Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland
"Every Nation has different structures and strategies. I would say though that as a whole the movement here is quite strong.
Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Spain, Poland - just a few that spring straight to mind that have vibrant movements, even if some of the aims, ideals etc. aren't 'perfect'.
Plus countries such as Romania, Czech Rep., Hungary, Slovakia, Croatia, Ireland etc. etc. - all have very promising movements which could 'rise' overnight.
What we try and do is tie in different movements and give mutual support where it is needed. We like to advise and help build structures in different countries to help various groups become stronger ideologically and economically.
That doesn't mean we're out to make big fat cats very rich - it means we give the organisation the right economic ideas and plans which enable them to get various footholds which strengthen the organisation and put our economic ideas into practise.
Many write eloquently about this that and the other. We like to practise what we preach.
The key is that there are very interesting things happening all over Europe. Even here in apathetic England there is a pro-Life party standing against pro-abortionists in the coming general election. As such there are many possibilities offering themselves and only organisations which are strong - ideologically and economically - with a dedicated activist base will be able to 'profit' from these opportunities.
If you can mention our folks in Poland who are facing harsh times from the Neo-Communist govt. we'd be much obliged. They're not on the net, but details are at our site: http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/third-position/
I came across an astonishing item I still can't quite believe. According
to PNews Forum, quite a number of Arab universities REQUIRE students to
read the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion." I quote:
"Much current Arab writing on Judaism derives from the Nazis, Henry Ford, and Karl Marx. European, racist anti-Semitism had been endorsed by the highest levels of Arab society, not only in polemical writing but also in what purports to be scholarly.
The same is true of lower education. In 1969, a UNESCO commission analyzed UNRWA camp textbooks in Jordan, Lebanon, and Yesha. It found the Jews called liars, cheats, usurers, and idiots. The books teach the children that the Jewish people have always been Islam's irreconcilable enemy.
The commission recommended amending 65 textbooks out of 127 and eliminating another 14, but UNESCO dropped the issue (Bernard Lewis, Commentary Mag., 6/84, p.52)."
If that shocks you, let me point out that even though one-fourth of the
population of this great continent is of known German-descent, American
and Canadian children have been taught systematically and viciously since
the First World War that the Germans ". . . crucified Canadian soldiers
on barn doors", that they ". . . cut off Belgian children's hands",
that they ". . . made soap from Allied cadavers" - and, yes, that
these incurably vile Germans "killed six million Jews in gas chambers"
- without any protest from UNESCO or various human rights organizations
around the globe always so busy to follow the liberal agenda.
According to a Feb 15 Reuter report, the ever-outspoken ultra-Nationalist
Vladimir Zhirinovsky has said:
". . . NATO (is) repeating the mistakes of Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler by preparing to expand to the east."
Speaking to a crowd of supporters just outside the U.S. embassy in Moscow,
Zhirinovsky also said:
". . . NATO's plans to incorporate former communist countries in central and eastern Europe (are) tantamount to declaring war against Russia."
Zhirinovsky called NATO an 'aggressive bloc' and threatened to hold demonstrations
outside the embassies of other NATO countries in Moscow. His supporters
waved banners that read 'the United States and NATO are destroying Russia''
and 'NATO's insolence knows no bounds.'''
Also, according to Reuter, (Feb 14) the planned Berlin memorial
site for German memorial to Jews has hit a snag since the powers that be
". . . cannot agree on the site."
"It must be a place of vital historical and political meaning for Berliners or it will only be valuable for tourists,'' said one, commenting euphemistically on what would be the country's first national memorial purely to Jewish Holocaust victims.
From our Dr. Faurisson in France I received a little clipping sent to him
by C. Zaverdinos, a professor of Mathematics at the University of Natal,
stating the following, right from the horse's mouth, one Israel Melunsky:
"Successive US administrations have never lost sight of the fact that to disregard or antagonize the Jewish lobby is to court disaster and almost certain political death by suicide."
(Sunday Independent, 2 Feb 1997, p 11)
Adds Dr. Faurisson, who never minces words, much to the anguish of his vigilant
detractors:
"My question would be: If, as I tend to believe, what is true here about the USA is also true about any country at least in the Western world, is the exceptional power of the Jews still a myth?
And, as a consequence, is the fear of the Jews . . . something normal or abnormal?"
A Canadian senator, Joseph Landry, has put his foot in his mouth, according
to some Holocaust Promotion lobbyists, by uttering the H-word. It seems
Landry suggested accidentally that Adolf Hitler should be a role model for
policy makers when protecting citizens' safety was the issue.
Commenting on some additive to gasoline harmful to the environment, Landry
is quoted as saying: "If (Hitler) wasn't sure on MMT he would ban it
outright.''
Now you and I might think that that is a benign enough comment - not so!
For this, he speedily apologized - upon "reflection"!
His written response, according to Reuters, Feb 12, includes this:
"I made comments yesterday that were, upon reflection, wrong and
unacceptable . . . Citing Adolf Hitler to make a larger point was
inappropriate -- even though I intended in no way to imply support for Hitler or any of his own policies, which were evil and repugnant.''
An Italian proverb has it that what is born of a hen will scrape - and there
is still much scraping going on. Too much. But there are people out there
who are asking the right questions: Is our reaction to what is going on
"abnormal"?
Or is it natural and life-affirming and instinctually defensive - given
that we are beginning to perceive that what we are experiencing is ancient
- and coming to fruition?
My much-quoted, dog-eared "You Gentiles" copy by Maurice Samuels
has this to say on the matter:
"Nothing that you have ever feared from the economic tyranny of Socialism approaches the oppressive spiritual tyranny of your great democracies. These seek to control not only the acts, but the emotions of the individual. They would compel us to love and hate, to admire and despise, as part of our civic duty. . ."
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Around the inventors of new values the world revolves; invisibly it revolves."
(Friedrich Nietzsche in "On the Flies of the Marketplace")