Faurisson: The UN Decides a Universal Ban on Revisionism

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

Robert FAURISSON 
17 November 2005


The UN Decides a Universal Ban on Revisionism

	On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the 
representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopted - or let 
be adopted - an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th 
"International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the 
Holocaust". Moreover, the resolution "Rejects any denial of the 
Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part". Historical 
revisionism thus sees its existence acknowledged by the whole world, 
a fact proving that it has some life in it, but, at the same time, 
this decision means that the revisionists find themselves struck with 
the reprobation of all the countries of the world. As for the "State" 
of the Vatican, which has no seat at the UN, it had, as early as in 
1992, declared: "There is no historical revisionism that can call 
into question the inhuman abyss of the Holocaust" (« Non c'è 
revisionismo storico che possa rimettere in discussione l'abisso 
disumano dell'Olocausto ») ( L'Osservatore Romano, 7 November1992).

	The history of human societies and religions is rich in 
prohibitions, bannings, excommunications but, whereas, up to a recent 
past, the victims could, at least in principle, hope to find a refuge 
outside of their land or group of origin, here the condemnation is, 
for the first time ever, of universal character. It is thus confirmed 
that historical revisionism is a phenomenon of exceptional nature and 
also that the Jews, yet once more, have been able to obtain 
exorbitant privileges.

A sleight of hand by the Jews

	It was through a sleight of hand that the Israeli delegation 
succeeded in getting this resolution passed. It proceeded in a manner 
like that of certain associations which, in France, under cover of a 
campaign against paedophilia, have obtained a law prohibiting, on the 
Internet, communication relating to paedophilia and Š to revisionism! 
To begin, they asked: "Is paedophilia not a horror in itself?" The 
response was "yes". Their second step was to add: "Is paedophilia on 
the Internet not to be banned by a specific law?" The response, there 
again, was "yes". As a third step the associations concluded: "Let's 
fight, accordingly, to obtain a law against paedophilia and Š 
revisionism [which they called 'negationism']". For his part, the 
President of the General Assembly, the Swede Jan Ellasion, had the 
deftness on November 1st to ask orally whether anyone was opposed to 
the resolution aimed at commemorating the "Holocaust". No hands being 
raised, he declared, without prior recourse to a vote of any kind, 
that the resolution was thereby adopted, the text of which contained 
in one of its provisions the condemnation of any form of "Holocaust" 
revisionism. The draft was approved by the United States in utter 
disregard of the guarantees of freedom of opinion provided by the 
first amendment to its constitution. And, most remarkably, this 
Israeli text was accepted by the Arabo-Moslem countries, including 
Iran. All those present approved, or let pass with soft verbal 
restrictions, a resolution originating from the Jews that goes so far 
as to condemn the right of free research on a historical subject. The 
UN act assumes only a political and not a juridical character. Still, 
since it provides that the Secretary General will have to report on 
the measures subsequently taken within the framework of the 
resolution, the revisionists will have reason to fear consequences 
for themselves of a judicial or administrative nature, for instance, 
as regards border and airport police, authorisation to enter and stay 
in certain countries or the issuing of visas. The resolution will 
serve morally to justify and facilitate extradition measures taken 
against revisionists. Precedents are not lacking, what with 1) the 
European arrest warrant; 2) the virtual handing over of revisionist 
René-Louis Berclaz by Serbia to Switzerland; 3) the handing over of 
revisionist Ernst Zündel by the United States to Canada, then by 
Canada to Germany; 4) the handing over of Belgian revisionist 
Siegfried Verbeke by the Netherlands to Germany; 5) the handing over 
of revisionist Germar Rudolf to Germany by the United States. In 
Austria, on November 11, the semi-revisionist David Irving, a British 
citizen, was arrested by traffic police on a motorway and is now in 
detention in Vienna. For any noted revisionist it is already risky to 
leave the confines of his home country. In doing so, he exposes 
himself to a request for extradition made to the country of transit 
by either Israel or Germany. There is at present a bill in committee 
at the Knesset that will authorise Israel to demand the handing over 
of any revisionist in order to bring him before a court, sitting in 
Jerusalem, that will apply the 1986 Jewish antirevisionist law 
against him. 

The Jewish State's Offensive

A fortnight ago, Philippe Bolopion, United Nations correspondent for 
Le Monde, wrote a particularly informative article on the successes 
achieved at the UN by the Jewish State since June 2004 ("L'offensive 
de charme d'Israël à l'ONU rencontre un certain succès", Le Monde, 4 
November 2005, p. 3). He listed six recent accomplishments of that 
State: 1) in June 2004, Kofi Annan called for an acknowledgement 
"that the United Nations' record on anti-Semitism has at times fallen 
short of our ideals"; 2) in October of the same year, a resolution 
including a condemnation of antisemitism was adopted; 3) in January 
2005, a special session of the General Assembly marked the 60th 
anniversary of "the liberation of the death camps"; 4) in June, an 
Israeli ambassador was elected vice-president of the General Assembly 
- the first Israeli in fifty-three years; 5) in September, on a visit 
to the UN for a gathering of heads of state and government, Ariel 
Sharon shook hands with Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf, while 
the Israeli delegation made numerous new contacts; 6) in October, the 
Security Council was quick to condemn the Iranian calls, which were 
nothing new, for the Jewish State to be erased from the map.

The Jewish State's incomparable gall

These successes are all the more striking as no nation in the world 
has made fun of the UN like "Israel", a state that, however, owes its 
creation to Š the UN. The Jewish State, with an incomparable gall (in 
Jewish parlance: chutzpah), has thrown a record number of United 
Nations "resolutions" straight into the bin. In violation of 
international law, this State, founded on the colossal lie of the 
"Holocaust", practises colonialism, racism, apartheid, military 
occupation and torture. We may add that it possesses an arsenal of 
atomic weapons and on this score has, for example, in the last few 
years been supplied by Germany, free of charge, in the name of the 
said "Holocaust", with three ultra-modern submarines fitted out for 
nuclear armament. The collusion between, on the one hand, the Jewish 
State and armed forces and, on the other hand, the German State and 
armed forces has become such that the German mail service has just 
released a stamp, for the most regular rate of postage, depicting, on 
the left, the Israeli flag, then, on the right, the German flag and, 
finally, linking the two, a strand of barbed wire, symbol of the 
perpetual "Holocaust". Germany is becoming the Jewish State's 
"Guantanamo".

On October 5, 2003, Israeli ambassador to the UN Dan Gillerman had 
warned the Security Council members that the God of the Jews was 
"watching" them and, on July 16 2004, annoyed at the behaviour of 
some Arab states, flung the remark at his colleagues in the General 
Assembly that things had "reached a point where the inmates are 
running the asylum". On the other hand, on October 31 of this year, 
he said that he was "moved" when presenting the "Holocaust Day" text, 
his country's first successful draft resolution ever. He declared: "I 
feel moved and privileged to present this historic resolution today, 
as an Israeli, a Jew, a human being and a child of a family of 
Holocaust victims". That is understandable. The next day, the 
"adoption" of his resolution marked the triumph of the "Holocaust" 
sham. For the occasion, one may say that as far as gall, dishonest 
procedure, spirit of domination and intolerance are concerned, the 
Jewish State has outdone itself.

	This extraordinary UN resolution also constitutes proof that 
historical revisionism is a reality that can no longer be bypassed, 
denied or played down. Its notoriety has become global. Still, let us 
take care to recognise that the revisionist researchers who remain 
active are now but a handful and, with each passing year, their 
future grows darker.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20051121/380ae553/attachment.htm