ZGram - 5/11/2003 - "If evidence is missing, there is an explanation"

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

May 11, 2003

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

For a long time, I have felt that we needed to strip down Holocaust 
Revisionism to its most simple, basic dimensions and argue common 
sense.  Here is one such argument - brought to you by French 
Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson at his understated satirical best:



[START]

World War III Revisionism

If ever Americans and British do not find evidence of Saddam's 
"Weapons of Mass Destruction" or of Saddam's (six ?) doubles (in 
French : sosies), this will be the best possible evidence that those 
WMDs and those doubles really existed.

Remember the witchcraft trials, the Nazi war criminals trials or the 
Revisionists trials.

In the past centuries (especially from 1450 to 1650), according to 
some experts, there were allegedly sixty possible traces on the body 
of a witch that she had intercourse with Satan but, finally, it seems 
it was decided, in spite of descriptions made by those naive experts, 
that the best possible evidence of such an intercourse was that Satan 
had erased every trace; otherwise he would not have been Satan.

In the last century (especially from 1945), the same thing happened 
with the Nazi gas chambers and with the witnesses of the gassings of 
the Jews. There was allegedly a lot of evidence and testimonies but, 
finally, it seems it was decided, in spite of demonstrations made by 
naive experts, that the best possible evidence was that Hitler had 
ordered the destruction of all those chemical slaughterhouses and the 
killing of all the witnesses; otherwise he would not have been 
Hitler. As Simone Veil already put it in 1983 : "Everyone knows that 
the Nazis destroyed those gas chambers and systematically eliminated 
the witnesses" (France-Soir Magazine, 7 May 1983, p.47).

At the beginning of this very century (especially from 2002), it 
seems we'll have the same scenario with Saddam's WMDs, and his 
doubles.

If that is the case, the lies (and the liars ?) should be the same, 
and Revisionism of WW 3 practiced by Revisionists of WW 2 should be 
an easy job.

Robert Faurisson

[END]