ZGram - 9/17/2004 - "A Report from Abu Ghraib North"
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Fri Sep 17 06:34:35 EDT 2004
ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny: Now more than ever!
September 17, 2004
Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
The Zundel hearings are still in progress. Another day - today - has
been added.
John Farrell, the one-time petty thief turned CSIS operative turned
CSIS snitch turned Catholic school teacher, is on the stand. Ernst
told me last night that he had never, in all his experiences in
dozens of courts on several continents, seen such a difficult
cross-examination. The Zundel defense team is brilliant, not giving
an inch. The government is running massive, furious interference,
aided by Judge Blais who clearly has his marching orders from his
handlers. Get this: In the middle of this court day, Judge Blais
heard secret evidence - probably a first!
Blais, one-time CSIS boss, hates Farrell, and it shows. Of course -
why wouldn't he? Farrell let the cat out of the bag about the
criminal activities of CSIS. At the same time, Judge Blais must
protect his former turf by having no choice but to protect Farrell -
when he'd much rather wring his neck, we guess.
What a disgusting spectacle!
I am waiting for Paul Fromm to send me a detailed report for my
readers - and my records.
Meanwhile, "Setting the Record Straight: Letters from Cell #7" is
big conversation fodder for the guards at the Toronto West Detention
Center, where Ernst and other so-called "security certificate"
prisoners are being held in inhuman conditions. Many guards are
openly rooting for for the book, hoping it will be a bestseller.
Actually, according to Canadian booksellers criteria, it already has
become a bestselling title - more than 5,000 copies have been sold,
largely on word of mouth alone. Orders are still streaming in.
One of the Arabs, last name Almrei, in the cell next to Ernst, has
received his own copy, courtesy of a not-so-mysterious donor who paid
for it and shipped it, since only paperbacks with an invoice marked
"Paid" are allowed. He loves it. He and Ernst have struck up quite
a friendship on the rare occasions they can share a few words.
Other than Almrei, the Arabs stay away from the Zundel case, which is
a pity. We share the same enemies and could share names,
experiences, and pertinent data. I wrote to Maher Arar's wife - Arar
is the rendition victim who was kidnapped in America while traveling
and shipped to be tortured in Syria. The Arar case has the same CSIS
footprint as Ernst's. Arar's wife seems to be a sharp, courageous
lady, who fought hard to get her husband back. I sent her a copy of
Ernst's book and offered cooperation. There was no response - and
only last night I found out that at the very least, the Canadian arm
of their multi-million dollar lawsuit for damages is in some
Jewish-led law firm's hands. Good luck! That explains the
reluctance. That's analogous to making Henry Kissinger the head of
the 9/11 inquiry!
Since we are speaking of Abu Ghraib North, here is a write-up about
another CSIS victim, Mahjoub, also held in that hell-hole, also being
verbally abused by state prosecutor MacIntosh whose specialty is
heaping smears on the people he is to convict. This Arab victim was
slated to be farmed out for torture - but apparently "saved" at the
last minute, at least for now.
[START]
Mahjoub Spared Torture in Egypt for Now:
Temporary Stay Granted in Deportation of Egyptian Refugee Held Four
Years Without Charge at Toronto's Metro West Detention Centre
TORONTO, SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 -- A chartered jet was scheduled to fly
Mohammad Mahjoub out of Canada this afternoon and return him to Egypt
and a future of prison, torture, and cruel and unusual punishment.,
But that flight was cancelled shortly after 1 pm when a stay was
granted, temporarily preventing this illegal deportation.
A group of relieved supporters, including Mahjoub's wife Mona
El-Fouli and members of the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials in Canada,
noted that although Mahjoub is "safe" for now, he returns this
evening to his solitary confinement cell at Metro West Detention
Centre to continue an indefinite period of incarceration which has
been marked by endless humiliation and abuse.
That ill-treatment was the focus of yesterday's hearing, part of a
constitutional challenge to his lengthy detention. Today's positive
decision on deportation was a bit of an ironic trade-off that spared
Mahjoub the torture of Egypt for the torture of Canada, where being
held over 4 years without being shown a shred of evidence why is
torture enough. Add to that an attempted sexual assault upon Mahjoub,
numerous death threats from guards, lack of access to medical care to
deal with high blood pressure and hepatitis C, rampant racism and
anti-Muslim slurs, and one begins to see that Mahjoub has few choices
available to him as his case slowly makes its way through the courts.
Today's hearing began with a brief bit of testimony from Deirdre
Gilker, the Operations Manager for Removals at the Greater Toronto
Enforcement Centre (GTEC), a deportation factory that splits apart
families on a regular basis to meet its deportation quotas. Gilker
stated quietly that GTEC is prepared to remove Mahjoub from Canada,
that a valid travel document is available, and that the deportation
is imminent.
She would not say when and where Mahjoub would depart from, as this
was a "security" concern. She also neglected to mention that her
boss, the immigration department, had concluded in a risk assessment
that Mahjoub would likely face torture upon his return to Egypt. No,
her job is cut and dried: receive a piece of paper with Mahjoub's
name on it, ensure he is "removal ready" (much like a slab of rotten
meat being prepared for the dumpster), and then dispense with him. No
consequences, no moral afterthought, just another day on an assembly
line of misery.
Mahjoub's attorney Barb Jackman asks Gilker if he will be sent out on
a commercial airliner. Gilker says she cannot comment for security
reasons. Jackman counters that "we all know it won't be a commercial
airline -- they won't take these cases," and wonders why Gilker finds
it so difficult to deny this.
Immigration Dept. lawyer Donald MacIntosh jumps up in the first of
numerous over-the-top outbursts today with the point that Mahjoub is
a dangerous guy, as testified to over a year ago when some 60-70 SWAT
team members from Metro Police and the RCMP walked the hallways of
the court with sub-machineguns during a bail hearing. (Of course, no
such security is on hand today, but this escapes Mr. MacIntosh, who
seems to forget such displays, though, rare, are only required once
to leave a certain impression in the public's and the judge's mind.)
His objection is sustained by Judge Eleanor Dawson, and the arguments
for a stay begin. Jackman points out that both sides agree Mahjoub is
at risk if returned to Egypt, and that the assurance he will not be
harmed comes from a general in the Egyptian security force GIS,
implicated in many human rights abuses. "What they have is an
assurance from a torturer that he won't torture," Jackman notes.
She says that since numerous important issues raised by the Mahjoub
file are still before the courts, removing him now would rob him of
the potential justice that he seeks by having these issues dealt
with. Indeed, if he were returned to Egypt, it is unlikely a
government known for major human rights violations would allow him to
return to Canada for future court dates which, if victorious, would
result in Mahjoub being allowed to stay in Canada.
Jackman also quotes from expert testimony and an Amnesty
International document which clearly show the grave risk to Mahjoub
if returned.
MacIntosh rises and, with little reference to relevant case law,
instead goes on what is becoming increasingly common in these
proceedings: a raving rant that makes him sound like George W. Bush
on mega-doses of steroids. MacIntosh claims "separation of families
[by deportation] does not lead to irreparable harm" and cautions the
judge against allowing the best interests of the children to trump
other considerations. He then repeatedly attacks Mahjoub, calling him
a liar, perjurer, a sneaky, devious, dangerous man who seems to have
tricked the "well-intentioned" Amnesty International and who, by
calling himself a devout Muslim, insults the majority of the world's
Muslims.
After all, he points out, Mahjoub is [allegedly] tied to groups that
are "seeking weapons of mass destruction." Oh oh, he's used the WMD
word. Last time we heard that, WMD were being denied as an issue even
by the Bush administration, whose own intelligence failures on the
issue are well-known. Like a similar outburst at the hearing of
Mahmoud Jaballah a few weeks back, this is an embarrassing torrent of
empty rhetoric which, as Barb Jackman points out, seems to be issued
more for the benefit of the press than for the benefit of the court.
Jackman points out that there has never been any conclusive evidence
that Mahjoub is any of these things, for the test in a security
certificate is "the lowest standard of proof in the courts. The test
is whether the facts are POSSIBLY true, not even PROBABLY true."
"The best experts on intelligence went to war and thousands of lives
have been lost in Iraq on evidence that wasn't true," she reminds the
court.
Jackman points out there are numerous alternative courses for the
government to follow, including releasing Mahjoub on strict bail
conditions. Better yet, "if he's such a terrorist, charge him under
the anti-terrorism legislation and show him the evidence. But they
haven't done that because they [the government] don't have a case to
prove."
After a half hour break, Justice Dawson returns with her decision.
There are, she says, three issues that need to be addressed in the
application: is this a serious issue, would irreparable harm result
from Mahjoub being deported, and whether the balance of convenience
shows he would suffer greater harm in being deported than the
inconvenience to the minister of Immigration in granting the stay.
Dawson says she is satisfied on all three counts, quoting liberally
from the Amnesty International and expert human rights opinions which
have been offered. She says a denial of the stay would make his
upcoming judicial review of the deportation decision "nugatory," so
irreparable harm has been established.
"If it appears he will not stay in detention," she says, then he must
be brought before the court on an urgent basis to review the stay
decision.
It was the conclusion of an emotional two days that began Tuesday
morning, with the continuation of Mahjoub's testimony about prison
conditions. After having argued for a partially closed hearing for
his own protection, he decided instead that he would speak out about
those conditions, despite considerable risk to him at the prison.
"Mr. Mahjoub fully understands the risks he is taking. It would be
his preference not to face those risks," his attorney John Norris
begins, but Mahjoub is concerned that the truth get out.
He then goes on to detail some of the horrible incidents which have
occurred at the jail. On March 7, 2001, upon returning from court, he
was strip searched, during which he politely asked to keep his boxer
shorts on, as Muslim men are not allowed to appear naked in front of
anyone else.
"The guard exploded with anger, calling me names, being abusive
toward me and my family, and Muslims in general," Mahjoub explains.
"'You are supposed to be killed, not just you but all Muslims,'"
Mahjoub quotes the guard as saying to him.
Mahjoub tried to describe to the guard what it was to be a Muslim,
about not drinking or taking drugs.
"'I don't give a fuck about your fucking religion, this is not your
fucking country,'" Mahjoub recalls the guard screaming at him.
Mahjoub said he would charge the guard, after which the guard told
him, "People like you should be killed. All Muslims should be
burned." Mahjoub then says the guard pointed to a fellow inmate in
the area and asked the inmate, "How can you live with this fucking
piece of shit [Mahjoub]? I'm surprised you didn't do anything to him."
Mahjoub made a complaint about this and numerous other such incidents
to the jail authorities, to the Ontario Ombudsman, and various human
rights bodies, but little or no action appeared to have taken place
in response.
Mahjoub freely gave names and badge numbers of officers involved in
these incidents, again a very courageous move considering the
possible retribution he might face back at the jail.
After September 11, 2001, Mahjoub said, "My life was turned into
something like hell. My family also suffered."
On September 14, 2001, one of the female officers told him to collect
his things and led him to solitary confinement, without telling him
what was going on. When he kept inquiring, she became very angry with
him, yelling out that he would be deported to the United States. He
asked to contact his wife and lawyer, but that was refused.
After he eventually met with then security chief Nelson Cardoza, who
reassured him that he would not be deported to the U.S., the guard
was confronted with this information, and denied everything.
In segregation, he was given a "security gown," a sleeveless, loose
T-shirt which doesn't cover the body properly and certainly provides
no warmth. He learned that such gowns were given to people on suicide
watch.
"I was confused, I was not a violent man or attempted suicide. If
they think these things will prevent a suicide they are mistaken.
These things are meant to destroy the person."
He was kept between 21 and 24 days in solitary, five days of them in
a cell with no lighting and a toilet that flushed only once a day.
He was taken back to general population but then again transferred to
segregation in December, where he froze, asking for blankets which
never came. Each time he asked why, "I was told 'because you are a
prisoner. When you go home you can turn the heat up.'"
Mahjoub says "it was ridiculous, like a comedy," at which he breaks
down, requiring time to collect himself. He recalls having no towel
to wash and prepare for prayers (for Muslims, being clean before
prayer is a key part of religious practice), no soap, no toothpaste,
and he had to use his drinking glass to wash his body as well.
He recalls one particularly horrifying incident when, after being up
all night consumed with worry, he finally fell asleep around 5 am,
shortly after which a guard started banging on his door, screaming
obscenities about him and his family, "threatening to kill me, to
slaughter me. He even made the sign of his finger around his neck" to
show what was in store for Mahjoub.
"The sound felt like an earthquake. I jumped out of bed, I was so
frightened, I froze, unable to say anything."
"You are a fucking Muslim terrorist," the guard told him. "I will
kill you, you are a motherfucker goof." Mahjoub names the guard and
says he still works at the institution.
When Mahjoub made a complaint to another guard, he was told, "You
must be dreaming."
As Mahjoub goes through this, I am reminded of what a palliative care
nurse once said about her patients. "Look at the brow, look at the
forehead, see if there's wrinkles there, and if there are, that's
pain."
As Mahjoub gives his testimony, you can see the pain in his forehead.
His eyes dart about as if he is seeking a safe place to curl up and
make the painful memories go away. His brow is deeply furrowed at
times, and he notes there is one incident so severe that he refuses
to discuss it; thelast time he talked about it in court he went
through a month of emotional and psychological trauma. "I felt like a
person who had lost his mind, gone crazy."
He details being sent back and forth to segregation without
explanation. Although locked away for anywhere from 23 and a half to
24 full hours each day, he says he was strip searched about 3/4 of
the time while held there.
He says one night, December 14, 2003, he was playing chess in his
cell with two other prisoners when he collapsed on the floor in pain,
experiencing double vision, dizziness, sweating, headache. The others
begged guards to get him medical attention. The guards refused to
allow a nurse to enter the cell and check his blood pressure, and
demanded Mahjoub get up and walk out. He was in such pain that he
could not move, so they ended up hauling him out of the cell and
dragging him some 100 metres not to the health unit but to solitary
confinement. The nurse asked guards to call 911 to take Mahjoub to
the hospital, but they ignored this request. "You either walk with us
or we'll drag you," the guards said, refusing his request for a
wheelchair.
"My head was banging against the guards' feet. One of the guards said
this is not the way to treat an inmate." While the guards joked that
Mahjoub was in fact just upset at the capture of Saddam Hussein
earlier that day, he wound up on the floor of his solitary cell,
screaming in pain and receiving no treatment. He was given no
mattress or blanket, and instead thrown a security gown that remained
on the floor overnight.
One week later, tests confirmed he had Hepatitis C.
During cross examination, government lawyer Daniel Roussy attacks
Mahjoub mercilessly. After Mahjoub reveals he was on a 39-day hunger
strike, Roussy condemns him because it appears he has put some weight
on since coming off the long-term denial of food.
"Would you not agree you have had good medical help?" Roussy asks
him, counting the visits of a number of health professionals.
"No," Mahjoub responds, pulling out a photo of a prisoner being
dragged at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison and stating, "This is how I
was dragged! How can you call this good medical treatment?"
Roussy insists a prison report says that the night Mahjoub was
dragged to solitary he was "verbally abusive" and "refused" to get up.
Mahjoub responds that he did not refuse to get up, he simply could
not rise. As for being verbally abusive, there is no report of
disciplinary action or infractions, usually a result of verbal abuse
towards guards. It appears, Mahjoub says, that someone has lied in
the making of that report.
As he goes through the reports, those of us who have been working on
the campaign begin to see an interesting pattern emerge, one that
shows that public pressure works. On two separate dates, Mahjoub says
he was moved, without explanation, out of solitary confinement and
back to thegeneral population. Both dates correspond with
demonstrations held by the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials outside the
detention centre.
Mahjoub will likely not receive a decision on his detention release
application until the end of the year, and a date has yet to be set
for judicial review of his deportation decision. In the meantime, he
is relieved about the stay, and bemused that so much hot air was
expended on him by government lawyers today. He wishes to thank those
who have come to court, supported his family, and sent him cards and
letters, and hopes people in Canada will continue writing to Anne
Mclellan to stop the deportation and end his long-term incarceration.
On a related note, charges against four people who were arrested at
CSIS national headquarters last October 31 while trick-or-treating
for secret evidence will be dismissed Friday morning in Ottawa. After
almost a year of requesting proper disclosure from the demonstration
-- everything from RCMP security reports and video surveillance to
CSIS plans for the demonstration and a subpoena for Ward Elcock,
former head of CSIS -- the Crown has said they have no evidence
against us (yah, right) and so charges will be dismissed. Guess CSIS
did not any more bad press...
Members of the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials will be joined by
Christian Peacemaker Teams, Tikkun, and the Canadian Assdociation of
Jews and Muslims this Sunday, Sept. 12 at 1:30 pm in Toronto at CSIS
HQ, 277 Front Street West, for a multifaith march
through downtown Tornto. The event is preceded the evening before
with a CPT benefit at 9 pm at the Reverb (Bathurst and Queen).
(Source: http://www.homesnotbombs.ca/mahjoubgetsstay.htm)
More information about the Zgrams
mailing list