ZGram - 11/1/2002 - "Australian Professor: 'On Iraq, the
churches must speak out'"
irimland@zundelsite.org
irimland@zundelsite.org
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:55:32 -0800
ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny
November 1, 2002
Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
This one comes from Australia but it has universal application for
all the Western Faithful. Critical mass seems to be building - and
if only we gain enough time, the (mostly Jewish) war hawks might not
get their war after all.
[START]
On Iraq, the churches must speak out
October 31 2002
One after the other, Australia's major churches - Uniting, Roman
Catholic and Anglican - have spoken out against the proposed war
against Iraq in recent weeks.
Moderators, archbishops, synods have all tossed their contribution
into the pot. They have claimed to speak for ordinary Australians.
The Uniting Church in Victoria has even courted the idea of civil
disobedience and of encouraging its members not to pay any war levy.
Why so? Why are the churches drifting into this oppositional stance?
Few church members are pacifists. Nor are they soft on terrorism.
However, they are affronted at the apparent willingness of the
government to sweep aside the legal framework of the United Nations
and to support a pre-emptive military strike. Unsurprisingly, there
are some distinctive moral and religious notes about their protests,
which flow from their prayers, their worship, their reading of
scripture. But they are getting political. Most church members have
already been profoundly alienated by the shameful treatment of asylum
seekers. Now this discontent is coming to a head. Ordinary church
people have had enough.
It's not just the leaders. A senior layman said to me the other day:
"I have never been on a protest march in my entire life. I have never
even contemplated civil disobedience. I have always paid my taxes
conscientiously. But I am increasingly ready to consider radical
action."
Church people note that the West's naive trust in military might is
coupled with a mind-boggling display of self-righteousness. Complex
issues are being personalised and opponents demonised. The overblown
rhetoric about a war against terrorism has all the hallmarks of a
crusade, with George Bush and Tony Blair as the clean-limbed angels
of justice. They see this as dangerous nonsense. Political leaders
with messianic pretensions overstep their God-given limits. Given the
shameful crusades waged in the name of Christianity a millennium ago,
church people are highly sceptical about crusades.
So the Australian churches, like most others across the world,
including the US, are asking: What is just about this proposed war?
Would we permit bombs to rain down indiscriminately on innocent
Australians if a Saddam Hussein and his henchmen were at large in
this country?
From a Christian perspective the proposed war against Iraq is on the
moral level of a Sicilian vendetta. Anything goes. The Geneva
conventions governing civilian casualties will be spurned. Every
principle of a just war is to be violated.
That is why many church people have had a gutsful, and are steeling
themselves for resistance, saying quietly but firmly that they cannot
and will not be silent in the face of this looming catastrophe. In
doing so they believe they speak not only for themselves, but also
for middle Australia. They are getting into dialogue with Islamic
neighbours, most of whose leaders and theologians have been speaking
out, largely unheard, in support of peaceful, just and long-term
solutions. They do not believe a pre-emptive war can be justified.
More poignantly, they doubt that it will be a war at all, but a
massacre.
It is an ancient tenet of the entire Judeo-Christian tradition that
there will never be security without justice. Our current world order
is grotesquely unjust. Such injustices do not in the least excuse
atrocities, still less the despicable fanatics who inspire young
people to commit them. But church members point to the gross
imbalances in privilege and destitution that create such breeding
grounds for terrorism.
So church leaders are refusing to be pushed into the sacristy. They
have a duty to remind those in power that innocent civilians will pay
the price for their glib rhetoric of death. As a universal faith,
Christianity also has to remind the white tribe that it is only one
part of God's family. Who gives the West a divine right to
restructure the world according to its preferences?
The nub of the problem is how the barbaric evil of terrorism is to be
overcome. The overwhelming conviction of the Australian churches is
that there are no quick fixes, certainly not demagoguery and the
brandishing of military hardware. They ask the West to take a sober
look at its own motivations. There are tough questions to be asked
about the real motivation for launching this war. The key forum
remains the UN, where the very difficulty in achieving a consensus is
the guarantee that, when won, it will stick.
The Pope, notoriously, has no battalions. As things stand, the
churches seem powerless to stop this juggernaut. But, as the
Moderator of the Uniting Church in Victoria and Tasmania has said, if
they represent the views of many ordinary Australians, John Howard
would do well to listen carefully to what they are saying.
Reverend Dr Peter Matheson lectures in church history at the United
Faculty of Theology, Melbourne University.
[END]
This story was found at:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/10/30/1035683473405.html