ZGram - 8/31/2003 - "Jurgen Graf: The Last Battle"

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

August 31, 2003

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

Below you have one of the best summaries of what the so-called 
"Holocaust" is really all about - one of the most terrible 
psychological weapons ever to paralyze Western civilization and to 
cooperate in its own destruction. 

This summary was written by Jurgen Graf, a Swiss Revisionist, now 
living in exile in Russia.  As the article states, it was written 
"... at the end of the year 2000" - that is, BEFORE 9/11!  Let us 
ponder for a minute what that means!  Was 9/11 necessary - because 
the Holocaust, as a weapon of psychological warfare, had lost its 
power, thanks to Revisionism research?  Certainly Durban made many 
people conclude this to be so. 

Then 9/11 happened - and, once more, Zionist power consolidated and 
asserted itself as never before, particularly on the American 
continent!

Read this incisive summary, internalize it, and pass it on - 
preferably to influential media and politicians:

[START]

The last battle
Jurgen Graf

"Achieving our quest for a new world order depends upon our learning the
Holocaust's lesson."

Ian Kagedan, director of government relations for the Jewish Bnai 
Brith organisation, as quoted by the Toronto Star, 26 November 1991.}

The transformation of the holocaust into a religion

The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with rational
arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked to believe in the
fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing factories which left no traces
whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no teeth, no ashes - nothing! We 
are further
asked to believe that the Allies, who had a large network of informers all over
Europe and a spy in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the
German intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until the
end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they would have
acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the Jews in Poland, the
epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything about the Auschwitz gas
chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise the Jews from the Lodz 
ghetto would
not have gone to Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as
related by Raul Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die
Vernichtung der europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).

As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is woefully
unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts to censorship and
brute force in order to silence the dangerous heretics. And the Jews are
gradually transforming the holocaust into a religion. This is a very clever
strategy, for as Robert Faurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a 
religion with
scientific arguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments
spreading like mushrooms all over America and Europe are really 
temples of the new
religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie 
Wiesel are the
priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion, we only have to quote
Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy mystery, the secret of which is
limited to the circle of the priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, 
The Holocaust
in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another
high priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further: "When
each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our
lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol.
20, Nr. 1).

No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are a
blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of 
persecution, the
Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National Socialism - the most evil
ideology of all times which made the holocaust possible! In today's 
Germany, it is
even considered inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of
communist tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is
regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime in
history.

French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long and
unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film is Shoa, the
Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by Jews as a synonym for
"holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the holocaust cult is to replace
Christianity:

"If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then Christianity
totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of
the humanely endurable, where he endured the cruellest suffering. (...) If
Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering with which that of Christ
simply cannot be compared. (...) In this case, Christ is false, and 
salvation will
not come from him. (...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps
modernes, Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.)

Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any more, but
virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The Zionist leadership
cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the World's Jews by keeping them in a
constant state of hysteria and persecution mania, insinuating that only if the
Jews stick together will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust.

It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace the
murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of people in the West
still believe that the official holocaust version is essentially true (even if
they suspect that the figures might me somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly
fed up with the eternal lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering.
They simply don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed
that a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust
monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single 
leading politician
and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose). Privately, the politicians
are probably as profoundly disgusted with the endless holocaust litany as the
rest of the population, but they cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists
win because this would shatter the very foundations of the "democratic"
system to which they own their careers and their wealth.

b) The function of the holocaust in the world since 1945

The political consequences of the holocaust since 1945 have been tremendous.
When I speak about the "holocaust", I do not mean a historical fact, as the
extermination of the Jews in chemical slaughterhouses did not actually take
place. But in the mind of the populace, this extermination is as real as the
Second World War or the Egyptian pyramids, while real genocides, such as the
artificially provoked Ukrainian famine in which several million people were
deliberately starved to death by the Communists in 1932/1933, are all 
but forgotten.

Let us have a close look at these consequences:

- The creation of the state of Israel

"Without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish state." This candid 
statement was made by a Jew, Robert Goldman (Frankfurter Allgemeine 
Zeitung, 19 December 1997, p. 9). Goldman was right.  Without the 
holocaust, the world would never have permitted the founding of a
Jewish state in Palestine three years after the war. The colonial era 
was coming to
an end at this time. The British had already decided to give India 
her independence, while dozens of Asian and African territories were 
striving to shake off the rule of the White Man. While other powers 
were rushing to grant independence to their colonies, the Jews in 
Palestine were allowed to embark on a colonial adventure par 
excellence, with the blessing of both the West and the
Soviet Union.  In order to ensure that their state would have a 
Jewish majority,
the Zionists proceeded with ruthless brutality; whole villages were levelled,
thousands of Arabs were murdered (Deir Yassein was but one of many massacres),
and a great proportion of the Palestinians were expelled from the land of
their ancestors. The ones who remained behind have been subject to severe
repression ever since. According to the very pro-Zionist Swiss weekly 
Die Weltwoche
(22 October 1992), no less than 15.000 Palestinian political prisoners were
languishing in Israeli jails in 1992, and the use of torture was officially
sanctioned by the Israeli supreme court in November 1996. As I am writing these
lines, Israeli soldiers are shooting unarmed Palestinian demonstrators, many of
whom are children, every day.

Jewish terror in occupied Palestine is not actually encouraged or approved by
world opinion, but it is tolerated. After all, the Jewish people need a
homeland to protect them from a new holocaust, and what are the 
sufferings of the
Palestinians compared to those of the Jews under Hitler? Let us beware of
illusions: As long as people in the West believe in the six million and the gas
chambers, they will always support Israel in principle, even if they criticise
the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh.

Without outside assistance, the Zionist parasite state would not be viable.
Its chief source of revenue consists of financial injections from America,
support from international Jewry and German reparations. According to official
sources, the Federal Republic of Germany had paid 85,4 billion Deutschmarks by
1992 (Der Spiegel, 18/1992), but the real sum is much higher. In 
addition, there
have been enormous deliveries in the form of commodities. Nahum Goldmann,
long-time chairman of the Jewish World Congress, made no secret of 
this fact; he
wrote:

"Without the German reparations that started coming during its first ten
years as a state, Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure. All
the trains are German, and the same goes for electrical installations and a
great deal of Israel's industry" (Nahum Goldmann, Das juedische Paradox,
Europaeische Verlagsanstalt, 1978, p. 171).

In 1999, Germany provided Israel with ultra-modern submarines which can carry
nuclear missiles. The Israelis did not have to pay a penny - the submarines
were another token of German atonement for the holocaust!

- Jewish Immunity [___ something missing here] of the Jews from criticism.

Before 1945, criticism of Jews was legitimate. Today, that is no 
longer the case. Even the slightest criticism of Jewish power and 
Jewish arrogance - for example the heavy influence of
the Jews in the mass media of the West, the staggeringly high number of Jews in
the Clinton administration, or the impertinent behaviour of the Central Jewish
Council in Germany - is immediately shouted down with screams about
Auschwitz. The effectiveness of this intimidation is demonstrated by 
the following
fact: The most obnoxious criminal organisation in the world is 
regularly referred
to as the "Russian Mafia" although virtually all bosses are Jewish, often with
Israeli passports. This is irrefutably demonstrated by Juergen Roth in his
documentation Die Russen-Mafia (Rasch und Roehring, Hamburg 1996). The title of
the book translates as "The Russian Mafia", for if it were "The Jewish Mafia",
the author would have gone to a German jail, and his book would have been
burnt.  In today's Russia, five or six out of the seven big 
"oligarchs" who made
their fabulous fortunes with money stolen from the Russian people are Jews.
This is never mentioned in the Western media.

- Creating contempt for the German nation.

Since 1945, the German people have been branded with a mark of shame. 
Self-contempt and self-hatred is the prevailing trend, while 
self-respect and patriotism are held in contempt.

After the 1991 war against Iraq, George Bush senior, who was then president
of the USA, publicly spoke of a "New World Order" which he did not care to
define. As a matter of fact, the "New World Order" means that America, as the
undisputed superpower, can impose its policy and its dubious values 
on all other
countries. And America is nowadays largely ruled by the Jews. (Even if Jewish
influence is much less pervasive in the Republican party than in the Democratic
one, the Jews still own virtually every major newspaper and most of the
television chains so that no Republican president can afford to govern against
them. In modern society, nobody can govern against the media, as Richard Nixon
learned to his disadvantage a quarter of a century ago.)

c) What would happen if the holocaust were publicly exposed as a fraud?

If the holocaust were publicly exposed as a shameless fraud, if people all
over the world learned that, while the Jews undoubtedly were brutally 
persecuted
during the Second World War, there was no attempt to exterminate them, that
the death factories, gas chambers and gas vans were a Jewish swindle, and that
the six million figure was a fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "New
World Order" would be all but finished.

Germany would become ungovernable; the German people would feel nothing but
hatred and contempt for the politicians, intellectuals and journalists who
betrayed and humiliated them day after day. The whole establishment 
of the country
would be hopelessly discredited. This the representatives of the 
establishment know. On August 15, 1994, journalist Patrick Bahners, 
commenting on the
trial of revisionist Guenter Deckert who was sent to prison for "holocaust
denial", wrote in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: "If Deckert's 
attitude on the
holocaust were correct, the Federal Republic of Germany would be based on a
lie. Every presidential speech, every minute of silence, every 
history book would
be a lie. Therefore, he [Deckert], by denying the genocide of the Jews,
disputes the legitimicy of the Federal Republic of Germany." The problem could
hardly be stated more aptly. Some German opinion makers now openly declare that
the Holocaust is the foundation of the post-war German state. This is 
shown by a
quotation from the influential newspaper Die Welt (28 April 1994):

"Whoever denies the truth about the National socialist extermination camps
relinquishes the foundations upon which the Federal Republic of 
Germany was built."

But also in other Western countries, the belief in the so-called "democratic
system" would be profoundly shaken as people would ask themselves why this
charade had to be propped up with censorship and naked terror for decades.

While the consequences of a public exposure of the holocaust as a fraud would
be most serious for the Western system as a whole, they would be catastrophic
beyond repair for international Jewry and the State of Israel. There would be
a world-wide wave of anti-Jewish feeling, and no non-Jew would be willing to
support the Zionist parasite state any more. German reparations would stop
overnight, and the USA would have to reduce its financial aid to Israel so
drastically that it would be bankrupt after no more than a year. The 
Jews in Israel
would be utterly demoralised, as they would instinctively understand that a
state founded upon such a colossal fraud has no moral right to exist. Since the
holocaust religion, which unites Jews all over the world, would collapse,
international Jewish solidarity would be a thing of the past. And the 
anger of the
Palestinians would assume gigantic dimensions as they would understand that
they had their country stolen and their sons shot in the name of a lie.

d) The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel

At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from the
military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its neighbours, and it
enjoys the unconditional support of the United States. Should any of 
the Islamic
states grow strong enough to seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably
be attacked and militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk
a confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can
certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters 
who are willing
to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland from the alien intruders,
but realistically, they have no chance to win. The Palestinians have stones
and slings. The Israelis have helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy
helicopters and tanks with stones and slings.

When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest spot. The
weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust lie to which it
owes its existence. The revisionists can give the adversaries of Israel and
international Zionism a terrible weapon. It is quite true that many 
revisionists
are by no means guided by political considerations. Some of them - Carlo
Mattogno is a good example - are only motivated by intellectual 
curiosity: They want
to ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World War. But
even if revisionism is not a political movement, its political implications
are tremendous. The revisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and
truth is the deadliest enemy of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the
revisionists objectively work against Israel and Zionism, even if 
subjectively their
goals are often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This
is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in
more and more countries.

In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing 
anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very 
difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We 
revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be 
explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the 
internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly
improved our possibilities to make the results of our research known 
to the World,
but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not every citizen of
the Western world who is informed about the revisionist arguments will
automatically become revisionist and anti-Zionist. The average person 
in the West -
and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden
exposure to the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I
have repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly 
accept the truth
about the holocaust, but as they know that even the slightest suspicion of
revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and legal 
persecution, they
understandably prefer not to get involved. However, if we want to win the war
against those whom one of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and
mankind", we have no choice but to destroy the Big Lie, lest the Big Lie
destroy us.

The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are
authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed Palestinian people
should make the breakthrough of holocaust revisionism their foremost 
priority. A
tank costs millions of dollars, yet one soldier can destroy it with a single
missile. The revisionists can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters 
with a weapon
not even a thousand missiles can destroy.

[END]

( Source:  http://www.ety.com/tell/books/jglife/15.htm )