Impolitce Conservatism

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

-- 






http://zionistwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/impolite-conservatism.html

Impolite Conservatism

By Patrick Grimm


If you turn on your AM radio, you will get a mental picture as well 
as an audio earful of the haggard, tired face of American 
"conservatism" in all its mediocre malsplendor (which is a word I 
just coined, fusing together malformed and splendor). Everything 
related to the American brand of supposed cutting-edge "conservative" 
thought (or groupthink) is polite, archaically out-dated and 
washed-up. Rush Limbaugh, once the poster boy for a new style of 
radio, iconoclastic as it jeered liberal sacred cows, now seems 
recycled and a format out of steam and any fresh ideas. It's just 
Republicans vs. Democrats in all its knee-jerk and unthinking 
staleness, rehashed again and again and again. What amazes me is that 
people still digest this drivel with a straight face almost as if 
they are actually digesting profundities rather than banalities, 
banalities that ceased to be relevant a long time ago.

The most unsettling aspect of "conservative" talk radio is the 
utterly polite nature of it. Not only are the pundits, Limbaugh, 
Hannity and O'Reilly predictable, they are so boring and 
"paint-by-numbers" that you can anticipate their position on any 
given issue before the words even leave their mouths, spewing the 
public airwaves with silliness and anti-thought. What transpires on 
AM radio is not a real intellectual process, but a series of what I 
would deem "postures and gestures" signifying little or anything more 
than the host's delight in hearing his own voice. It's polite, 
polite, polite, which means that it's vanilla, and a vanilla that has 
been sitting on the counter of Baskin-Robbins a few days before 
consumption.

What we need is a new conservative movement in this country, what I 
will christen an "impolite conservative movement" that is unafraid of 
defying convention and the big guns of both parties. In fact, the 
two-party system and their antiquated platforms would have to be 
discarded completely by this new "impolite conservatism" I am 
attempting to flesh out. What would be some of the public positions 
that would be seen as "impolite" by the Establishment? Allow me to 
list them.

Patrick Grimm's Impolite Conservatism

1. Pro-European-American

For once, just once, conservatism would revert back to its paleo 
roots. This would mean that white people would dare to be "impolite" 
to the Jewish media and dare to agitate for their own interests, 
without apology, without equivocation and without hesitation. We 
would oppose immigration, not because it hurts our economy or saps 
our social services or opens us to terror threats. These are all 
phony and limp-wristed reasons given by frightened white politicians 
for opposing the immigrant invasion.

We would give a big middle finger to the Jewsmedia and say in a loud 
voice and with a hard and grim (or perhaps Grimm) expression "We want 
an America with a white majority! We are not going to be displaced! 
We, the white people founded this country and we are going to control 
our own nation! That means we are going back to a pro-European 
immigration policy, one not decided by Jews! We will not be invaded, 
displaced or shoved aside! We will have an America based on the 
principles of our Founders!"

If enough white people and white politicians spoke this way, the 
Zionist media would have to back off and they would know that they 
could no longer stigmatize and frighten us. Whites could become as 
galvanized and organized for their concerns as every other group.

2. America First

In an "impolite" conservative world, taking an America First position 
on all matters, foreign and domestic would mean no wars in Iraq, 
Afghanistan or Iran. It would mean that the altar of free trade 
worshipped by the neo-con one-worlder Mammonites would be pulled to 
the ground. It would signify the death knell for the Federal Reserve 
and American involvement with the World Bank. It would signal a 
policy shift from what's good for Tel Aviv to what's good for the 
United States. It would require a move from constant and over weaning 
interventionism to a clear-eyed and cautious semi-isolationism.

3. Revived Anti-Zionism

This is the area where being "impolite" is really the only way to 
travel. Impolite conservatives would recognize the dangers of 
supporting the crooked and two-faced state of Israel, both because of 
the higher oil prices we pay as punishment from the Arab world and 
the ensuing Muslim terrorism stirred like a boiling cauldron by our 
dishonest brokering efforts in the MidEast peace process, resulting 
in Americans being further imperiled.

Impolite conservatives would shoot down every media push for more 
foreign imperialist adventurism for the Israeli common good, which 
always results in the American bad. Israel would fight her own wars 
with no assistance from our American men and women.

Israel would be defunded entirely. We would rip the hungry Hebrew 
mouth from the American teat and make the Israelis get their funding 
from their shylock friends in the Rothschild banking family. No more 
military technology would be sent to a state intent on stealing and 
selling our secrets to the enemy, profiting over and over again from 
our naivety and good will.

The Jewish media monopoly would be broken through strict and 
unflinching anti-monopoly laws. Impolite conservatives would protest 
loudly that the incestuous relationship between Israeli interest 
groups like AIPAC and the Jewish media machine be ended yesterday.

Campaign finance reform laws would be passed and strictly upheld with 
severe penalties meted out to those who broke them. Political 
campaigns would all be funded from the public purse, thus ending the 
spigot of ill-gotten Jewish money that now buys up the politicians of 
their choice who are then pressured into upholding every dot and 
tittle of the dirty Zionist agenda.

STOP BEING POLITE!

These are a few "impolite" things that seem to be woefully missing 
from today's almost Victorianly-polite conservative movement. The 
fact remains that today's conservatives are much too genteel and weak 
in the knees to get behind the things I have espoused above. They 
won't stand for us, which means that they don't deserve any support 
from us, financially, morally or what have you.

Let's take the "politeness" out of the picture and get as "impolite", 
pushy and unapologetic in the interests of European-Americans as Jews 
get when their little paper tiger feelings get bruised or even nudged 
by truth-trumpeters and patriotic honesty-mongers. Let us dispense 
with the vanilla and French vanilla pigeonholes that have served us 
so disreputably in the past and originate and author a new "impolite" 
and empowering philosophy that removes us from the back of the line. 
Our interests, our freedoms and our future have been placed on the 
backburner for too many years. "Impolite paleoconservatism" 
implemented to the hilt will put us back where we belong, as masters 
in our own house. If that means tossing our Jewish landlords to the 
curb, then so be it. They've been raising the rent on us for too long 
anyway.