March 16, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

A cardinal Revisionist claim has it that the numbers of "Holocaust" victims are irresponsibly exaggerated and fluctuate like mad. How wildly these numbers vary can be seen by a chart that we worked up in December 1995 in response to an ADL ad in the New York Times asking - and here I paraphrase, because I do not have this reference handy:

"If they didn't perish, where did these people go?"

That's what we'd like to know! Why is it "anti-Semitic" to ask?

Pull up this graph and ponder it:

Why do we have a "shrinking Holocaust"?

The numbers game of alleged Jewish losses is indeed a vexing one. Many people of all nationalities disappeared or perished in the war and cannot be accounted for. Some lie in the ashes of Allied bombings of German cities and buried beneath collapsed buildings; others were incinerated in bomb-caused Allied firestorms; still others perished in the Russian Gulags long after the shooting had stopped.

It is unfair and incorrect to claim - as is routinely claimed - that if a person cannot be accounted for, he or she perished due to genocide - or, worse yet, due to gassings.

The media is full of "survivor" organizations existing in every major city of the Western World - from Toronto to Johannesburg; from Rio de Janeiro to Los Angeles. In fact, the "Holocaust" is the best example of ". . . death proved by the stories of million of survivors."

Does that not make you think?

If so many millions of Jewish people died at the hands of the Germans, WHY ARE THERE SO MANY SURVIVORS?

Suffice it to say that the Germans have paid over 4,300,000 pension and restitution claims; 40% of those recipients live (or lived) in Israel. Others are of Jewish background but have chosen to live in other parts of the world. The game is very simple: It pays to be a survivor.

Aficionados of the "Holocaust" have often called Jacob Robinson a "historian" and "internationalist jurist" and referred to him as a prime source of authoritative information on what happened to the Jews.

Jacob Robinson was, in fact, a cunning East European Jewish shyster with a diabolical plan and agenda. He was the inventor/creator of the "revolutionary concept" of the idea of the Nuremberg Trial for Germany's leaders and the German Reparations scheme.

Here is the story out of the horse's mouth. According to Nahum Goldman, former President of the World Jewish Congress,

". . . I only returned officially to Germany in order to meet Chancellor Adenauer and open negotiations about reparations. These reparations constitute an extraordinary innovation in terms of international law.

Until then, when a country lost a war, it paid damages to the victor, but it was a matter between states, between governments. Now for the first time a nation was to give reparations either to ordinary individuals or to Israel, which did not legally exist at the time of Hitler's crimes. All the same, I must admit that the idea did not come from me.

During the war the WJC (World Jewish Congress) had created an Institute of Jewish Affairs in New York (its headquarters are now in London). The directors were two great Lithuanian Jewish jurists, Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson. Thanks to them, the Institute worked out two completely revolutionary ideas: the Nuremberg tribunal and German reparations. (Goldman, Nahum, The Jewish Paradox, Grosset & Dunlap, 1978, p 122)

Put two and two together. Reparation claims are based on number of victims - somewhat like an insurance claim after a plane crash and a subsequent fire.

It pays to keep these numbers high and to keep the losses high. No mystery to that.

Now visualize an insurance company that has to pay for a fire in which, supposedly, some family members perished. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if the insurance company is prevented from checking vital documents - passenger lists, who had boarded and who didn't, who was carrying false passports etc., who was where when the plane actually crashed, who carried what possessions in his luggage etc., - a non-existent "victim" uncle or aunt could conceivably materialize, defrauding the insurance company.

That's why the fire marshal will carefully investigate a plane crash and fire, and that is why fire sites and plane crashes are forensically examined as a matter of routine. When someone withholds documentation or access to files, insurance fraud is assumed - which is a serious crime. Such fraud is known to have happened to insurance companies.

Insurance companies can get suspicious, and so can "Holocaust deniers."

Yet when it comes to questioning the records of the "Holocaust," in countries of the so-called "democratic" world, laws are passed called "hate laws," and people go to prison for wanting the check on the facts.

This has been beautifully summarized in an editorial regarding the vicious Goldhagen book in the August 1996 issue of the Barnes Review:

"The Six Million mantra, endlessly repeated, has been ruthlessly used as a club by the interests behind the big-stakes game played by the professional Holocaust promoters. They realize that the truth might set millions of citizen-taxpayers here, in Germany and elsewhere, free to question the outrageous moral and financial impositions currently imposed upon them by Israel, the Holocaust's chief beneficiary.

Even in the face of the implosion of the "six million" figure, the courts and lawmakers of Germany, France, Canada., etc. continue to hound, prosecute and jail those who publicly dispute what is now an admitted fraud. . . facts are no defense against apostasy, particularly when the Inquisitors have so successfully cowed their flock. . .

As the facts bring the actual numbers of Jewish deaths down, the Holocaust industry is not sitting still; indeed, they are rising to the occasion and meeting the challenge with unparalleled chutzpah. They continue to label those who seek factual accountings "haters" and "anti-Semites." Because of their promiscuous overuse, these smears no longer frighten many of those who would previously have been intimidated. So the promoters of the six million are reaching, straining to retain their stranglehold on the conscience of Western society by upping the ante. Now they are blaming an entire people. Such is the very definition of racism.

In other words, Holocaust promoters accuse others of what they are guilty of themselves.

As these absurdities mount, and as the facts of German treatment of Jews in World War II become widely known, maybe we can free ourselves of the shackles placed on political and public discourse, our pocketbooks and our nation's good name by a foreign nation, Israel - which is itself the nation most guilty of genocide, racism and hatemongering, and profits from it handsomely to boot."

Ingrid

Thought for the Day:

". . . the greatest and most insidiously conjured sales and indoctrination campaign ever waged."

(The Barnes Review, March 1995)

Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com

Back to Table of Contents of the March 1997 ZGrams