ZGram - 12/8/2001 - "So why did Zinni turn to mush?"

[irimland@zundelsite.org]

Copyright (c) 2001 - Ingrid A. Rimland

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny

December 8, 2001

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

Today I want to juxtapose two articles.  The first one - selected quotes
only - was found on the Ha'aretz website, dated yesterday.  The second one
is a report filed by Phil Reeves in Gaza, reporting for the Independent.
The content in each speaks for itself.

[START]

Haaretz December 7, 2001

Bush-tailed, but still bright-eyed

The Americans have come out squarely on Israel's side, but Arafat seems
determined to persist. Security officials predict a long, bloody struggle
ahead.

By Amos Harel

Quote:  After months of sitting on the fence, the Bush administration has
chosen sides. No longer is it trying to play the impartial mediator, a la
former president Bill Clinton. Senior Israeli security officials could
hardly believe the series of public appearances this week by people from
the White House and the State Department. For a moment there, President
George W. Bush sounded like he was outflanking Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
on the right.

Quote:  National Infrastructure Minister Avigdor Lieberman wouldn't have
phrased it any differently. Bush spoke in terms of "we" (the U.S. and
Israel) and of a common, almost holy, war on terror.

Quote:  Bush's words were backed up by actions. Since mid-week, the U.S.
has been putting relentless pressure on the PA Chairman. The special envoy
to the region, retired Marine General Anthony Zinni, daily demanded a
detailed report from the Palestinians: Who was arrested? Where is he being
held? On what charges? And why doesn't the list of arrests overlap more
closely with the list of names submitted by Israel? Officials from army
intelligence and the Shin Bet noted with satisfaction that Zinni, clearly
shocked by his visit to the site of the Jerusalem suicide bombing, had
completely lost patience with Arafat's web of lies.

Quote:  President Bush added a move of his own: The announcement of the
freezing of Hamas assets in the U.S. is important, says an Israeli security
official, but even more important is the way in which it was done. When the
president himself comes out of the White House and makes a speech about
Hamas, which seeks to destroy Israel, the U.S. is practically declaring war
on 30 percent of the Palestinian people.

[END]

This is followed by an article that shows the consequences of the "green
light" the Israelis claim they have received.

[START]

UN chief accuses Israel of terrorising Palestinians

War on terrorism

By Phil Reeves in Gaza City

08 December 2001

The United Nations Human Rights Commissioner, Mary Robinson, called on
Israel to stop bombing the West Bank and Gaza Strip, saying that they were
"terrorising and terrifying the civilian population".

Her remarks, which came amid an intense Israeli publicity campaign to
convince the world that it is conducting a "war on terror" akin to
President George Bush's, were coupled with a call for Israel to allow
international monitors into the area.

She spoke on the same day that Israel, bolstered by reassurances from the
United States and Britain that it is entitled to "defend itself", sent F-16
warplanes to drop two large bombs in a Gaza Strip police compound,
surrounded by residential buildings and close to a medical clinic.

The force of the explosions was enough to blow apart two empty four-storey
buildings, sending lumps of glass and concrete flying hundreds of yards,
injuring 20 nearby residents and traumatising many more.

The bombs were separated by about 15 minutes, so that anyone who ventured
into the area in search of victims would have been at risk from the second
blast.

The same tactic was used by Hamas suicide bombers one week ago in
Jerusalem, whose attacks - provoked by the assassination of a Hamas leader
- prompted Israel to lash back with two days of aerial assaults, suspended
until yesterday because of bad weather. Twenty minutes after the suicide
bombers detonated themselves - massacring 10 others, aged between 14 and 20
- a car bomb went off close by, when the emergency services had arrived in
force, but luckily failed to kill anyone.

Yesterday's bombardment was not the same as the suicide bombing attacks on
randomly selected civilians, designed to slaughter as many people as
possible. Israeli commanders knew the compound was empty. But there was
nothing to suggest that the bombardment had much to do with self-defence.

The Israeli armed forces said that the target was a factory producing
mortars, and came after eight mortar firings on Jewish settlements -
illegally built in Gaza by Israel - within 24 hours. But the compound has
been bombed heavily before, so it was a highly unlikely site for a
bomb-making centre. There was no evidence of mortar-making equipment in the
detritus, spread over hundreds of square metres.

If it was an attack on Yasser Arafat's security forces, it was curiously
illogical. The same policemen now under intense pressure from Israel, the
United States and others to arrest scores of Islamic militants will be even
less inclined to do so. A day earlier, they battled with an angry crowd,
killing one youth, when they sought to place the spiritual leader of Hamas,
Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, under house arrest.

But the bombing was also clearly about sowing terror. Those who witnessed
the bombs - including The Independent, whose hotel was less than half a
mile away - heard two enormous crashes. The entire city must have heard the
sudden roar of jet engines, followed by a mighty crash, and a giant plume
of dust, visible even against the night sky. The sinister noise of unseen
combat helicopters could be heard out over the Mediterranean.

The children of Gaza who heard the crashes - not for the first time in this
battered city - will have another permanent mental bruise, and another
reason to hate. The police who heard it, knowing that their main
headquarters are now almost completely flattened, will have another reason
to fudge Mr Arafat's orders. And Mr Arafat will have another reason to say
one thing to Western diplomats and another to his people.

Once again, Israel's military conduct raised questions about Ariel Sharon's
ultimate goal. The debate on this issue took a new twist yesterday when
Bulent Ecevit, the Prime Minister of Turkey, Israel's closest regional
ally, revealed that Mr Sharon had told him Israel wanted to "be rid of" Mr
Arafat. "During my telephone conversation the other day with Prime Minister
Sharon, it became very clear that Israel was inclined towards war," he
said. "In fact, Mr Sharon openly expressed their desire to be rid of Mr
Arafat."

This is an ambition now shared by Mr Sharon's electorate. In a Gallup poll,
more than half those surveyed supported the toppling of Mr Arafat and seven
out of 10 backed what was described as "massive military retaliation".

None of this bodes well for the wildly mishandled attempts to use diplomacy
to solve this crisis. The bombings came a day after Egypt had sent its
Foreign Minister to meet Mr Sharon. Despite everything, a joint security
meeting, brokered by the US envoy Anthony Zinni, went ahead - but with no
hope of achieving much.

[END]

=====

Thought for the Day:

"Let him not boast
who puts his armor on
As he who puts it off -
the battle done."

(Longfellow)