Maybe tomorrow I will cry - but am I having fun today!
". . . I had to be a bit of a lion-tamer, showman,
chaplain, orator, sergeant, drill-master, pugilist and magician all at
once to give the speech at all.
An interesting sidelight was the three-ring circus of news coverage. One individual was denouncing me widely because, he alleged, I was "neo-nazi." Another was denouncing me for allegedly not being neo-nazi.
Another was claiming that the rally should be shunned because I was allegedly "the Klan." Another urged people to attend because I was not "the Klan." And still another was encouraging others to attend because he claimed that I was "the Klan."
Well, everybody was there, notwithstanding; our security held (though tested mightily) and I did what I said I would: face down tyranny and beat back oppression.
There was no lack of attention or controversy, which brought all eyes and ears to podium . . . "
". . . Over the years, Zundel has become something
of a household demon more reviled that Satan, thanks to a misguided campaign
that started nearly twenty years ago to get him punished for disseminating
hate ( he doesn't believe the Holocaust happened ). . ."
Next, after weaving in the obligatory slant telling Canadians yet one more time that Zundel has "zilch" credibility in Canada, Worthington then goes on to say, annulling his own disqualifier:
". . . When it's pointed out that blacks (Jamaicans?)
are convicted of more crimes than their population warrants, it's interpreted
as police harassment and a racist society targeting them . . . a case can
be made that by quoting someone like Zundel, National Geographic makes
Toronto look more tolerant of dissent and more generous in accepting divergent
viewpoints than it really is.
Ironic, because in Zundel's case even civil libertarians have difficulty defending his right to be wrong and do so only reluctantly and under duress.
In fact, we have a disquieting lynch-law attitude against those who express certain unpopular views - the antithesis of freedom of express . . . "
That one is a political sinkhole if ever there WAS a political sinkhole - as media folks are finding out - some to delight, some to despair. Keep up the Zundel-Watch on that one!
". . . The last October 28th issue of British
Columbia Report carried a one-column long letter by a "Siegfried P.
Puetz" vindicating the Revisionist viewpoint and urging its editors
to get wise to recycled, wartime Holocaust propaganda, as well as urging
its readers "not to use wildly exaggerated figures to malign identifiable
minorities in Canada, i.e. Germans. . . "
Said ADL National Director Abraham Foxman of the incident, widely described in the mainstream media:
". . . I would have thought that from the highest
levels of this country, one would have heard a voice of outrage. I don't
hear the voices of outrage, I hear excuses, and I don't see the celebration
of this security guard as a hero. . . "
Why should he be a hero? He violated his employer's security rules and compromised the reputation of the bank! A good guess is that, if properly investigated, this man might well have been an agent deliberately engaged for that task.
Foxman added to the above in not exactly opaque and cryptic words:
". . . If this had happened in the United States,
you probably would see him in the White House being thanked by the president
for saving the image and the dignity of the country. . . "
Whatever gave him THAT idea?
Too bad. And here we thought there was light at the end of the tunnel in Europe!
Writes one Swiss patriot who sent us additional information on the controversy:
"It should be clear to all that Switzerland,
as happened during 1933 in Germany, is at war against World Jewry. . .
" (translated)
". . . The subject of Holocaust revisionism
is finally seeping into publications sold in every High Street - after
decades of media near-conspiracy to block public awareness of the whole
issue, with a subsidiary position falsely maintaining that review of WWII
history was a scam operated by people who did not believe what they were
saying.
In recent weeks, the London Evening Standard has covered the topic, even listing many revisionist authors, and the titles of their books . . . The Independent also covered the growing volume of material on the subject circulating in the Middle East.
Now the mainstream monthly publication History Today has included . . . an article on French historians and revisionism in France. It discusses Roger Garaudy's new book, the Abbe Pierre affair, Professor Faurisson, and 'father of Holocaust revisionism' Paul Rassinier - himself a concentration camp inmate. Again, while admitting little, the article is a remarkable breakthrough in a lack of the usual abuse thrown against revisionists . . . "
Britain's first war crimes trial collapsed on Friday 17 January 1997 when a jury ruled that the defendant, whose last name is Serafinowicz and who is reported to have been a former commander of police in Belarus during the German rule, was found not mentally fit to be tried, (due to advanced age, no doubt) casting serious doubt over whether an alleged war criminal will EVER be brought to trial in Britain.
This case was to have been the first held under Britain's controversial War Crimes Act, passed in 1991 despite a spirited rejection and over the opposition in the House of Lords.
This War Crimes Act, under which Szymon Serafinowicz was charged in July of 1995 was one of the most controversial laws Britain ever passed. The government had to invoke a special power, not previously used for forty years, to force it through parliament after it was thrown out by the upper house of parliament, the House of Lords.
The House of Lords, which includes a large number of elderly peers who lived through the war, voted down the bill, arguing that it was unreasonable to try someone for a crime that happened half a century ago.
As all the world now knows, trials of war crimes dating from World War Two have proved equally fraught with difficulty in other countries. Priebke in Italy was one. Demjanjuk in Israel was another.
Prosecutions in Australia and Canada have also failed - at a cost of millions of dollars out of the pockets of the tax payers of these countries. Yet the "Jewish Lobby" cries out for ever more victims!
At a German-Jewish forum organized by the Bertelsmann Foundation, Kinkel assured the audience that the German government was trying to push a new law through parliament aimed at clamping down on neo-Nazis on the Internet.
"We will not allow the Internet to be used as an electronic meeting place for the extreme right wing,'' Kinkel fawned. The Bertelsmann Foundation is a non-profit organization set up by the German media group - a group which, like many others, were granted licenses to "re-educate" the conquered German population along Allied lines.
". . . You may find this pretty amazing, but
soon after the announcement that Paul Fromm was fired from his job as teacher
at the Peel Region Board of Education, in Peel Region which is a suburban/rural
municipality north of Toronto, the CBC television dramatic series BLACK
HARBOUR (Wed. Jan. 22 at 9 p.m.) is scheduling a drama about a high-school
teacher in the community who harbours Holocaust "hate" views.
. . ! "
Tsk. Tsk.
Word has come down already that the Peel Board of Education is upset and dismayed at the nationwide publicity this act of brassy censorship at the behest of the Zionist censors has unleashed. And well they should be shocked. If this Fromm case becomes another Scopes Trial - and all the ear marks are it WILL! - it will be arduous for Fromm but wondrously spectacular for our worthy cause. We at the Zundelsite predict that by the time this case is over, the opposition will not be as cocky - for they might well be liable for a few million in damages - out of their own pockets! This one won't go away that easily, for Fromm has a constituency, an organization and many, many friends.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
". . . Actually, I have seen movies about Hitler that didn't mention Jews.
And not on the Zundelsite, either. . . . "
(A post on the "fight-censorship" list)