As I have said before, periodically I am electronically rendezvous'ed
(sp?) by members of the Nizkorites to be informed that I am this and that
- and none of it exactly flattering. I have had one such visit recently
that raised yet one more time the altogether tiresome and worn-out topic
of "debate".
Once more, and for the record: Ernst Zundel will debate. He will do so by
marshalling the finest revisionist researchers and writers to back up his
claims about the "Holocaust" as an extortion racket, and he invites
his opposition to bring their evidence that he is wrong and put it on the
table.
Such a debate should be in an appropriate forum and in a structured and
mutually respectful setting in front of the eyes of the world community,
and where there will be civilized cooperation on both sides and not shrill,
juvenile character assassination employed as the main tactic by his opposition.
And let the best man win!
Less than a week ago, Ernst faxed the following yet one more time:
The Need for a Global Holocaust Debate: An Open Challenge to the Simon Wiesenthal
Center
The Simon Wiesenthal Centre's activities in censoring their opposition on
and off the Net are becoming ever more brazen and are bordering on the illegal
or even criminal. The latest example is the Simon Wiesenthal Centre's Canadian
Director, Sol Littman, apparently officially asking CSIS, the Canadian Civilian
Spy Agency, to probe into Zundel's perfectly legitimate business affairs.
For details, see SWC Response Magazine, Summer/Fall 1996, Volume 17, No.
2.
Worldwide, freedom fighters have identified the SWC as a free speech suppression
organization, and on at least one occasion gave them an official "villains'"
award, (one of "top 20") given by the Boston Coalition for Freedom
of Expression. Details may be gleaned by going to http://www.eff.org/pub/Groups/BCFE/hervil6.html
Even before January of this year, when their censorship actions unleashed
the first world-wide cyberspace standoff that blocked 1500 sites on a California
website which housed the Zundelsite, we have been asking for an orderly,
well-monitored and scholarly debate of the Holocaut topic. We have refused
petty and irrelevant linking to trivial documents and participation in unruly
newsgroups, but Revisionists worldwide are now, as ever, more than willing
to engage in a serious, civilized and scholarly debate involving the best
experts and writers on both sides.
Just prior to this cyberspace stand-off involving Telekom of Germany, we
specifically asked the SWC for a release of copyright of their 13-point
Breitbart Document refuting Revisionism, so we could post and answer it
at least in writing. We never received a reply from the Simon Wiesenthal
Center itself.
We therefore went ahead and summarized the points they raised in a comprehensive
document which was part of the Nizkor rebuttal.
In order that Zundelsite readers may judge for themselves what the Holocaust
Lobby is up to in its world-wide campaign to silence the critics of their
nefarious activities, we suggest that you visit not only the Simon Wiesenthal
Center's website at http://www.wiesenthal.com/ but also the Anti-Defamation
League at http://www.adl.org/ and the Jewish Defense League's website at
http://www.jdl.org/ Until we have consulted legal advisors, we are not at
this time providing live links, but we suggest that readers hand-copy the
URLs provided, bookmark the three sites, and see for themselves what our
opposition has to say and to offer as explanations for the legitimacy of
the "Holocaust" - compared to why we say it's anti-German hate
propaganda deteriorated into an extortion racket.
The Simon Wiesenthal Centre knows perfectly well traditional Holocaust promoters
have no chance of winning a debate in an open, structured and fair forum.
They do not want to debate the "Holocaust" in the USA; they want
to intimidate critics with threats of boycotts and economic sanctions in
Canada and other weaker countries; and they want to criminalize and incarcerate
anybody who challenges the "Holocaust" through pernicious, repressive
"hate laws" around the world.
They keep on running to governments, whining and complaining to police and
the media; they attempt to pressure business, terrorize radio and TV stations
and/or Internet servers with fear mongering and implied threats of dire
consequences, such as loss of business through boycotts; they try to criminalize
those who blow the whistle on them, etc. (If there are any lawyers out there
reading this who would be willing to take a defensive Federal Civil Rights
case against these people for their interference with our civil rights and
contractual arrangements with radio and TV stations, please contact the
Zundel-Haus at 416-922-9850)
We want readers of the Zundelsite to take a serious look at the Simon Wiesenthal
Center's activities and critically analyze what they have to say, what they
have already done, and what they want various governments around the world
to do to curtail freedom on the Internet. Don't be deceived by their honeyed
words - that's merely sugar-coating the poisoned pill of censorship. Stripped
of the Talmudic double-speak rhetoric, which masquerades suppression of
truthful information of their unconscionable Holocaust exploitation, there
will be very little credibility left to their arguments about the so-called
"Holocaust". After all, a lie repeated six million, or even six
billion times, does not turn into a truth by mere repetition.
After you have visited their site, check out their magazine "Response"
for good measure. Browse through the back issues of the last 2-3 years,
where they brag about their achievements at stifling the free speech and
free debate of others around the planet. Then come back to our site and
compare, and you will know why the Simon Wiesenthal Center feels a need
to censor truth tellers!
Ernst Zundel has been on record for over two decades advocating a televised
symposium (nationally or even globally!) of pro- and anti-Holocaust researchers.
Such a debate should be well-structured and moderated, much like a presidential
debate. An alternative approach would be to establish a neutral commission
of experts drawn from many countries around the world to examine the controversy
of the so-called "Holocaust" - with access to the archives and
files of the Arolson International Tracing Service.
Ernst Zundel has repeatedly asked the world to get involved in asking firmly
for such an independent and neutral inquiry. Fifty years of anti-German
hate mongering by these Holocaust Lobbyists is enough! Revisionists want
a structured, live debate and not a nihilistic newsgroup shouting match
of verbal abuse and character assassination mislabeled as "debate",
which the Nizkor site has pushed since its inception and which Ernst Zundel
has resisted for sound reasons.
We ask readers to re-read the entire reasoned correspondence preceding the
first-ever world-wide cyberspace stand-off material. It is available at
http://www.webcom.com/ezundel/english/05.nizkor/sm_pic.html
Judge for yourself how hard we tried to get the Nizkor site to debate, since
we could not even get a declining letter from the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
Since Nizkor objected even to the term "debate" and only tried
to scream us down or run us ragged, we started the "66 QA" as
a unilateral response and called it the "Rebuttal Documents".
They can be found at the bottom of http://www.webcom.com/ezundel/english/05.nizkor/sm_pic.html
We see these rebuttals as a mere beginning. We will certainly update our
responses with the latest scientific and historical information as soon
as it becomes available.
Ernst Zundel
October 15, 1996
Thought for the Day:
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought."
(Albert Szent-Gyoergyi)