In the Federal Republic of Germany, Attorneys are on trial for daring to defend their clients with relevant submissions!

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

-- 




Ingrid Zundel's preface to the report below:

In 2005, Zundel Defense Attorney Sylvia Stolz tried to submit 
forensic evidence as well as pertinent documents to defend my 
husband's politically incorrect views, but was forbidden to do so and 
physically carried out of the court room on orders of the presiding 
judge.

That must have been a "first" for Germany!

Neither Ernst nor I approved of the theatrics that happened at the 
beginning of this Soviet-style show trial about the "Holocaust" - 
and we were shocked and, frankly, horrified that she had signed one 
of her submissions on behalf of my husband with "Heil Hitler!"  It 
was done without our knowledge and approval, utterly unnecessary - 
and very hurtful to Ernst's case and reputation in the end.

However, having said that, I want to go on record stating that I know 
Sylvia to be courageous and defiant, saying things in court, now in 
her own defense, that sorely needed to be said in that downtrodden, 
beaten country, still under the whip of its Zionist foes.

I urge every German patriot who reads this report to support Sylvia 
Stolz financially and morally.

=====


Day 6 of the "Holocaust" Trial of Attorney Sylvia Stolz in Mannheim 
District Court, 29 November 2007.


****************

Reported by Günter Deckert
Translated by J. M. Damon

Sylvia the Proud

What's in a name? Quite a lot, especially if you are a Bavarian 
attorney and your name is Sylvia Stolz. "Stolz" means "proud" in 
German, and that describes Sylvia very well: proud and undaunted.

In the face of disbarment and imprisonment for defending German 
thought-criminals, her head is bloody but unbowed. No wonder her 
supporters call her "the German Joan of Arc."

****************


Scheduled for 9 am, proceedings begin at 9:05 in a smaller courtroom.

There are the usual security checks with x-ray equipment, etc. but no 
incidents. The other courtrooms in Mannheim Court House do not carry 
out such security checks, but this one is used to conduct trials for 
violent crimes, grievous bodily harm, drugs, etc. Eight policemen are 
present along with three Staschu (political police, today's 
counterpart of the old Stasi from DDR days) and one bailiff.  Two 
police vehicles are parked in front of the courthouse. The court is 
present in its usual composition: Judge Glenz, District Attorney 
Grossmann and Sylvia Stolz with Attorney Bock as well as her court 
appointed lawyer. Horst Mahler is present as visitor. There is one 
very young female reporter from the dpa (Deutsche Presse-Agentur.) 
The media are boycotting the trial except for passing on politically 
correct clichés such as "Rightwing Extremist," "Holocaust Denier," 
"Neo-Nazi," etc. There are also several very young female observers, 
perhaps students or apprentices. In addition there are around 30 
visitors who come and go throughout the day. They are exasperated 
because the sound system is either out of order or turned off for the 
day, making it nearly impossible to hear what is said. In addition, 
Judge Glenz is speaking unusually softly, apparently on purpose. The 
visitors have to listen very attentively to hear anything at all, and 
for that reason the courtroom is remarkably quiet.

The proceedings begin with a brief dispute between Sylvia and Judge 
Glenz over his most recent ruling. He tells her that he sees no 
reason to change his decision. Attorney Bock contradicts him, 
pointing out in detail that he is constantly interrupting Sylvia and 
refusing to allow her to speak, which is unworthy of a court in a 
lawful society. At 9:10 the Court recesses to confer and resumes at 
9:40. Previous to this, Sylvia made a motion that she be reimbursed 
for travel expenses, since she no longer has a source of income. The 
Court's decision: Nein!

Sylvia then points out that the Court is doing everything it can to 
shut her up. She remarks that harboring doubts about "Holocaust" has 
become a thought crime in Germany. She again alludes to the 
never-ending foreign occupation and domination and observes that 
today the Jews rule all nations everywhere through their vassals. 
Racial mixing, which they promote for everyone except themselves, 
means the extinction of European ethnicity, while phony Jewish 
"democracy" and their perverted version of "human rights" (except for 
freedom of speech and opinion) result in bondage and Jewish rule: 
they are in fact Jewish inventions.

Sylvia points out that in every nation, the Jews have created a state 
within a state, with non Jews serving as Nutzvieh (useful animals), 
as is well demonstrated in Jewish laws and writings. She again quotes 
extensively from Jewish writings in support of Jewish supremacism, 
then she reminds the Court that it would not  allow her to read from 
the speech of Harold Pinter, a Jewish winner of the Nobel Prize and 
an outspoken critic of Zionist American imperialism. Perhaps the 
following is the passage that Sylvia wished to quote in order to 
illustrate the nature of Zionist American hegemony:

"I have said earlier that the United States is now totally frank 
about putting its cards on the table. That is the case. Its official 
declared policy is now defined as 'full spectrum dominance'. That is 
not my term, it is theirs. 'Full spectrum dominance' means control of 
land, sea, air and space and all attendant resources. The United 
States now occupies 702 military installations throughout the world 
in 132 countries, with the honorable exception of Sweden, of course. 
We don't quite know how they got there but they are there all right.

"The United States possesses 8,000 active and operational nuclear 
warheads. Two thousand are on hair trigger alert, ready to be 
launched with 15 minutes warning. It is developing new systems of 
nuclear force, known as bunker busters. The British, ever 
cooperative, are intending to replace their own nuclear missile, 
Trident. Who, I wonder, are they aiming at? Osama bin Laden? You? Me? 
Joe Dokes? China? Paris? Who knows? What we do know is that this 
infantile insanity - the possession and threatened use of nuclear 
weapons - is at the heart of present American political philosophy. 
We must remind ourselves that the United States is on a permanent 
military footing and shows no sign of relaxing it. Many thousands, if 
not millions, of people in the United States itself are demonstrably 
sickened, shamed and angered by their government's actions, but as 
things stand they are not a coherent political force - yet. But the 
anxiety, uncertainty and fear, which we can see growing daily in the 
United States, is unlikely to diminish."

  Sylvia then moves on to ask a question that also puzzles her 
supporters: if the Court is so intent on expediting proceedings and 
avoiding her "circumlocutions", why did it set aside 20 days on the 
court calendar for this show trial? Judge Glenz then reprimands 
Sylvia, saying that her presentation does not respond to the 
disapproval expressed by the Court. She denies this and reminds the 
Court that this is the 3rd day of her defense presentation, therefore 
she cannot be interrupted and her testimony cannot be shortened or 
abrogated.

She says it has become obvious that the honorable presiding judge is 
not concerned about the length of her presentation, but rather its 
contents. Judge Glenz allows her to continue. She points out that 
people have a right to know what the expression "human rights" means 
to the Jews: namely the total plundering of non Jews and the 
imposition of Talmudic supremacism.

  At 9:46 Judge Glenz again interrupts Sylvia and announces that he is 
now imposing a time limit on her presentations: he definitively and 
conclusively forbids her to continue speaking. She ignores his 
ultimatum and continues introducing exhibits regarding the recent 
decision of the Spanish High Court that decriminalizes dissenting 
opinions on "Holocaust." She points out that the Spanish decision is 
posted on the Internet for all to read, and suggests that her 
exhibits will help the Mannheim District Court reach a proper 
verdict.  Sylvia and Attorney Bock both rebuke the court for 
constantly retreating to chambers. It does not have to recess for a 
conference; the judges can discuss the matter in the courtroom. They 
demand an open and proper ruling by the judges.

  Since Sylvia is no longer allowed to give oral testimony, but only 
to submit written documents, the attendant judge on the right of 
Judge Glenz asks Sylvia what sort of supporting (individual) 
documents she wishes to submit. Sylvia then hands over two large 
files of copies as well as two packets containing copies of Germar 
Rudolf's "Lectures on the Holocaust" [posted on the Internet at 
<www.vho.org/GB/Books/loth/#download>].

The Court then recesses from 10:30 until 11.07.

After recess the Court announces that Sylvia will be limited in her 
defense to two hours, which may be extended at the pleasure of the 
Court. Judge Glenz then gives an oral summarization of Sylvia's 
testimony, mentioning Jewish domination of Germany; "Holocaust" and 
the reasons why she doubts its authenticity; forensic evidence that 
"Holocaust" could not have occurred as officially promulgated; "OMF" 
and the foundation of Germany's present Basic Law; the Talmudic 
assumption that only Jews are human and non Jews are mere animals; 
and the function of the United Nations in eliminating national 
characteristics, with the result that today's young Germans have been 
brainwashed into no longer wanting to be German. At 11:26 Judge Glenz 
finishes reading the Court's "muzzle" ruling and has copies 
distributed to the individual members. Concerning Sylvia's motion for 
compensation for travel expenses now that she has no source of 
income, the judge remarks that she must fill out applications and 
submit documentations for expenses.

Sylvia now points out to the Court that she is faced with an entirely 
new situation, since she has been limited to two hours in which to 
present her case. This is an impossible task, as the Court well 
knows. Attorney Bock makes the motion that proceedings be 
discontinued and the Court adjourned for the day, since the Defense 
needs time to consult and reorganize. Judge Glenz totally ignores 
this motion! At 11:33 he orders a two hour recess for the noonday 
meal. After that, events move very rapidly. After lunch, Judge Glenz 
informs Sylvia that compensation for travel expenses is available 
only for destitute persons. She will have to fill out a written 
application and provide documentation.

Sylvia then complains about the Court's "muzzle order" restricting 
her presentation to two hours. She points out that placing an 
arbitrary time limit on her argumentation, after having set aside 20 
days for her trial, is an unjust and illegal denial of her right to 
present her case, it is in fact a Talmudic denial of her right to 
defend herself. She observes that Judge Glenz is living in the Judaic 
world, whereas she lives in the German world. She observes that in 
the Mannheim court the District Attorney does not have to lift a 
finger in order to gain convictions, since the judges conduct the 
prosecution. It is the same situation that prevailed in the Allied 
military tribunal in Nuremberg, in which the American Judge Jackson 
refused to allow Hermann Goering to speak.

She defiantly announces that, since two hours are totally inadequate 
for the presentation of her defense, she grants these two hours to 
the Right Honorable Presiding Judge to use as he sees fit! At 1:42 pm 
the Court again recesses for 5 minutes to confer, then announces the 
end of proceedings for the day.

Sylvia's trial will continue on Tuesday, December 4th at 9:00 am, at 
which time, in accordance with Section 249 of the Penal Code, it will 
take evidence in Selbstleseverfahren (procedure of reading into the 
official public court record, since German courts do not keep 
complete records of proceedings.) These witnesses will be called: 
Presiding Judge Meinerzhagen, the specialist in "Holocaust Denial" 
who conducted Ernst Zündel's trial; also a female judge from Berlin 
who presided over a case in which Sylvia represented the defense.

****************
Some observations by your reporter:
During today's proceedings it became very clear that Judge Glenz is 
"pulling out all the stops" in order to terminate this trial as 
quickly as possible.

The brief mention in the issue of 30 November of Manheimer Morgen, on 
page 3, is representative of the coverage of Sylvia's  trial in 
Germany's "poodle press:"

Stolz Trial to Move Forward

The trial of Sylvia Stolz in Mannheim District Court for Incitement 
of the Masses will now continue with normal witness testimony. On the 
fifth trial day, Judge Rolf Glenz repeatedly warned the accused to 
restrict her testimony to the points of her indictment. Yesterday 
Stolz, an attorney who has defended several Rightwing Extremists, 
continued repeating the Holocaust Lie, however. Judge Glenz finally 
limited her testimony to two hours, which Stolz then refused to 
accept.

====

Notice that I wrote this report today based on descriptions by a 
friend who attended the trial, to whom I am very grateful. As I 
mentioned previously, I myself was unable to attend this session. I 
returned last night shortly before 12 pm from the Deutsches Haus in 
Erzgebirge to find 240 messages in my computer, in addition to this 
report.

These reports on the Stolz trial are neither a simultaneous 
transcription nor a complete account of everything that was said. 
They reflect my personal impressions as I experienced them. I ask 
that whoever refers to these reports, in whole or in part, include my 
name as the author.

Please consider that compiling these reports takes at least four 
hours of my time. Driving to and from Mannheim takes even longer and 
in addition, costs considerable money. I can donate my time but money 
is very scarce. Every trip to Mannheim including gasoline, parking 
and a light lunch costs me around 35 Euros. If you are able to make a 
small contribution to help offset these expenses, I ask that you 
transfer the amount to:

Konto 134345-754/G. Deckert – Postbank KA, BLZ 660 100 75, Vermerk „LG MA/SSt."
Thanks!

  ****************


Günter Deckert
Weinheim an der Bergstraße, den 2. Dezember 2007




Looking for last minute shopping deals? 
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping>Find 
them fast with Yahoo! Search.