ZGram - 11/21/2003 - A three-part Prisoner of Conscience ZGram - Part I

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

Zgram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

November 21, 2003

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

I am doing a three-part Zgram series on a very serious topic that has 
caused some heavy-duty disagreement between Ernst Zundel and myself. 
It hinges on what society calls  "psychopathology", sometimes called 
"psychopathy" - and if such a disease of the mind affects an ethnic 
group we all know well to an inordinate degree and could possibly 
even be catching. 

I am more than oversimplifying here!

My argument, doubtlessly influenced by my specialized training in the 
still murky science of the mind, is that "psychopathology" is a 
utilitarian construct that one can't classify as "either-or" - that 
criminality is always a matter of degree, just as is ugliness, for 
instance.

Ernst wants a test - this instance, if not earlier!

It can't be done,  I say.  Such tests, if they exist at all, are like 
a rubber band and give only approximations.   

Ernst glares and argues if smart folks can go to the moon, they can 
find out what's inside people's skulls. 

I say:  "Sure, go ahead and give some people a dandy excuse to yammer 
in your ear that it's an illness they can't help - that it is not 
their fault that millions have to die because of a rapacious gene. 
Hasn't Goldhagen already blazed that trail?"

He says with gritted teeth:  "We have computers.  We can pinpoint." 

He says.  I say.  And round and round we go.  We have for quite some time.

You'll get the drift of what this is about as you will read these 
Zgrams. I am simply setting up the clip to let you know that here's 
one topic that so preoccupies Ernst Zundel in his solitary cell he 
doesn't even always notice that he's sitting on a stack of 
transcripts a mile high that claim HE is the villain with a serious 
malady.   Surely not THEY!

Zgram #1 is a rather lengthy letter written to Mark Weber, Director 
of the Institute for Historical Review.  Zgram #2 is a Zundel letter 
to a long-time fellow Warrior for the Truth, a Jewish-French 
professor known by the elegant name of Polacco de Ménasce - a man of 
fiery energy, astounding opinions, and thoroughly heritical views - 
as you are going to find out in Zgram # 3. 

As before, I want to put on record that I am editing Ernst's writings 
because punctuation means nothing to him - when he gets excited, 
words simply run into each other - and if he takes a breath, that's 
where he puts a period.  The French professor's letter is brought to 
you "as is" because he is not a native speaker, and some expressions 
and concepts are a bit twisted, like pretzels.

Fasten your seatbelts - a bumpy ride is ahead:

[START]

(Ernst Zündel to Mark Weber):

I was recently sent a study by Kevin Macdonald on the neo-cons, and 
how they fit into his "defense mechanism" [hypothesis] he has been 
researching and writing about in $75.- tomes which read as dry as Art 
Butz's Hoax of the 20th Century.  A very small circle of academics 
will have the interest and the endurance, like Mark Weber, to plow 
through them until the end.  And then?  What good is that knowledge 
if it is not acted upon - if our "thinkers" don't take steps to blunt 
our opponents' power-seeking? 

Yockey says, "Power goes to him who seeks it, and WE have ceased long 
ago seeking it because we were so besieged and encircled that, with 
the exception of the FN of Le Pen, or the BNP of England, we in the 
European Diaspora simply circled the wagons and prepared like the 
pioneers in old black-and-white cowboy movies of the 1950s and the 
1960s for an all-round defense, as if we were Custers reincarnated. 

I felt like that for almost 25 years in Toronto.  After reading and 
rereading MacDonald's very insightful piece, I felt I should submit 
the following to him via you.  I do not have his address, and he 
might lend you a kinder ear than the Humble Peasant turned Security 
Threat.

Yesterday, I received a letter from Professor Polacco de Ménasce who, 
as you know, is half-Jewish.  By Jews, he would be considered a Jew 
in spite of his blue eyes.  I have visited him several times and 
interviewed him at length.  We have broadcast some of those 
interviews, and I did sell his booklet in English, French, and German 
on the "Silence of Heidecker on National Socialist "crimes" like the 
Holocaust. 

Polacco de Ménasce is a bit eccentric in his views, like so many of 
our friends and people in our field.  He was, however, a full-fledged 
professor on some French university, and his doctoral thesis is on an 
interesting topic.  Let me copy it down from his letterhead - These 
de morpho psycho endoctronology! 

He says that we are dealing with a disturbed group of people, to put 
it mildly, of the type that have caused you and me in our personal 
lives such embarrassment and grief, as well as pain, damage to our 
reputation and, of course, money.  In his recent letter he says, 
among many other pertinent and astute things, the following:  "I do 
think that you need much courage as I consider my peers are insane." 
He is offering his help to me by saying this:  "If, by miracle, I 
could do something for you, please let me know.  I will do it at 
once.  Writing to [Jews] is of no use.  It would be like a poultice 
on a wooden leg.  There is no possible discussion with insane people 
who think of nothing but domination and oil."

Now, Mark, that's remarkable coming from the son of a Jewish mother 
who had lots of hotels in pre-war France!

Here is what I hope you will do, after receiving and reflecting on 
this letter, since I cannot do it due to my current incarceration. 
Submit these ideas to Kevin [Macdonald] and see if he can see himself 
expand on his own thesis and ideas to add this "added dimension".  At 
least he ought to re-evaluate his work, revisit his own findings and 
assumptions in the light of what [Polacco de Ménasce] states as a 
fact after researching and studying his own people half a century, 
and having the guts to state his findings. 

Polacco de Ménasce was a high-ranking mason in France and in the 
upper circles of the Resistance Movement.  He is no lightweight, and 
I have interviewed him over and over again.  He completely 
understands [his people's] modus operandi - the use of cultural 
debauchery, sexual corruption, the destruction of morals, 
[destruction of] music, art, fashion etc.  He has written about that, 
too. 

He knows it is a centrally organized, directed and deliberately 
executed policy of our enemies - let Kevin call it a "defensive 
strategy" if he will, which up to a point, undoubtedly, it is from 
their warped perspective - because a weakened Western culture is a 
more easily manipulated  vehicle for their offensive goals, which in 
the latest case of Iraq was far more to destroy Israel's only threat 
and rival in the region than it ever was for oil! Saddam would have 
willingly sold to the West tanker after tanker full of oil, for he 
desperately needed the foreign currency for his sanctions-wrecked 
economy!

No, the neo-cons were not interested in what was good for America or 
even the Iraqi people - they wanted a "regime change", actually the 
most suitable for them for a Lebanon-like, multiple war-lord 
dominated/religious-factionalism paralyzed Iraq, representing zero 
threat to Israel for decades to come! 

So what "secret drummer" or "inner imperative" drives these heirs of 
Trotski - not one of whom was born or raised in the Soviet Union? 
Not one of them was even born when Trotski held sway!  And yet their 
modus operandi organizational pattern is distinctly Trotskiist - so 
much so that even not-exactly-steeped-in-Marxist-dialectics or 
Communist-organizational-methods American intellectuals have grasped 
it. 

I would call their "inner imperative" or road map a common mindset. 
Ever since I have become alert to [what I call] the Psychopathic 
Presence in our midst, my long-range radar has been probing my 
surroundings and especially the cultural/political landscapes for 
representatives or carriers of the affliction - and a schooled and 
alert observer could detect their tell-tale signs all over the place! 

[One of my long-time attorneys] alerted me to the problem I was 
having in my own life with a carrier of that mindset and gave me Dr. 
Robert Hare's trail-blazing book.  Even a cursory study of this book 
by the foremost expert in the world on psychopathology will impress a 
reader knowledgeable in Marxism/Leninism/Trotskiism that these were 
psychopathic ideologies.  It is not a big step from there to check 
into the ideas of Jabotinsky and examine the modus operandi and 
underlying goals and principles of Zionism, especially its post-Herzl 
form as practiced by its adherents in Europe in the 1930s-1940s, and 
in the rest of the world since the 1940s onward, to realize that this 
ideology, too, shared the same mindset.

There is not a serious student of history who will not immediately 
recognize that all the "isms" have one common thread running through 
them and uniting them.  All of them were spawned by Jewish brains, 
from Karl Marx to Trotski-Bronstein, Kaganovich, Uritzky, Bela Kun, 
Kurt Eisner, Radek-Sobelsohn, Theodore N. Kaufman - author of the 
genocidal Kaufman Plan, "Germany Must Perish" to its watered-down 
stepchild, the Morgenthau Plan, exhorting the genocide against 
Germans - Ilya Ehrenburg, Stalin's propaganda minister, Erna Pauker 
in Roumania, Hilde Benjamin in Germany, Berman in Poland, Slansky in 
Czechoslovakia - to all the killers and murderers who landed in 
Palestine during and after World War II and left a trail of blood 
behind, like their forebears had done in Russia and [Eastern] Europe 
before them. 

All showed the same modus operandi - regardless of what fancy name 
was written on their sails.  That modus operandi was violent, 
murderous, bloody and destructive - and all these movements were 
organized and run by Jews for the benefit of the Jewish agenda. 

Their form of warfare was virtually the same - whether the battle 
field was the movie industry and its fight for market share (Zanuch, 
Goldwyn, Meyer, Spielberg et al) or whether it was for a share of the 
illegal liquor markets in the 1930s with the Bronfmans, or just 
straightforward crime syndicates, white slavery, prostitution and 
gambling - from Bugsy Siegel to Meyer Lansky, same technique, same 
mindset!  Labor Unions, stock market frauds, fixing of professional 
games from boxing to baseball to football - always the same technique 
cropped up, with the same or similar sounding names. 

In Europe, it could not be hidden for long that all these destructive 
forces had one thing in common - they were run by Jews for the 
benefit of Jews.  The byproduct was the weakening or destruction in 
every field of Western civilization by subversion - no country was 
spared!  Many countries simply succumbed for a while - like Russia, 
Ukraine, the Baltic states, Hungary.  Only Germany fought back 
resolutely - and, for a while, gained the upper hand.

America and Canada were under massive subversive assault, and to the 
credit of America it must be stated that there, the military 
realized, long before the Germans or the British did, that there was 
what was then honestly labeled a "Jewish Threat."  A recent, 
astonishingly frank book by an American University professor, 
actually titled "The Jewish Threat" gloatingly spilled the beans.  I 
bought boxes of the book a few weeks before my arrest.  It makes for 
most interesting reading and reveals, once more, the mindset and the 
totally inadequate reaction and response to this phenomenon.

The problem everywhere was a lack of comprehension of the enemy the 
various nations of the world faced.  Their defensive measures were 
thus merely dealing with, or treating, the symptoms, not the root 
causes.  No doctor can cure measles by scraping away one red spot at 
a time.  The Jewish onslaught could not be halted by such band-aid 
measures. 

Some regimes, like Franco's Spain, Salazar's Portugal, Horthy's 
Hungary, Antonescou's Roumania, "treated" Communism by outlawing it 
and incarcerating its proponents.  Germany and, later, 
German-occupied Europe, went at it by suppression of some of the 
symptoms with more vigor on a wider scope, but even there it is clear 
by the way the Zionist movement was protected and mollycoddled, that 
no clear understanding existed. 

As to what the world was facing, everybody was groping in the dark. 
[Leaders] were thinking more in 19th century frameworks of either 
political parties, ideological movements, or cultural or religious 
ideas and groups.  The understanding of race was crude and in its 
infancy.  Shape, size of nose, forehead, cheek bones, eye color, hair 
color and texture were thought to be the marks of a race.  Nobody 
ever thought much deeper - except, of course, one man. 

Hitler realized that there was something seriously wrong with even 
the German approach to this vexing problem.  The first recorded 
evidence we have of this are some discussions of these questions 
during his famous Table Talks with guests and staff, taken down at 
the instruction of Martin Bormann by a battery of shorthand 
secretaries and stenographers. 

Hitler had always had an open mind and a less rigid approach to this, 
as he did to many other questions of the day, as is evident in the 
chapters about race and ethnic mixtures found in Hungary, the 
Balkans, Southern, Central and Eastern Europe - showing Hitler not to 
be a dogmatic 19th century racist in the (____ unreadable) Gobinean 
vein.  In the worthwhile book, "Confessions of a Confidante", Hitler 
points out some of the positive attributes of racial/ethnic mixes - 
for instance, the learning of languages.  Clearly, it was a question 
which fascinated him and occupied his mind, because almost 15 years 
later he returned to the topic at his dinner table - and while musing 
on the topic, came up with the pregnant-with-meaning phrase - a Race 
of the Mind. 

By then, it had become clear that the stereotype of a Jew with thick 
lips, greasy hair, crooked nose was just that - a caricature, which 
was totally useless as a classification tool for racial policies to 
be based on.  By then, the Germans had captured so many Jewish 
prisoners of war in Central and Eastern Europe, and had so many 
interactions with Jewish trades-people in Poland, the Baltics, 
Byelorussia, the Ukraine, Roumania and the rest of the Soviet Empire, 
many of them being blond and blue-eyed, that the old stereotype was 
basically useless.

Hitler also knew that many of the German Jews had so much of German 
blood that it was impossible by looks alone to tell many Jews from 
Germans.  Thousands were serving in German industry, in the 
Wehrmacht, even in the SS - like Eichmann and Gerstein, to name just 
two.  Jews were in fact in the officers' corps all the way up to the 
ranks of General, Field Marshall, Milch and Admiral Friedeberg, who 
committed suicide after the surrender.  A big, fat book has since 
come out describing Hitler's Jewish soldiers.  TV documentaries and 
films have been made about the topic.  So much for "race" in the 
Third Reich!

One of my researchers, while doing related research in the Federal 
Archives in Koblenz, found a study conducted as late as November '44 
by some Nazi government agency about the number of Jewish officers in 
the upper echelons of the High Command.  Clearly the German 
leadership was trying to come to grips with the problem - five years 
into the war! 

Hitler's astonishing concept of Jews not being a "race"  in the 
traditional sense or dictionary definition is proof - or better, one 
more proof - of his hallmark personality, of almost always thinking 
"outside the box."  Hitler had taken it upon himself to give the 
final approval of German soldiers being allowed to marry women from 
the conquered territories, and a certain amount of time was set aside 
for him to look at the photographs attached to the forms of the women 
wanting to marry Germans.  He once spontaneously remarked that he 
wished there were as many good-looking blondes in Germany as he was 
seeing and approving for marriage from Roumania.  Roumania is clearly 
not Sweden or Denmark!

The National Socialist government was alert to heredity.  A whole 
science had been built up around it, called "Erblehre".  Stringent 
laws were passed to prevent the passing on of hereditary diseases - 
by compulsary sterilization of the criminally insane, for instance, 
and also manic depressives - as early as 1934, one year after coming 
to power - because of the destructive impact this inherited condition 
had on the individual afflicted by it, on the families, on offspring 
and, as a result, on the well-being of society as a whole. 

It is not clear if this measure was taken at Hitler's initiative or 
not, but he had to sign all laws before they took force - and the 
reason for this draconian measure was clearly spelled out in the 
preamble of the law, discovered by one of my researchers in the 
National Archives in Washington.

It is not clear if Hitler was alert to or made a connection to much 
of the behavior of Jewish criminals of various fields and the 
murderous violence associated with Jewish revolutionary movements, 
the mental health aspects of this destructively murderous streak in 
especially the Bolshevik atrocities on the Eastern front caused by 
Ilya Ehrenburg's blood-curdling appeals to rape, torture, mutilation 
and murder.  I cannot believe a man like Hitler could have overlooked 
the connection - the one apparent common denominator:  they were 
Jews. 

Maybe Hitler did not make the conscious connection, but others did. 
The trail of suffering experienced by untold men and women at the end 
and after World War II by the interrogators, many of them Jewish, in 
Allied uniforms, described to me by John Sack, himself Jewish, and 
recounted in his book, "An Eye for an Eye", and also by Joseph 
Ginzburg, documented in his books and the TV documentaries I did with 
him - the fiendish tortures documented in the Malmedy Trials in 
Dachau and Schwäbisch Hall, which led to the Nye (sp?) investigation 
by the U.S. Congress, the beating and torture of Rudolf Höss, the 
former Commandant of Auschwitz by Jewish "interrogators" in British 
uniform, and the behavior by the Israelis in Palestine, the Irgun and 
the Stern Gang, war crimes and massacres at Deir Yassin, Sabra and 
Shatila by Ariel  Sharon, and later at Jenin in 2002 point to 
psychopathic planners and executors of these operations.

Since they took place generations apart, with different victim groups 
like Russians, Germans, Ukrainians, Hungarians and now the 
Palestinians in the Middle East - they have one thing in common:  the 
same mindset by the same groups of people - continents, decades and 
ideologies apart.

[END]