ZGram - 2/2/2004 - "Update on the Zundel Struggle"

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

Zgram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

February 2, 2004

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

Some of the Zgram below is "legalese", but I wanted it preserved for 
the record.  Up-front, look at the Zundelsite stats:

In less than two months (from December 8th to today), the Zundelsite 
count is as follows:

Total Hits:    984,269
Average Hits Per Day  17,267 
Average Hits Per Hour  738 
Average Hits Per Visitor  8.3 

In other words, we are very close to having achieved the "6 million 
hits" we were aiming for some time ago. 

Very popular still are the Harwood booklet pages, "Did Six Million 
Really Die?" and the Leuchter Report!

And, by the way, speaking of the Leuchter Report:  The documentary 
that was based on that report by Fred Leuchter, titled "Mr. Death" 
was playing on Swedish television a few days ago, to great interest 
and many comments on how forceful and believable Mr. Zundel came 
across!

So you can see that interest in Holocaust Revisionism is alive and 
well, despite all the gloomy predictions!  If the Zundelsite is doing 
that well, despite the fact that I have had very little time for 
close to four years to update the website other than to keep the 
trial information current and my Zgrams going, imagine what the other 
revisionist websites such as www.vho.org and www.ihr.org are doing! 
At the present time, they are much more current than the Zundelsite. 

=====

Paul Fromm reports on the session of the Canadian Federal Court of 
Appeal that took place on  January 28, 2004:

Justices: Messrs. Sexton, Struger, Evans;

For the Government: Mr. MacIntosh, (Lead), plus three other persons in
lawyerly robes;

For the Apellant: Mr. Peter Lindsay and his partner, Chi-Kun Shi;

Audience: About a dozen people for each side, no representatives of the Press;

Mr. MacIntosh spoke for about half an hour on his motion to quash the
appeal on the question whether the issuance of a National Security
Certificate under the Immigration Law is reasonable or not.   He interpreted
requirements for the judicial review of the reasonableness of the
Certificate and felt that this appeal does not meet those requirements.

Lengthy interpretations of Sect. 74, 80.3 81 of the Federal Immigration Act
followed to support this contention.  He stated that the Right of an Appeal
does not exist.  If it were allowed,  a "whole raft" of other appeals would be
launched as several issues, such as the secrecy of the evidence and the
witnesses etc. would be appealed.

He felt that the Canadian Parliament fully intended the restrictions of the
right of appeal, quoting the example of  the law that a removal order
cannot be appealed.

He recommended that Mr. Zundel's detention be continued.

Mr. Lindsay in his rebuttal stated that the Law does not explicitly state
that an appeal is not allowed; only the determination cannot be appealed.
Therefore, this Court should not take away, what the Parliament has not
taken away.

His interpretation of Section 76 and 77 followed, and he
discussed the applicability of the principles of Natural Law and Fairness
to this case, which should be taken into consideration by the judges.

He also pointed out that this is not a judicial review of Justice Blais'
work before whom another session is scheduled for Feb. 9, 2004.

Mr. MacIntosh felt that the appeal was abusing the legal system, to which
Mr. Lindsay objected.

Mr. Lindsay pointed out that a motion to expedite these proceeding had
been made by him on January 22, 2004. He also made a motion for a stay of
the proceedings as several other hearings and appeals are in progress; as
for instance the appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeals under the Charter
of Human Rights.

Unless a stay is issued, contradictory or unworkable
decisions may result. Particularly,  Zundel's constitutional  challenge of
the issuance of the Security Certificate has not yet been dealt with, which
is scheduled for April 14, 2004.

Therefore, a delayed decision in Mr. Zundel's favour would be useless to
him, as he could be sitting in a German jail by then.

The Judges reserved their judgement on the motions made and gave the
Government and the appellants till Feb. 13, 2004 to make written
submissions. They will then inform the lawyers of their decision; i.e.
there will not be another public session of this Court.

The above information is gathered under very annoying circumstances, as the
audience found it very hard to sometimes impossible, to hear the arguments
made. It could not be determined whether there was a sound system. One
member of the audience was told very quickly by the Court Clerk to "sit
down" , when he raised this issue.

What does this all mean?  Ernst told me that evening:  ***"The abuses 
of the system are on trial.  The way the system works now, the 
government is shooting fish in a barrel.  The judges are fully alert 
to that fact!  "***

=====

Finally, a rather telling press release was issued by CAFE:

[START]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

	CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION WEBSITE UNDER MASSIVE ATTACK

	The Canadian Association for Free Expression website is currently under
a massive attack by hackers.

	"We are currently fighting a massive and obviosuly 
well-organized distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)  which is causing 
the site to be unavailable for periods of time," says CAFE webmaster 
Marc Lemire.

	"The attack started Friday and continues today (Sunday Feb 1, 
2004) using a SYN Flood technique to overwhelm the webserver," he 
explains.

	Why this criminal attack in cyberspace?

"With CAFE being the number one voice for honest reporting of the 
bogus  Zundel 'security threat' hearing, is it too crazy to ask if 
the Canadian  Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) or other 
government agents are behind the attack?" asks Paul Fromm, Director 
of the Canadian Association for Free Expression.

	According to Andrew Mitrovica's book COVERT ENTRY, CSIS has 
been, at the
very least, a passive accomplice to a 1995 mailbomb assassination attempt
aimed at Mr. Zundel. CSIS strictly instructed its mail snooping operatives
not to open any package from Vancouver addressed to Mr. Zundel in May,
1995. That very month a powerful pipe bomb with a Vancouver return address
was delivered by mail to Mr. Zundel's Toronto residence.

	This charge against CSIS was raised in federal court Tuesday 
and reported on this website Wednesday, says Paul Fromm. "Is this 
"payback" for our questioning the activities of CSIS, Canada's 
political police, who have strayed far from their mandate which 
exempts peaceful dissent and protest from their scrutiny?" Fromm asks.

	CAFE will not be silenced by electronic terrorists and we 
will continue to  lobby for justice and a fair trial for political 
dissidents like Ernst Zundel and Brad Love.

	"CAFE's website will soon be out in a new and expanded form," 
Fromm announced today.

-- NO SURRENDER --

[END]