ZGram - 6/6/2004 - "Holocaust 101 - Part IV"

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

Zgram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

June 6, 2004

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

Continuing with the "Holocaust 101" series.

[START]

4. The Revisionist claim: Official state policy towards the Jews in 
the Third Reich was emigration, not extermination.

It is true that Hitler Germany wanted to remove the Jews from the 
German people's "sphere of influence." The country was at war - a war 
largely seen as having been instigated by international banking 
Jewry, and Jews were seen as a corroding influence, not only 
financially but also racially and culturally.

A common word then used was "parasites." (Know that, in America, a 
National Socialist is commonly referred to as "scum bag" - or worse . 
. .)

Hitler Germany was adamant in not wanting Jews to be part of Germany 
because they were held to be harmful to the fabric of an ethnically 
cohesive society as it was woven by Hitler. The Führer wanted Jews 
"out of his face." He was not fond of them.

But that is where the story stops. The Talmudic twists and gyrations 
some of these people still go through, when "relocation" and 
"evacuation" of Jews suddenly become code words for "extermination", 
is amazing.

All of it was covered in the Zündel Trials in the minutest detail and 
has been laid to rest forever in the transcripts of those trials, now 
permanent documents in the Canadian judicial law libraries! ( 
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrdtoc.html )

The Himmler Posen speech, to be even more specific, was the subject 
of lengthy analysis in the two Toronto Zündel trials. Minute detail 
can be gleaned in studying the testimony of German political 
scientist Udo Walendy and Dr. Robert Faurisson in the 1985 trial and 
in the testimony of Browning, Faurisson British historian David 
Irving and Mark Weber in the second, 1988, trial. (Again, the 
reference here is the Kulaszka book, Did Six Million Really Die?)

Time and again, the Holocaust Promotion Lobby counts on the naiveté: 
of the reader who is not likely to check on the facts and fine-tune 
his thinking.


[END]