ZGram - 12/20/2004 - "Mixed bag of this and that"
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Mon Dec 20 05:13:36 EST 2004
ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny: Now more than ever!
December 20, 2004
Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
Today's ZGram will be a "mixed bag" - part pitch for support, part
inspirational update, part global news, the way I used to do ZGrams
"in the olden days" (ten years ago) when meaningful websites
depicting our struggle for Truth in History were few and far between
and I had to depend on readers sending me comments and news.
Here is a small assortment:
=====
A pointed excerpt from a letter to the Editors of the National Post
in response to yesterday's article - and the claim of "anti-Zundel
Zundel watchers" that Ernst is really only after publicity in order
to embarrass the Canadian legal system:
"The Jews could have left him alone on that hillside in Tennessee
where he certainly was not bothering the Canadian legal system."
=====
Likewise, three brief comments from readers to me:
"Ingrid: I think the National Post writer outsmarted himself!"
"Surely you had not forgotten, that the National Post and many other
news media worldwide, are owned by the notorious ZIONAZIS, the
ASPERS? What else did you expect from such filth - the TRUTH?"
"Some valid points were made in that article, but what a vicious
string of lies, pejoratives, & defamations! The valid facts therein
would have never seen the light of day w/o the Zundel-hating,
immigrant-pandering BS which surrounded them! One thing I know for
sure, if a man is going to come under attack, he could do worse than
to have a fireball like Ingrid in his corner!"
=====
Our thanks to Jeff Rense of www.rense.com. His call for Zundel
postcards has sent us a flood of greetings from all parts of the
world already - and, I must tell you, a small handful of the most
genuine and beautiful cards came from Jews. Ernst's utterly
unnecessary martyrdom in his cold cell is causing discomfort even in
enemy quarters.
My thanks to all who wrote - I only wish that more would have
included their names and addresses so I could have sent them a sample
of our monthly newsletter. It is a sad, sad commentary on our times
that good people are afraid to put their names to a kind gesture!
Ernst sends his regards and wants you to know that his spirit is
unbroken. He has told me repeatedly that he believes a global
political change for the better can and will happen - as he has put
it to me many times: "It could happen very, very fast!"
=====
A long-time friend sent this suggestion in addition for those who
need to save a postage stamp:
"Hi Ingrid, you should write a note in your Zgrams that everyone
around the world can send a Christmas Greeting to Ernst in jail.
Write him an email postcard and tell him that the Zundel struggle is
your struggle. Tell him good people love Ernst Zundel because good
people love the truth - and he stands for the truth.
Tell him he will not be forgotten - that thousands are supporting him
today and millions will tomorrow as this horror story of talmudic
abuse and vengeance gets known across the world!
http://zundelsite.org/zundel_postcard/index.html
=====
Also, a DVD demonstration in front of the Metro West Detention
Center, titled "Free Ernst Zundel"
. The Canadian Association for
Freedom of Expression (CAFE) has put it together
.
=====
Likewise, a DVD demo of our splendid Hollywood Zundel documentary
will be available soon. It does not yet have a title. I like "Rebel
of the Spirit" - do you? I had hoped I would have copies to send to
our supporters well before Christmas. Unfortunately, this won't be
possible because there is a delay in getting the updated hardware and
software I ordered to facilitate duplication and shipping.
However, I have previewed the demo, and it is a convincing and
impressive one. I can't wait to see the product finished. This most
important outreach project would never have happened, had the
Holocaust Lobby not seen fit to kidnap their favorite victim so
"Shylock could get his pound of flesh" yet one more time!
What a disgraceful legacy these vengeful people leave behind even as
their evil deeds are being challenged and exposed all around the
globe! Don't let their shrieking their invectives tell you
otherwise! It is their Last Hurrah to silence you!
=====
To move from the personal to more global, general issues - from the
Tehran Times Political Desk comes this:
[START]
Jewish organizations behind Al Manar ban in France: Faurisson
TEHRAN (MNA) -- The Mehr News Agency recently conducted an interview
with Professor Robert Faurisson, a former lecturer of Lyon
University, about France's decision to ban the Al Manar satellite
television network. Following is the text of the interview:
MNA: France's highest administrative court, the Council of State,
last week moved decisively to ban Al Manar television, alleging that
the network had repeatedly violated the country's anti-hate laws and
ignored its own pledge to avoid making anti-Semitic statements. What
is your view of the decision?
Faurisson: Unfortunately, it is totally normal. In France, Jewish
organizations get whatever they demand. And especially the Conseil
Représentatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF), headed by
former banker Roger Cukierman, who was very instrumental in the
campaign against Al Manar.
MNA: Do you think the Zionist lobby in the U.S. influenced Frances
decision to ban Al Manar?
Faurisson: In France Jewish power is even stronger than in the USA.
In France it is our lobby number 1. Nobody dares to speak out against
those people because of their alleged "Holocaust".
MNA: France claims it is a pioneer in freedom of expression, so how
do you evaluate this claim? Isn't the recent decision against freedom
of expression and human dignity?
Faurisson: Please, don't be naive! In 1789, France said: "Liberté,
égalité, fraternité." Three years afterwards, France began massive
killings of French citizens in the name of "Liberté, égalité,
fraternité". It is an old tradition to say something and to do the
contrary. In the Book of Laws, we have one sentence to say that
freedom of opinion, of press, of research is a principle and then we
have pages and pages for explaining that freedom is so important
that it needs to be protected by dozens of prohibitions, exceptions,
bans, etc.
MNA: Actually, France doesn't respect the rights of its citizens, as
it has banned the hijab (Islamic headscarf) in public schools. How do
you assess that?
Faurisson:
Because Jews, in a certain way, are used to treating the French as
they treat Palestinians. The difference is that Palestinians refuse
to obey the Jews, whereas the French obey the Jews, once more because
of the Big Lie of the alleged "Holocaust", in which unfortunately
they seem to believe.
The alleged "Holocaust" of the Jews is the sword and the shield of
the Jewish tyranny all over the world. Destroy it!
[END]
=====
And, finally, the Washington Post article I promised you yesterday:
[START]
Indefinite Jailing of 6 in Canada Tests Legal System
By Doug Struck
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, December 19, 2004; Page A27
TORONTO -- For a long time, Mona el-Fouli lied to her young children.
Their father was working, she told them at first. He was on a trip,
she said later. But when she took her boys, 5 and 7, to see their
father behind a glass partition, they knew he was in jail.
"Please mom, can I break this glass and go inside to play with my
dad?" pleaded the 7-year-old, she recounted.
For 4 1/2 years, el-Fouli's husband, Mohammed Zeki Mahjoub, has been
imprisoned in Toronto without being charged, without facing trial,
and without being fully told what evidence is being used to keep him
there. The government has said he is a potential terrorist. His wife
and defenders say the authorities should prove it or let him go.
Mahjoub is one of six men being held in Canada as security risks on
secret evidence. In a country that boasts of its tolerance and
respect for legal rights, the jailings present an awkward dilemma for
judges, lawmakers and some members of the public.
"This process causes suffering for families . . . and includes
serious infringements of basic rights," Meili Faille, a member of
Parliament from Quebec, said this month in a speech before lawmakers
attacking the government's use of "security certificates" to hold the
men.
On Dec. 10, a federal appeals court in Ottawa ruled the procedure
constitutional. To allow the men to be released would be "an
abandonment by the community as a whole of its right to survival in
the name of blind absolutism of individual rights," the court
concluded.
In Britain, the highest appeals court ruled Thursday that a similar
law there, under which 11 security suspects have been imprisoned
indefinitely after secret hearings, violated European human rights
laws. The ruling, a blow to the measures adopted in Britain after the
attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, is likely to strengthen opposition to
security incarcerations in Canada, a member of the British
Commonwealth.
The system of security certificates permits the imprisonment of
anyone who is not a Canadian citizen on the signed authorization of
two cabinet ministers. Each case is presented in secret to the
ministers by intelligence or police agencies and then reviewed by a
federal judge; the evidence is not shown to the detained individual.
If the judge approves, the person can be deported.
"Most of the information our security people get about these people
is passed along by foreign sources under the condition that it not be
revealed," James Bissett, a former director of Canada's immigration
services, said in defense of the secrecy. "You have to have pretty
solid evidence."
Mahjoub, 44, is accused by the government of belonging to a radical
splinter group of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad organization, working on
a Sudanese farm run by Osama bin Laden, staying briefly with a
top-ranking member of al Qaeda, and lying about the stay when he
entered Canada in 1995. He was working as a store clerk when he was
arrested in 2000.
Adil Charkaoui, a Moroccan who worked in a pizza shop in Montreal,
has been held on a security certificate since May 2003 for allegedly
training at an al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan. Similar allegations have
been made against Hassan Almrei, 30, a Syrian held since October
2001; Mohamed Harkat, 36, an Algerian held since December 2002; and
Mahmoud Jaballah, 41, of Egypt, who has been held since June 2000 for
allegedly making phone calls to an Egyptian Islamic Jihad group in
London.
A sixth man, Ernst Zundel, is a Holocaust denier facing deportation
for allegedly encouraging violence by white supremacist groups.
The government has asserted that it has been judicious in using
security certificates. Anne McLellan, deputy prime minister for
public safety, has said security certificates have been used 27 times
since 1991.
Opponents objected to the evidence being discussed in secret, rather
than being brought to open court where it can be challenged by the
individual or an attorney representing him. A judge's deportation
order cannot be appealed.
"I'm not suggesting security issues should not attract special
safeguards. But this is a clear-cut human rights violation," said
Sharry Aiken, an immigration law expert at Queen's University in
Kingston, Ontario. In October, she presented the government with a
letter signed by 60 law professors who oppose the use of security
certificates.
"None of the individuals subjected to security certificates are
alleged to have been kingpins. They have been small players who have
been involved, at most, in some kind of fundraising activity or
support role," Aiken said.
Matthew Behrens, coordinator of the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials in
Canada, contended that the authorities should not be trusted to
present fair evidence. The Canadian intelligence service, he said,
"has a long record of dishonesty, of getting the facts wrong, of
withholding information, of substituting feelings for facts.
"It's all guilt by association," he said. "You are literally in a
Kafkaesque situation in which they say, 'We believe you are a threat,
but we won't tell you why you are a threat.' "
The dilemma is compounded because the five Muslim men held on
security certificates argued that they would be killed or tortured if
they were deported to their home countries.
Canada is a signatory of an international convention prohibiting
deportations to a country where the detainee would likely face
torture. Canada's Supreme Court has said deportation would be
permissible in "extraordinary circumstances." For now, the accused
men linger in Canada's jails, with no end to their incarceration in
sight.
"Indefinite incarceration is problematic. But the release of the men
may be more than problematic. It may be terrifying," said Martin
Rudner, head of the Canadian Center of Intelligence and Security
Studies at Carleton University in Ottawa.
In the United States, there are no legal provisions for indefinite
incarcerations and secret trials, said Jeffrey Fogel of the Center
for Constitutional Rights in New York. However, two American citizens
have been designated "enemy combatants" and are being held in
military prisons.
The Patriot Act allows the U.S. attorney general to hold illegal
immigrants without charges, but only for seven days, Fogel said.
Because of those restrictions, the Bush administration opted to
transfer prisoners taken in Afghanistan to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
About 550 are still being held there, largely without legal
safeguards.
Fogel said the secret proceedings and indefinite confinement in
Canada "start to rise to the level at which the world has criticized
us over Guantanamo."
"You can't use the ordinary machinery of law," responded Bissett, the
former immigration director. "To wait for an offense to be committed
and then use due process of law is fine for dealing with criminals.
It's not fine for terrorists. You can't wait for them to blow up
several thousand people and then charge them."
[END]
More information about the Zgrams
mailing list