Zgram - 8/26/2004 - "Bullies in the school yard"
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Tue Aug 24 09:12:46 EDT 2004
>
>
>Zgram - Where Truth is Destiny: Now more than ever!
>
>August 26, 2004
>
>Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
>
>I was really glad the Internet revealed a veritable shower of
>so-called "antisemitic incidents" that were revealed as hoaxes.
>These hoaxes are amazingly, repetitively naughty - they almost
>always have to do with swastika graffiti and toppling of Jewish
>gravestones.
>
>Such vandalism acts, committed in the night, are uniquely un-Western
>- dare I say un-Aryan - acts. Those aren't things we do. For the
>most part, our folks are neat. They are tradition-minded. We have
>a reverence for places set aside to honor and remember our dead -
>and other people's dead. Our sense of right and wrong simply
>revolts at such unsavory, juvenile conduct. Furthermore, our
>people have a visceral aversion for things done in the dark of the
>night, on the sly. It's better to call people on the carpet. It's
>just not our style to smear and to destroy - and, thankfully, ever
>more people realize that shrieking "Antisemitism!" at every
>opportunity as a response to ethnically uncharacteristic vandalism
>is a deliberate, unsavory political act - like letting fly of a
>spitball!
>What's your reaction to a spitball? If you're like most folks, most
>of the time you duck! You don't punch the aggressive spitball
>artist in the nose - at least I don't. Not yet. Known to strive
>ever to be ladylike, I hope I won't - not ever! Some people might,
>however. Perhaps in days to come, a lot of people will if spitball
>showers do not stop. I plead that they will stop!
>Nowhere, however, is it written that one should act as if it's
>perfectly okay to overlook a spitball. At least say something!
>Express your disgust! Say, "Wait a minute! I don't like this -
>and you won't either if you keep this up! I don't like slurs like
>that!" Remember how Ronald Reagan told Nancy when a bullet came
>flying his way: "Honey, I forgot to duck!"? Next time, an
>undeserved, uncalled-for psycho-terror spitball heads your way to
>silence you, to make you cringe and hide, say calmly but firmly:
>"No, buster! I won't duck!"
>
>The article below is full of RKPS [Requisite Kneefall Paragraph
>Symptom] phrases and paragraphs. Let that not bother you. This
>writer is getting annoyed at the spitballs - and he is talking back:
>
>[START]
>
>John Roughan: Cemetery wreckers hurt us, not Israel
>
>14.08.2004
>
>Whoever went out to the Makara Cemetery one night to push over as
>many Jewish gravestones as they could, scrawl swastikas about and
>set fire to a prayer pavilion, has made a telling impact on two
>important public debates in this country. I am almost afraid now to
>argue for the freedom of a Holocaust sceptic to visit here or even
>to criticise Israel as strongly as it deserves.
>
>I am not alone. The Government, which had withstood the New Zealand
>Jewish Council's first attempt to blame its handling of the passport
>incident for a cemetery assault, this time put a resolution to
>Parliament condemning anti-Semitism as though it was rampant here.
>
>"Let it be hoped the recent vandalism is the work of an isolated
>crank or cranks," began Acting Prime Minister Michael Cullen, before
>concluding it was "something evil and irrational though sadly
>deep-seated in European culture."
>
>Every party agreed. National's Gerry Brownlee deplored "these
>idiotic acts of hate". Peter Dunne felt "the true horror of events
>has been that those features we have criticised in other countries
>are now occurring in our own". Rodney Hide said: "We must all now
>realise that anti-Semitism is a reality in New Zealand." For Speaker
>Jonathan Hunt the vandalism was one of the most shocking incidents
>he had seen in a 37-year career.
>
>The resolution was to be sent to Israel's Parliament and the
>president of the Jewish Council, David Zwartz, welcomed it as "a
>statement of diplomatic reconciliation between the Parliament of New
>Zealand and the State of Israel".
>
>Pardon? Forgive me, what did any of this have to do with Israel? A
>despicable injury was done to the families of those whose headstones
>were desecrated, to all Jewish citizens of New Zealand and to the
>rest of us. What has it to do with Israel?
>
>Whoever did it owes us an apology for creating an impression around
>the world that we have an issue here. We simply don't. You grow up
>in New Zealand neither knowing nor caring whether companions are of
>Jewish descent. And if they happen to mention their heritage, they
>probably find others interested but no more so than if they were
>Dutch or Catholic. My Catholic roots define me in some eyes more
>than I think they should, and occasionally I sense a prejudice but
>it is not worth mentioning.
>
>I really wonder about anti-Semitism. All sorts of prejudices were
>permeating societies such as ours 50 or so years ago and they are
>not now. Anti-Semitism died the day the victors of World War II
>opened the Nazi death camps. The Holocaust was not the only genocide
>of its scale in recent times but for Europeans it was the closest to
>home and still haunts the Western conscience.
>
>IT was the event that clinched the creation of Israel and to this
>day descendants of those who died or survived the camps invoke the
>Holocaust whenever Israel is criticised. They ensure that sceptical
>views of the Holocaust are perilous and now we know it is the one
>subject on which a person can be barred from this country simply for
>what he might say.
>
>Anti-Semitism was a pathology, I think, of Europe before the global
>migrations of the last century. When Europeans lived in homogenous
>communities, Jews and Gypsies were probably the only distinct
>minorities they knew. With the washback from global colonialism
>those groups would have paled in comparison to new arrivals.
>
>To find anti-Semitism in western societies today you need to go to
>the demented fringe of xenophobic politics or treat seriously the
>mindless paraphernalia of yobs and militaria collectors.
>
>Many of the statements that groups such as the Jewish Council
>nowadays regard as anti-Semitic are in fact anti-Israel - there is a
>difference - and most of those that cross the line come from Arab or
>other Middle Eastern sources which, really, can be forgiven.
>
>Jews, to them, are invaders who constantly insult their territorial
>and cultural integrity. And I am not talking just about the
>foundation of Israel and its subsequent seizures of the rest of
>Palestine. Invasion and seizure of their homes and property is still
>a common experience for Palestinians in the West Bank.
>
>We don't hear much about this; I had long imagined that the Jewish
>settlements in the occupied territories, reprehensible as they are,
>had been colonies of largely vacant land between Palestinian towns
>and villages. Seems not.
>
>Last Monday you might have read an interview in the Herald with a
>dissenting Jew, Jeff Halper, American-born professor of anthropology
>at Ben-Gurion University. His organisation, the Israeli Committee
>Against House Demolitions, does what it can to stop the steady,
>strategic clearance of Palestinian homes and villages.
>
>Sometimes they stand in the way of Israeli bulldozers, sometimes
>help Palestinians to rebuild and reclaim their homes, and do what
>they can to contest land expropriation, the expansion of
>settlements, construction of by-pass roads, the wholesale uprooting
>of fruit and olive trees and so on.
>
>Professor Halper's group sees a dark logic behind the walls and the
>roads Israel is building through the occupied territories. Israel,
>it reckons, knows it will have to allow a Palestinian state to be
>established in some form and it is moving now to ensure any such
>"state" is weak, divided and dependent on Israel.
>
>The way the West Bank is now taking shape, they say, there will be
>three Palestinian bantustans divided by Israeli settlements and
>roads. Gaza, which the Sharon Government is ready to transfer, now
>consists of three separate cantons, between which Palestinians
>cannot travel. The highways are for Israelis only.
>
>As the nature of the "two-state solution" becomes clear, Israel and
>its apologists will continue to need the anachronism of
>anti-Semitism to silence critics and manipulate public opinion.
>
>What, therefore, has our embarrassment at Makara got to do with
>Israel? Probably everything.
>
>(Source:
>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3584190&thesection=news&thesubsection=dialogue)
>
>[END]
More information about the Zgrams
mailing list