July 20, 1996

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:


Ernst tells me that the term ZOG was born out of important literary work at the Zndel-Haus in the 1970s by an American writer named Eric Thompson who had attended US spy schools and who later returned to the USA.

ZOG stands, of course, for "Zionist Occupation Government," connoting the common perception that what we are seeing in this global struggle for control for man's mind comes from the highest governmental levels.

Certainly here in America, the term ZOG is now in the public domain, and people who would violently disagree with what Revisionists are saying have little trouble with ZOG as a valid concept and construct.

We even have books by that title. You see it on T-Shirts and bumper stickers. In weeks and months to come, you will see ZOG used ever more frequently by writers because it has entered popular speech and parlance in the USA and Canada. It is very much part of the vocabulary of the alternative media and is now filtering into lapdog media dispatches.

In the ZGram below and in ZGrams to come, I will use ZOG as a summarizing word tool, much in the way "The Flower Generation" might describe the hippies of the 60's, and "The Jet Set" the lifestyle of the rich.

I hasten to add that logic dictates that not everybody who was young in the 60's was a Flower Child, and not everybody rich indulges in the Jet Set lifestyle. Similarly, not every Jew is part of ZOG - but many influential ones are, and when writers like myself use this term, not only are these Jews addressed but also, let's be very clear! their nest-fouling toadies, lackeys and yes-men who come out of the Aryan ranks.

ZOG has been doing something very clever in the consistent pairing of the words: "Pornography-and-Neo-Nazi" or its derivatives. In Canada, for instance, you have "Pornography-and-Hate-Literature Units" in the Police Force, and Canada Customs equates anyone who has any Revisionist views with sexual perverts of the worst kind.

The idea is to make unwary people think that the two go together and one means practically the other. This jingle will fix in all-too-many people's minds a firm mental picture of smut, just as the pairing of "Judeo-Christian" will call forth tolerance for non-Christian ideas and attitudes (or so ZOG hopes!) and "Law-and-Order" will make us think that one equals the other.

Of course we know better, but the consistent pairing of two words is a psychologically very powerful shortcut toward a politically desirable end. You learn that by studying Guthrie in Psych 101.

So what is is happening if people are repeatedly subjected to the linguistic shortcut "Pornography and Neo-Naziism"? "Pornography and anti-Semitism"? "Pornography and hate-mongering?"

I'll tell you by example by using a vivid vignette for illustration purposes, again in my favorite way - via fable.

The parable below is borrowed from Jrgen Graf who told it at the 1994 Annual IHR Conference where he gave a fine and thoughtful presentation. I understand this speech is in the November/December 1995 IHR Journal, but it is not yet on-line. (We will have it shortly in German, and it is well worth reading).

This fable has it that once upon a time there was a bird who was happily brooding his eggs. This bird was trusting, humble and complacent, and did not notice that his eggs were stolen by the fox.

This fox, in his devious ways, tried to cover his theft and replaced the stolen eggs with stones, in the dark of the night, one rock at a time. This bird - I bet you he was Aryan! - had no idea what had happened and kept on spreading his protective wings, confident that those hard rocks would in due time turn into a fine set of chicks.

The fox, however, had an enemy, who told the bird that rocks were rocks, took them away, and gave him back his eggs, all in one happy swoop.

You would have thought the bird would have been overjoyed!

Not so. The bird had been habituated to his rocks.

The bird went absolutely crazy and started attacking the "unfamiliar" eggs, dancing and screeching and flapping his wings, and even attacking the man who had picked off the fox - because no fox, no rocks!

It's hard to let go of illusions. Saul Bellow has said that a great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.

Of course the question is: How long will it take for the bird to realize that he has been brooding on rocks?

Ingrid

Thought for the day:

"Man is ready to die for an idea, provided that idea is not quite clear to him."

Anatole France



Back to Table of Contents of the July 1996 ZGrams