September 18, 1996

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:


Ernst, who lives up to his name, being earnest most if not all of the time, sometimes chides me for being too chatty. Intermittently, therefore, I shall dispense the traditional fare of the stuff of which ground-breaking history was made when Ernst was first hauled into court in 1985 for daring to be blasphemous about the Holocaust.

Today is my day to be solemn.

For Old-timers, this will be "old hat", but perhaps it bears repeating for those new to the struggle, of whom I have many on my ever-swelling list. Please ponder that, with no scientific evidence whatsoever to back up the gas chamber claim, the testimony of Holocaust "survivors" becomes vital to proving the "gassings" at Auschwitz.

How reliable is their testimony? Take a minute to judge for yourself:

According to an August 1986 article in the Jerusalem Post: "Many were never in the places where they claim to have witnessed atrocities, while others relied on second-hand information given them by friends or passing strangers" according to Krakowski. Over half of 20,000 survivor accounts were found by Yad Vashem to be "unreliable" and "inaccurate."

Have you heard of "Brentar's Dog", whose name was entered as a "victim"?

Ingrid

Thought for the Day:

"Truth is never alone; to know one will require the knowledge of many. They hang together in a chain of mutual dependence; you cannot draw one link without many others."

(Joseph Glanvill in "The Vanity of Dogmatizing")



Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com

Back to Table of Contents of the Sept. 1996 ZGrams