This morning I woke up to some four pages of the January issue of "Germania"
- the German version of Ernst Zundel's monthly report to his financial and
moral supporters on what will happen next.
One of the headlines says, translated:
"Ernst Zundel is appealing to the 25 most influential global Human
Rights organizations to assist Germans, especially German Revisionists and
dissidents, to regain and retain THEIR human rights."
When Ernst first said that he was now prepared to take on the UN, most people
scoffed, and many felt that he was shifting his resources into an area made
much too slippery with droppings from those bounteous do-gooders on which
the Evil Forces slide our once-proud and accomplished Western civilization
right into the abyss.
But there is something to be said for the fastidious Zundel nose when it
comes to discerning just what it is, this time around, that's smelling up
the air.
What's in the air of late is this, condensed and partly paraphrased: (Source:
Inter Press Service via Individual Inc., 11-21-1996)
"Alarmed at the dramatic increase in racial discrimination and xenophobia worldwide, the United Nations is pushing for an international conference on racism.
'The international community cannot remain indifferent . . . to the racist ideologies being spread by the most modern information techniques," warned Maurice Glele-Ahanhanzo, U.N. Special Rapporteur on Human Rights.
Glele-Ahanhanzo said the 185-member General Assembly should not only convene 'without further delay' a world conference on racism but also explore the possibility of holding a second conference specifically on xenophobia."
Such a conference, it is held,
". . . could also examine further the question of whether the incitement of racial hatred, particularly through new information media, is justifiable under the right to freedom of speech and expression."
Based on a 24-page study on "contemporary forms of racism", the United Nations claims it is
". . . alarmed at the speed and intensity with which racial hatred is spreading along the global information superhighway. . ."
Now if you are a Zundelist, of course immediately you will assume that they must mean the Zundelsite, since they have tried their darndest to smear us with the label of "hate mongering". Read on:
"A growing trend has been observed among racist organizations to use electronic mail or the Internet to spread racist or xenophobic propaganda," the study notes.
The study next goes on to say that the United Nations blames the rise in racism on several factors - and sure enough:
'. . . including the worldwide immigration crisis and renewed denials of the existence of the Nazi holocaust."
The study also cites ". . . desecration and arson in places of worship and cemeteries."
It furthermore points out that, in the United States alone, more than 70 African-American churches have been burned down last year, ". . . at least some of them presumably by white supremacists."
Following that inflammatory, pictorial preamble you get this, in case you missed the point:
"The study cites the case of a Toronto-based extremist, Ernest (sic) Zuendel, (sic) who publishes anti-Semitic literature under such explicit titles as "Auschwitz: Myth and Reality," "The Holocaust: Let's Hear Both Sides," and "Were There Really Six Million Deaths?" (sic)
So then Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali went on to do the bidding
of the Powers That Be and sent letters to member states soliciting support
for a world conference on racism.
"Regrettably", only two countries, Denmark and Uruguay, responded.
Regrettably? To whom?
Should it not be read as "sensible" rather than "regrettable",
that only two countries responded? One might say that most national government
quite correctly read this call for examining the so-called rampant "xenophobia"
on the Internet as being a politically motivated Marxist ploy that's really
wearing thin - and just ignore the mirror-fencing exercise, having better
things to do.
The study next delves into reasons why most member states, particularly
those dependent on migrant labor, have little interest in that kind of conference,
for a variety of reasons, concluding with
". . . Thailand considers the presence of 350,000 "illegal" immigrants from Burma a threat to the country's security while South Korea has declared it will expel all "illegal immigrants" in 1999.
The same attitude toward immigration is seen in Europe, where most member states of the European Union have adopted tougher legislation."
As an example of this "major trend," the study next goes on to mourn, is
". . . the example of France which has proposed a series of measures to improve control over immigration by non-Europeans. "
"Many observers consider that these measures contravene human rights," the study notes.
It also singles out the United States where there has been "a mobilization against foreigners unprecedented since the Second World War. . . "
In other words, big racial trouble. Absolutely everywhere. Having nothing
to do with Ernst Zundel the man who voices his legitimate concerns on behalf
of his people and race - but having everything to do with one lone, inconvenient
but ever-more-quickening message adjudicating the so-called "Holocaust"
as THE convenient pretext for unmatched mischief on a global scale.
What mischief, some still ask?
INCLUDING the forced, brutal, genocidal mixing of the races so as to keep
and to exploit a cheap, convenient labor pool, thus guaranteeing a supply
of Third World slaves to take the jobs away from the First-Worlders - for
the sole benefit of some anonymous large corporations and slick banksters.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"There is much written about 'The Great Conspiracy', the New World Order, and secret organizations of one kind or another. People are asking - what is the game, and who runs it?"
(From the Introduction of "In the Beginning. . . " by R. K. Hoskins)