ZGram - 1/31/2003 - "The Shoe is on the Other Foot"
irimland@zundelsite.org
irimland@zundelsite.org
Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:20:37 -0800
ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny
January 31, 2003
Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
Have the Jews of Canada forgotten how they restricted Ernst Zundel's
freedom of speech with all the censorship guns at their command? Now
they get a dose of their own medicine!
How sweet it is to watch what goes around will come around if you
wait long enough!
[START]
Daniel Pipes
National Post -
TORONTO - How fares freedom of speech at Canadian universities?
It looked pretty grim back in September 2002, when a mini-intifada
prevented Benjamin Netanyahu, former prime minister of Israel, from
speaking at Concordia.
Then a few days ago, Ali Hassan and his Middle East Students
Association did briefly succeed in cancelling a talk on "Barriers to
Peace" in the Middle East at York University in Toronto. But
President Lorna Marsden did the right thing and resolved that a
minority view -- mine -- had the right to be heard and would be heard.
The result was not your usual academic talk. I spoke in a
curtained-off section of the university's main basketball court. The
venue had been locked-down for 24 hours before the event. Admission
was severely limited. Only students could attend and they had to pick
up tickets the day before. At the gymnasium they showed
identification, then went through a gauntlet of metal-detectors and
friskings. A hundred police officers, some 10 of them on horseback,
hovered ubiquitously, tensed for trouble. Substantial parts of the
campus were blocked off.
As for me, several bodyguards took me through a back entrance to the
gym and sequestered me in a holding room until I entered the gym. But
surely the most memorable aspect of this talk was the briefing by
James Hogan, a detective in the Hate Crime Unit of the Toronto Police
Service, to make sure I was aware that Canada's Criminal Code makes a
variety of public statements actionable, including advocating
genocide (up to five years in prison) and promoting hatred of a
specific group (up to two years).
Though the event began very much behind schedule -- all that
frisking takes time -- and the acoustics on the basketball court
ranged between awful and atrocious, the lecture itself and the
subsequent question and answer period went off without a hitch.
My visit to York confirms, as if one needed more proof, that the
North American university has become -- in the words of Abigail
Thernstrom -- "an island of repression in a sea of freedom." This
problem was inadvertently but succinctly captured by a newspaper
headline a few days back: "York University to allow talk by
pro-Israel academic." Imagine that!
No other institution -- the media, the churches, the Parliament, the
corporation -- would treat a dissenting view in like fashion. And
does it really need to be pointed out that the university is supposed
to be a place for inquiry and debate?
The attempt to close down my talk also confirmed the specific
sources of hostility to free speech. In theory, these could come from
the extreme right, radical Christians, and pro-Israel activists; in
fact, they invariably and uniquely come from the extreme left,
Islamists, and anti-Israeli activists.
This motley threesome contains two distinct wings, the street toughs
and the academics. The rowdies make no pretense of accepting free
speech, as they showed at York in their posters that called on crowds
to "stop" me from speaking on campus -- nothing subtle here. They are
barbarians plain and simple who must be countered through rigorous
adherence to principle and strict application of the law.
Academics work more invidiously, maintaining a veneer of civility
while restricting free speech in such quiet ways as punishing
dissenters with poor grades, rejecting them for faculty positions,
and not inviting them to campus appearances. Even they, however,
sometimes reveal their true face.
My visit to York brought out the last two of these patterns. The
university's Centre for International and Security Studies made the
mistake of inviting me to meet with students before the talk; when
its head, David Dewitt, learned more about me and my activities, he
withdrew his invitation saying that these caused him and his
colleagues "unease." (I hadn't known security types to be made of
sugar before this.) The York University Faculty Association, a
powerful and authoritative voice, issued a formal statement out of
the blue accusing me of being "committed to a racist agenda and a
methodology of intimidation and harassment."
The fact that students had to go through metal detectors to hear me
speak on Tuesday points to the rot in our institutions of higher
learning, a rot that will fester so long as society at large ignores
what is taking place on campus. Improvement requires university
stakeholders -- alumni, trustees, parents, legislators, and others --
to note the intolerance and extremism on campus, then make the
necessary efforts to combat it.
[END]
=====
Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and founder of
www.Campus-Watch.org, a project to monitor, critique, and improve
Middle East studies.