Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland
". . . What is the best method for destroying the Holocaust? Full disclosure - in a phrase. What revisionists must do is to continue to dig up German documents and Soviet inspection reports of the German camps in the former Soviet archives - and then ask the obvious question: 'Why were these key documents not presented at the Nuremberg Trials?'
Every lawyer applies this technique at trials. It is the same technique which should be applied with the 'six million.'
As the hidden truth emerges from Russia, each disclosure should be emphasized with 'This document was NOT presented at Nuremberg.'
This is sledgehammer technique but it permits no rebuttal.
The Zionists must be hammered unmercifully with facts they cannot deny or explain away. This is the simple and brutal technique which will convict them of the biggest hoax of all time . . . "
Another very faithful reader wrote a somewhat gentler letter:
". . . Often I ask myself: Will revisionist thought be validated in the mainstream? Hans Schmidt, in his current and past letters believes things must get so bad that people are forced to confront the question, 'Who has caused the catastrophe?'.
Others, such as yourself. I believe, hope the campaign to make people aware of the truth of the past and its importance to today will eventually work.
My biggest concern is that any change born of catastrophic conditions will be terrible for everyone. My support of revisonism arises from this concern and my desire to see the reputation of Germany made honest, as well as to put control of our countries back in the hands of those who represent the best interests of mankind - and not specific exploitive groups of economic or ethnic basis.
Revisionism is less about the past and more about the future. It is less about lies and more about clear vision. It is less about Germany than an example of the terrible fate of those who oppose the powerful . . . The revisionist dimension is much larger than usually thought. "
And let me tell you this: They know.
Everywhere you see it creeping up - the thought that it is dangerous to
force those loathsome "hate laws" down angry people's throats.
Here is one recent quote for you - straight from the horse's mouth - Chaim
Bermant, 4-10 April 1997, Los Angeles Jewish Times:
"I have said as much, and more, on many occasions, and have no hesitation saying it again: the campaign to make Holocaust denial a punishable offense is abominable in principle and unattainable in practice. It is almost unbelievable that Jews, of all people, who owe their survival to the fact that they live in a free society, should be ready, and even anxious, to undermine such freedom...The attempt to ban the revisionist books merely draws attention to their existence and gives a passing credence to their case."
Passing credence? Hang around.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Compared to the big hammers with which the revisionists are bludgeoning the foundation of the holohoax, mine is small.
"I'm not discouraged by this. I can bring a whole lot of people with little hammers to the task.
"That sucker is coming down before we hit 2000."
(A ZGram reader)