Mathaba: Iran Revolution ends the 'Holocult'

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

Iran Revolution ends the 'Holocult'
Posted: 2006/12/17
From: Mathaba

Dr. Sahib M. Bleher writes that the Iran conference on the Holocaust 
cuts the Achilles heel of the current Anglo-Zionist world order

By Dr. Sahib Mustaqim Bleher

The Iranians may not even be aware of it, but their hosting of the 
recent Holocaust conference may prove to be the most important 
milestone in their history since the Islamic Revolution under 
Khomeini. Western politicians and media certainly grasped the 
significance of the event, with Germany's premier Merkel standing 
shoulder to shoulder with prime minister Olmert of the 
"only-democracy-in-the-middle-east-that-is-not-a-democracy" - the 
apartheid state of Israel - and with BBC television news presenting 
the bizarre spectacle of discussing, rather than reporting on, an 
alleged anti-Semitic conference whilst the images in the background 
showed traditionally clad Orthodox Jews happily in attendance.

When the Islam-hating Western media attacked the prophet Muhammad 
under the pretence of freedom of speech, Iran retaliated by testing 
the limits of those freedoms with its own holocaust cartoon 
competition. In doing so they stumbled across the most jealously 
guarded dogma of secular Western society, the Holocult.

Whereas questioning and reviling religious beliefs is almost a 
cornerstone underpinning the mindset of those societies, even genuine 
historical research into the subject of a subsection of the 60 
million who died in the second world war is prohibited and most 
certainly leads to being ostracised in public: The suffering of the 
Jews may not be questioned since

"if it were to be proven that "The Holocaust" has, in fact, been 
stage-managed for political reasons in order to promote Israeli 
interests, then the State of Israel and the United States as public 
players, and the global Zionist organizations as private lobbying 
entities would have to accept their share of responsibility for the 
damage, suffering and hardship they have wrought upon the Middle East 
and the world and, accordingly, they should be held accountable."

The latter is a quote from communiqué no. 16 of Argentina's growing 
opposition movement MSRA or Argentine Second Republic Movement, who 
intend to host a Holocaust conference of their own in order to 
examine how the Holocaust has been used propagandistically for 
political ends following the end of World War II.

Rather than a one-off event, the Tehran conference is the beginning 
of the unravelling of the special status that Israel and Zionist Jews 
enjoy in the world justified by their special suffering at the hands 
of the Germans. The issue is not whether Jews suffered during World 
War II but that this suffering has been exploited since, in what 
Finkelstein called the "Holocaust Industry".

For the last half century, only Jews and retired politicians, the 
latter in their memoirs, were permitted to voice criticism of Israel 
and the Zionist lobby. Meanwhile, with some historical distance, many 
more people are demanding to have a say in the matter, although 
others, like the Muslim American Society (MAS) Freedom Foundation, 
feel the need to curry favour by stating "True Muslims must never 
deny the Holocaust" and in the words of Ibrahim Ramey, the Director 
of their Human and Civil Rights Division: "The evidence of this 
crime, and the horrible magnitude of this killing, is irrefutable. 
From sources as varied as Nazi war records, film documentation, and 
most importantly, the testimony of survivors and witnesses, we know 
that the mass murder of European Jews was, indeed, the single 
greatest crime of genocide in the twentieth century." - whereas the 
communiqué from Argentina questions why, if World War II cost more 
than 60 million lives in Europe and Asia, mankind's attention is 
almost solely focused on the suffering of 10% of those victims and 
millions have been added since then "including almost 2 million 
Iraqis killed by the Bush Family and their Associates since the First 
Gulf War in 1991 to date".

Recognising that the label of unique suffering can no longer be worn 
unchallenged, researchers who questioned certain aspects of the 
official holocaust story were convicted in political show trials as a 
warning to others: in France Robert Faurisson or Roger Garaudy, the 
latter for his substantive book The Founding Myths of Modern Israel, 
in Austria David Irving, in Australia Fredrick Toeben, in Germany 
Germar Rudolf and Ernst Zundel. But with Iran state-sponsoring a 
conference on the subject and inviting eminent Rabbis to attend, all 
this effort has come to naught. The topic will not go away and 
awkward questions are going to be asked.

As a gentile European I may not ask these questions without penalty, 
but Rabbi Moishe Arye Friedman, chief Rabbi of the Orthodox 
anti-Zionist Jewish Community in Vienna, Austria, did not prostrate 
before the God of Zion and did not hesitate to attend the Tehran 
conference decried by the Muslim American Society as immoral and 
motivated by racial hatred. In his address to the conference he 
stated that the founder of the Zionism, Theodor Herzl, already spoke 
in his first diaries of a number of six million Jews who were 
allegedly threatened in Europe and that, according to Herzl, the 
so-called Jewish state would only have a chance if there was a 
disaster for these six million European Jews, as well as that the 
Bolshevists and the British government already used the six million 
figure in their war propaganda against Germany during the first world 
war. He further talked about the collaboration between the Nazis and 
the Zionists, and added that he was sure that the last word about the 
real or actual number of the victims had not yet been spoken, 
mentioning that in 1990 the number originally specified of four 
million victims of Auschwitz had been reduced to approximately 
900,000 to 1.1 million whilst the six million figure remained 
unchallenged.

Now to be consistent, Austrian prosecutors would have to charge the 
Vienna Chief Rabbi with Holocaust denial, but such a trial would 
further dent the credibility of the laws protecting the official 
version of events as well as that of the Shoah story itself, 
repeatedly embellished by Hollywood productions. It is, therefore, 
highly unlikely, that the Rabbi will be dragged before a court to 
answer on charges of anti-Semitism.

Meanwhile there are two strands to the unofficial debate about the 
holocaust: on the one hand historians demand that this episode of 
history must not be barred from proper scientific scrutiny in order 
to separate myth from reality. Guiseppe Furioso, for example, asks 
why there is no documentary evidence of the gassings nor any mention 
of it in Churchill's memoirs or by any other political figures of the 
time.

The other, and more potent, strand is the questioning of the Pax 
Americana or victor's justice established with the Nuremberg Trials 
and the propagandistic exploitation of Jewish suffering for imperial 
ends. Just as president Ahmedinejad of Iran convincingly argues that 
if the Germans tried to exterminate the Jews then they should be 
responsible for resettling them in their own country rather than 
making the Palestinians pay the price, others, like the Argentineans, 
point out that powers like Israel who stole Palestinian land and the 
United States of America who stole Native Indian land have no moral 
authority to play world policemen in the name of the International 
Community.

The tide is changing and the Argentinean press release points to the 
fact that its effect is not lost on the pro-Zionist camp: 
"Interestingly", it says, "the Zionist pro-Israeli mainstream media 
implicitly admits that any such investigation poses a grave danger to 
Zionism.

Amidst all the insults and threats from such newspapers like the Los 
Angeles Times, in their 13-Dec-06 issue however, they ran an article 
called Holocaust denial can be dangerous" which concludes by saying 
that, "...attacking the legitimacy of the Holocaust allows... 
(attacking) the legitimacy of Israel, which was created by the United 
Nations as a result of the Holocaust. If the first act didn't happen, 
then the second act wasn't necessary."

In a way this let the cat out of the bag. Israel's days are numbered 
if the last great "religious" taboo of not discussing the true facts 
and dimensions of the holocaust is broken, and with the dollar in 
accelerating decline and US marines taking a beating in Iraq, Iran - 
threatened with a pre-emptive strike by the United States for alleged 
nuclear weapons of mass destruction - seems to have successfully 
managed to cut the Achilles heel of the current Anglo-Zionist world 
order.

Dr. Bleher is a Mathaba Author and has his blog at:

    http://www.flyingimam.com/


-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20061219/b7e437cb/attachment.htm