ZGram - 9/29/2003 - "Were there similarities between NS and Communism?"

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

September 30, 2003

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

A fellow named "Bruce" sent me a copy of a letter he
had sent to Dr. Henry Makow, who did a treatise on the
controversial "Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion", to be found at http://www.rense.com/general41/prot.htm
In a note to me, Bruce added:

"Ol' Hank did a pretty good job but I took issue with
his likening Hitler's movement with the Bolsheviks.
He's certainly different, I must say..."

I don't know if "Bruce" is right on every single point
he makes in the letter below, because I don't know the
history of the pre- and post-Weimar Republic all that well,
but I have heard enough people express similar opinions
that the letter below does ring true to me - it has more
than a kernel of true history.

You be your own judge:

[START]

Henry -

Great piece.  Very gutsy, as usual.

I agree with everything you write here except the
connection between the Bolsheviks and the German
National Socialists.

National Socialism was a counterforce, just as was the
PLO, to Jewish aggression.  Hitler's great initial
problem was how to separate the millions of unemployed
German workers from the Communist Party?  They were
unemployed because of the Versailles diktat, a product
of Jewish control of America and England.  The
thinking Germans could see what the Great War had been
about: the British-authorized and protected migration
of Russian Jews to Palestine.  The Balfour Declaration
was the only reason that America entered the war on
the British side, based on the blackmail by Untermayer
of Wilson.

The Germans were marked for extinction by the Jewish
allies.  (Kill the best goyim!)  As a Scotch-Irish
American, I can say that the Germans are the best at
most things except defending themselves.  This they
will not ordinarily do.  Hitler got them to defend
themselves from Jewish (Communist/Capitalist)
aggression.

Anyway, Hitler used the basic red flag to reassure the
workers.  He called it "National Socialism" as opposed
to Jewish International Socialism.  However, I don't
think you can find any similarities between the two,
or between NS and British Labor socialism or with any
other form of socialism, such as the New Deal.  All
National Socialism meant was, "Let's work together to
remove ourselves from the slavery and oppression of
the Versailles Treaty and the general world
depression."  Hitler said that National Socialism was
for Germans only, that it was not for export.  And it
worked very well for them in their emergency
condition.  As Hitler wrote to FDR in the German
declaration of war, In two years I brought Germany out
of hopeless destitution and starvation into
productivity and dignity.  What have you done, as the
leader of the greatest nation on earth, to alleviate
your Depression?

Jews were recognized everywhere - especially here - as
subversives.  But they had VIP treatment in Germany
and many today look back wistfully on that Jews'
Paradise.  Hitler complained about "that Goddamned
German objectivity - always willing to see it from the
enemy's viewpoint."

The Jews tried to crush Germany in the Great War and
very nearly did so in the Weimar period, with its
hyperinflation.  Communism was threatening to kill
Germany, which the Capitalists were already attempting
with economic warfare.  Thinking Germans could see the
future, and it didn't look so good.  It could well be
a war to the death of either Soviet Russia or Germany.

My point is that once aggression is unleashed upon
you, you have the natural right to defend yourself.
That's all Germany did.  She didn't start the Great
War and she didn't start the World War.  Hitler did
everything he could to avoid war with England, France
and especially America, despite dreadful provocations.
  He needed peace to complete the German economic
miracle - and he needed to destroy Jewish Communism
before it destroyed Germany.  This had to be done in
Moscow, not Bavaria, he thought.  Perhaps he really
knew that it had to be done in New York and
Washington.

WWII was created by the Council on Foreign Relations.
Policies antagonistic to Germany and Japan were
formulated by these rich psychopaths of the CFR (...) German
nationalism was encouraged and supported to make
Germany a credible threat worthy of a catastrophic war
against civilization.

Roosevelt persuaded Poland to attack ethnic Germans
living in the new Poland (somewhat expanded at
Germany's expense under Versailles).  Thousands of
Germans were slaughtered by the Poles.  Hitler warned
them to quit or else, but FDR kept goading them to
continue in their bloody delights.  FDR promised the
Poles that America and England would defend them if
Germany ever retaliated.  This proved to be another
FDR lie.  Six years later, FDR, at Yalta, presided
over the seizure of Poland by Stalin.

World War II was the worst thing that ever happened.
It should not be seen any longer through the eyes of
the victorious Jewish allies.  It is time to see it
through German eyes.  It is time to examine the
Morgenthau Plan, which was based on Theodore Kaufman's
Germany Must Perish!  It is time to read James Bacque
and also time to give up the fairy tale known as The
Holocaust.  See the Nuremberg Trials for what they
were:  Jewish justice!

And congratulations for writing a great piece on The
Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of
Zion.

Bruce