ZGram - 12/18/2003 -"Why was Ernst Zundel kidnapped?"

zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Thu Dec 18 22:46:27 EST 2003





December 18, 2003

Word has just come that Judge Blais, a one-time CSIS boss, refuses to
recuse himself, insisting that during his tenure, he had no knowledge of
the Zundel Case.  Why, then, is Ernst described as so "dangerous" for
Canada, meriting the label "terrorist"? 

So many people ask, often in utter disbelief: Why on earth would
Ernst's enemies make such a monumental error, kidnapping him on the
flimsiest pretext and locking him up as though he were the worst of
criminals, when they KNOW they have no evidence against him
whatsoever?

Indeed.

There are many answers to that question, at this point all of them
just theory, but bit by bit becoming solid evidence. I have my own
theory, not shared by everyone. I think it was part chutzpah, part
stupidity, part bluff. Haven't our enemies "boomeranged" themselves
before because they acted hastily and on mere impulse?

My theory is that they thought that they could get away with it. For
one, the INS was merging into a huge bureaucracy, Homeland Security,
and there was a lot of confusion. Furthermore, whoever had his dirty
fingers in this pie counted on a speedy deportation - and not to
Canada; to Germany! Thirdly, these people acted on false data.
They thought that Ernst had left Canada for the US in March 2000 for
the last time - not so! And, finally, they left some nifty traces
they didn't think we would find out. We are still connecting the
dots.

Here is a brief but poignant reader summary of just how stupidly,
with utter disregard for law or even common sense, this kidnapping
was carried out - and now our enemies are stuck with it because what
they did, and how it was done, makes ever more people perk up about
what's really going on. This summary is very useful for our files:

[START]

This is so hard to accept as reality! How can a national government
be so insecure as to indulge itself in the actual persecution of a
pacifist for ! the crime of - what? What is the crime? Racism? I
thought the Jews weren't a race.

Who will benefit if Ernst Zundel is deported to Germany? That is, is
this really a German operation, or a Canadian operation, or an
American operation? Which country is making this persecution happen?
Does Germany really want Ernst Zundel showing up there at this
fragile time of explosive Holocaust awareness?

Or is the alleged crime the blowing of an immigration meeting in a
foreign country? Because a non-Canadian allegedly misses a meeting
regarding his attempt at citizenship in America he is jerked back to
Canada so that he can be deported to Germany, where he can be
punished for defaming the dead? In America, of course, "defamation
of the dead" carries no civil or criminal penalty. There is no such
crime or charge here. Perhaps Canada is different.

But now the charge by the Crown is "terrorism." Since there is no
evidence that he has actually terrorized anyone, the question must be
asked, "Who is terrified of Ernst Zundel?"

Black's Law Dictionary defines "terror" as "Alarm; fright; dread;
the state of mind induced by the apprehension of hurt from some
hostile or threatening event or manifestation; fear caused by the
appearance of danger." Black's says that "A person is guilty of a
felony if he threatens to commit any crime of violence with purpose
to terrorize another... or in reckless disregard of the risk of
causing such terror or inconvenience." How does this apply to Ernst
Zundel?

It applies because the use of terror was not by Zundel but rather
against him. The persecution of Zundel is meant to terrorize the
general population of Canada into silence and submission to Jewish
rule. "This could happen to you."

A crime of violence has been committed against Ernst Zundel by the
American police. He was falsely and maliciously and violently
arrested by th! e use and/or threatened use of firearms. [Here I want
to put in a caveat: At least some of the five government officials
who came to arrest/kidnap Ernst were visibly armed. At least one of
them was wearing a bullet-proof vest as if he expected a shootout.
However, there was no display of arms, or implication that those arms
would be used. There was no need for that because Ernst offered no
resistance, and I was too stunned to even think of resistance - I
only asked to be allowed to call our attorney, a request that was
brusquely and, I believe, illegally denied.] Other violent means were
used by the American police to kidnap Zundel and take him to multiple
places of imprisonment, across state lines, where he was falsely
imprisoned.

"False imprisonment" is defined by Black's as "The unlawful arrest
or detention of a person without warrant, or by an illegal warrant,
or a warrant illegally executed... consists in the unlawful 
detentionin the person of another, for any length of time, whereby he 
is
deprived of his personal liberty."

But here is how Black's Law Dictionary views what happened to Ernst Zundel:

"Kidnapping. At common law, the forcible abduction or stealing and
carrying away of a person from own country to another. The unlawful
seizure and removal of a person from own country or state against his
will. In American law, the intent to send the victim out of the
country does not constitute a necessary part of the offense; the
unlawful taking and carrying away of a human being by force and
against his will being the essential elements. At common law
kidnapping was a misdemeanor, but under modern statutes such a crime
is a felony.

"A person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully removes another
from his place of residence or business, or a substantial distance
from the vicinity where he is found, or if he unlawfully confines
another for a substant! ial period in a place of isolation, with any of
the following purposes: (a) to hold for ransom or reward, or as a
shield or hostage; or (b) to facilitate commission of any felony or
flight thereafter; or (c) to inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize
the victim or another; or (d) to interfere with the performance of
any governmental or political function."

Legal experts and normal people can easily see how Ernst Zundel
might proceed against his [...] perpetrators once he is exonerated of
any malicious charge in the Canadian system.





More information about the Zgrams mailing list