Copyright (c) 2001 - Ingrid A. Rimland


ZGram: Where Truth is Destiny

 

September 24, 2001

 

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

 

One of the by-products of the September 11 tragedy is that it helps to percolate to the top all kinds of revisionist comparisons.

Now that the war drums are droning over all the networks and polls tell us that more than 80 % of people polled are roaring to go to war, perhaps this writer below can give us a moment's reflection.

Here are ZGram columnist Ian Macdonald's comments:

[Start]

Ingrid - this is my response to some Churchill quotes on the aol message board today ("we shall fight on the beaches" etc as if 9/11 were equivalent to the Battle of Britain)

Dear Phyllis - I see that you are an admirer of Winston Churchill. Good Old Winnie was once my Hero but I now realize that, aside from his highly quotable oratory, he contributed nothing of value to Western civilization, in fact was the chief architect of its demise. He betrayed his country into third class status (and ultimate oblivion) when he rejected Germany's offer of an honourable peace in 1940 thus condemning millions of worthy Christian servicemen and civilians on both sides to unnecessary death and hardship and precipitating the loss of Britain's overseas assets accumulated over centuries of enterprise, investment and sacrifice.

Much worse, by advocating and continuing the war against our natural ally Germany when clearly Stalin was the real enemy, Churchill facilitated not only the victory of atheistic communism over all of Eastern Europe, China, Indo-China etc but also the Zionist conquest of Palestine - major tragedies for the millions who lost their freedom, property and in many cases their lives, as a result.

Furthermore, it was Churchill who ordered the terror bombing of civilian targets in Germany, incinerating almost a million innocent Christian women, children and elderly persons on the sordid pretext that the barbaric slaughter would demoralize the soldiers at the front (most of whom were struggling courageously to defend Europe from the most bloodthirsty tyrant who ever walked the earth, namely Stalin).

It would be comforting to think that Churchill had acted in good faith and sincerely believed in what he was doing, however it is well known from his public statements in the 'twenties and 'thirties that he recognized communism as the major threat to Western democracy. Why he actively campaigned for war against Germany may be explained by his close relationship with Bernard Baruch, the Jewish American tycoon and Presidential advisor who rescued Churchill from bankruptcy and loss of his family estate. The Jews, having been expelled from Germany, had already declared war on their former hosts and were thirsting for revenge, prefersably without risk to themselves, if it could be arranged. It is not inconceivable therefore that the financial bailout had some serious strings attached.

In retrospect the best that can be said of Churchill is that he was a magnificent orator who inspired his listeners to acts of self-sacrifice and courage, albeit in a lost cause. The worst that can be said is that he was a self-aggrandizing megalomaniac and charlatan who consciously betrayed his country in the service of an alien anti-Christian minority and was thus a traitor to all the values he pretended to defend. He is credited with winning the war when in fact we lost virtually everything we sought to preserve, not least of all our peace and security, as recent events clearly confirm.

[End]


Thought for the Day:

"It appears from the TV coverage that Americans go blank when others are being bombed and cannot believe it when they are."

{Letter to the Zundelsite)

hought for the Day: acdonald'si


Back to Table of Contents of the September 2001 ZGrams