Copyright (c) 2001 - Ingrid A. Rimland


ZGram: Where Truth is Destiny

 

May 11, 2001

 

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

 

A few days ago a Revisionist who is rather new to the struggle wrote to the Zundelsite for information about what to do with a new "documentary" a woman named "Gould" had seen on TV about some new "evidence" connected to Eichmann - which proved in her mind that "Holocaust Deniers" were on the wrong track.

Here is my answer - learned in the minefield of the Nizkorites. I think all Revisionists ought to take it to heart.

It is no longer our duty, if it ever was, to argue something that has long been settled. Whoever makes the claim of "genocide" or "gassings" or whatever bizarre tale strikes anybody's fancy ought to deliver evidence of that claim. It is a truism that one can't prove a negative.

[START]

We absolutely must resist being sucked into every new lie, every wild and unsubstantiated claim, every new "document" and "documentary" these people will dream up to keep us hopping and spinning. It will never ever end - we have to resist that tactic. It is a tactic to keep us busy and on the defensive.

The basic facts around Eichmann are these:

Eichmann was forcibly kidnapped, held for years in solitary confinement, the Israelis had total control over what he got to read, what documents he was given, what he ate, drank and what medicines he took. Israeli behavior toward ordinary Palestinian demonstrators is awful - imagine the "special treatment" they would mete out to a guy like Eichmann whom they call the "architect of the final solution"?

Whatever he may have said or written under these prison conditions is worthless - he simply was no longer a credible historical source, much less a believable witness.

Secondly, there was recently the London Trial of David Irving where, toward the end, the so-called "Eichmann Diaries" surfaced. Had there been the slightest evidence of this newest claim, it would have been trumpeted to the sky. There was nothing incriminating or even of interest in those diaries.

It is not our job to answer every new Jewish claim with exhaustive, time-consuming and expensive research. The basic work has been done. We are way, way past this stage. We are willing to debate the Holocaust claims openly and fairly on an international, neutral forum, but to answer every silly individual claim of every kook just drains our energy and our resources. We have done that for years, and now it is time to move on and to instrumentalize what Revisionist research has found - to stop the brutalities that are inflicted on the claim of a false genocide story.

Revisionist research has proven that Germany had no government policy to exterminate Jews or anybody else on racial, cultural or religious criteria. Leuchter, Rudolf, Lüftl all independently examined the so-called gas chambers. They are fakes. No gassings took place. So there is no policy, no murder weapon, no evidence of remains, existing crematory capacity could not have handled that many corpses.

Some time ago a so-called "German documentary film maker" was arrested who was quite popular with mainstream media. He admitted that he staged and faked these documentaries. He is merely one of many.

We have the historical, forensic, logistical answers to the Holocaust Lobby's false, mendacious claims. We have done the "archeolical digs" - there is no need to excavate the same site over and over and over again. If they come up with a new lie - and they are exceedingly good at that - we just walk around them. We don't do them the favor of replying to something that has been settled once and for all.

I think an answer to the Gould letter would be to urge her to help us get a debate in an open forum going if she has any doubts.

Frankly, this letter is a thinly veiled attempt to frighten you off from investigating the tabu. If they had nothing to fear, they would encourage you to continue your research to find them innocent.

[END]


Thought for the Day:

"This is the way the history of the Second World War would have been written if the wrong side had won."

(A London Evening Standard Reviewer commenting on David Irving's "Churchill's War, vol. II")


Thank you for subscribing to the Zgrams. Please go to vho.org/mlm to add your name to the list.

If you want to be removed from our list, please go to vho.org/mlm, enter your email, and remove yourself from the list.

Webmaster www.zundelsite.org

Back to Table of Contents of the May 2001 ZGrams