the gold and silver (and wedding rings) of the eighty million Germans who survived the war. Things that were taken from the Germans after 1918 and again after 1945 were _never_ stolen but always merely _liberated_ since the thieves were, well, "democrats" )(...)

Regarding other German assets in Switzerland, the following quote from the May 16th, 1997 issue of the 'New Era' (a daily newspaper) in Lancaster, PA, may interest our readers:

'Under the same (1946) agreement, Switzerland promised to liquidate all German assets worth between $250 million and $750 million (which would be worth $2.5 billion to 7.5 billion today. HS), and turn over half to the Allies for European reconstruction and assistance to war victims.'

Please do not consider this as theft in any way or form. You must remember that what the Allies did was _always_ born out of highest moral and ethical motives. 'Democrats' never steal. Only 'Nazis' and 'racists' are rapacious.

Few of us doubt that the major reason for the current attack against Switzerland is based upon the insatiable need of the Zionists for money. It bears remembering that, for instance, the billions of dollars Israel receives yearly from the United States do not buy as much as they did 15 or 20 years ago when the give-away started. Other sources for ever more money have to be found.

However, there are also other factors we have to consider when we try to guess the true aims of the behind-the-scenes powers:

The attacks against the Swiss could simply be a convenient (and easy) way for the _Oberjuden_ ("top Jews") o show their nearly absolute power over the goyim of the world.

Or, the 'Nazi gold' matter might just be another method of keeping the 'Holocaust' myth alive.

Or, the gold-backed (and nearly independent) Swiss currency is a thorn in the eye of the financial schemers in New York, Tel Aviv and London, and this affair may be an attempt to destroy Switzerland's unique role in international financial markets.

The above-mentioned 'New Era' article, however, contained another interesting sentence which may provide a hint as to what the story is all about:

'The idea that a small European nation could remove itself from conflict simply by fortifying and refusing to take sides has been blasted forever.'

In other words, the New World Order (with the US being used as the world's policeman) will not permit neutrality.

Personally, I do not feel sorry for the Swiss. Not too long ago, they voted by a small margin to make the 'denial of the Holocaust' a criminal offense.

In other words, the Jews were given a privileged and unassailable status. Now the Swiss received the 'thank you' note for this vote that was coming to them."

I will add my two-cents worth to the above analysis. I think it could well be that Jewish power is, by now, in such a disarray that individuals (read D'Amato here. . . ) are acting independently and doing stupid things.

To have unleashed this "Nazi Gold" red herring was stupid and not in their own interest.

Now it is country watching country - no longer self-appointed censors watching those who call themselves Revisionists and talked about the Holocau$t as an extortion tool for the past twenty years.

The Swiss will have a referendum, and I predict that the extortionists will get a public trouncing they will not soon forget.

Ingrid

Thought for the Day:

"Without anger there can be no victory and useful anger is based upon understanding." (

H.R. Knickerbocker)

Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com

Back to Table of Contents of the Sept. 1997 ZGrams