August 1, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

I wrote this ZGram prior to the Arab retaliation attack in the Israeli market in response to spiritual assault - the details of which I don't really know, hardly ever having time to watch the news. I will let the ZGram stand "as is" - and leave you to your thoughts:

For a while there, the papers have been full of stories of a deranged Russian Jewess who, various reports have it, showed the Prophet Mohammed as a pig befouling the Koran.

Of course the Arabs are outraged. What's more, according to additional reports, not all top Israeli officials have openly condemned, or even expressed regret, for the circulation for what is euphemistically called an "anti-Muslim flyer".

Imagine the Arabs had done something similar, portraying the Jewish Jehovah as a pig - they wouldn't get away with a mild slap on the wrist and some benign comments about an "anti-Jewish flyer"!

It has been interesting to me to watch the Arab outrage - and the LACK of Christian outrage at a similar insult, because an Israeli magazine recently published a blasphemous image of the Blessed Virgin Mary - an out-and-out insult to Catholics.

I have seen this picture myself - somebody shipped it to me as an "attachment". This Israeli magazine depicts the Virgin Mary as part cow, part human - under the guise of ". . . alerting its readers to the dangers of cloning."

Such acts are not hate mongering?

One wonders why people refuse to fight back.

One reader suggests some solutions:

"I observed with horror how some words have the capacity to paralyze people and force them on the defensive. These words are used as a weapon which creates sympathy for the user and forces the accused on the defensive, regardless of the fact that most of the time he/she is not "guilty" of being at all the character described by the accuser.

These "magic" words are: 1) Fascist; 2) Nazi; 3) Anti-Semite.

I observed that numerous times, such accusations are used to cower people, to drag them into courts, to arrest and to deport them or worse.

Now, since it is impossible to defend against such words, why not go on the offensive?

How about accusing high profile people on the Political Correct side of being Anti-Gentile, Anti-Gentilic or some other catchy combination such as Anti-Goy, Anti-Goyim etc.

The next step is to slap some discrimination law suit on them on the basis that they discriminate against employees of Goyim extraction, or that their colleges are discriminating against other races and ethnic groups by accepting only people of a particular racial or ethnic group etc.

Then should come law suits against the defamation of character of Goy people - for which their own publications can be used as evidence in court for incitement against people of other creeds/color/religion/nationality.

Their publications are full of incitement against the Palestinians, for instance; also for hateful and demeaning speech against Christians.

Why run for cover, when the same means used by them to enslave us can also be used by us to regain our freedom of expression and the freedom from malicious and groundless prosecution."

I have thought about this a lot - and I will tell you here and now that, in the not-too-distant future I will, like Rosa Parks, get up from the back of the bus, stare down my opposition and say to the rest of the world:

"Next time you call me a 'Nazi' - you will do so with genuine respect!"

What's more, I know precisely how. Will it be all that difficult? I don't think so. Here's what one poet said:

"I can bear scorpion's sting,
tread fields of fire,
in frozen gulfs of cold eternal lie,
be tossed aloft through tracts of endless void,
but cannot live in shame."

Ingrid

Thought for the Day:

"While he is being elbowed out of his own home, the American looks calmly abroad and urges on others the suicidal ethics which are exterminating his own race."

(Madison Grant in "The Passing of the Great Race.")

Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com

Back to Table of Contents of the Aug. 1997 ZGrams