ZGram - 9/2/2002 - "The Last Battle"

[irimland@zundelsite.org]

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny

9/2/2002

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

=46or some time I have lamented that Revisionists did not have a simply 
but superbly written summary of what was done and what was 
accomplished by decades of diligent revisionist research - that the 
average person in the street really does not care about the 
significance of inflated victim statistics or lack of holes in some 
delapidated roof.  What people care about is that they have been lied 
to - callously and systematically lied to and manipulated for evil 
ends to a degree the gentile mind has difficulty grasping.   Today, 
searching the Net, I came upon a magnificent text in manuscript form 
- I am not sure if it was ever printed - written by the Swiss 
Revisionist, J=FCrgen Graf.  It is fine reading and highly recommended. 
You can find it at http://www.ety.com/tell/books/jglife/jgtoc.htm

Below is the last chapter of this manuscript.  Read it and pass it on!

Holocaust Revisionism And its Political Consequences

J=FCrgen Graf, January 2001, in Tehran exile


15. The last battle

"Achieving our quest for a new world order depends upon our learning 
the Holocaust's lesson." (Ian Kagedan, director of government 
relations for the Jewish Bnai Brith organisation, as quoted by the 
Toronto Star, 26 November 1991.)

a) The transformation of the holocaust into a religion

The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with 
rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are 
asked to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing 
factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, 
no teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that 
the Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and 
a spy in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the 
German intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide 
until the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass 
murder, they would have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to 
believe that the Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did 
not know anything about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in 
August 1944, otherwise the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have 
gone to Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as 
related by Raul Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die 
Vernichtung der europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).

As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is 
woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it 
resorts to censorship and brute force in order to silence the 
dangerous heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the 
holocaust into a religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as 
Robert Faurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with 
scientific arguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust 
monuments spreading like mushrooms all over America and Europe are 
really temples of the new religion, whereas professional "holocaust 
survivors" such as Elie Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. 
To prove this assertion, we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The 
Holocaust is a holy mystery, the secret of which is limited to the 
circle of the priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust 
in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). 
Another high priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes 
even further: "When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will 
be asked what we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget 
you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).

No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they 
are a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims 
of persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National 
Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the 
holocaust possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered 
inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of 
communist tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot 
because this is regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" 
of the worst crime in history.

=46rench Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long 
and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film 
is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by 
Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that 
the holocaust cult is to replace Christianity:

"If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then 
Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, 
who went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the 
cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a 
human suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. 
(...) In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from 
him. (...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps 
modernes, Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.)

Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any 
more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The 
Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the 
World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and 
persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together 
will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust.

It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace 
the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of 
people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version 
is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me 
somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal 
lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply 
don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that 
a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust 
monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single 
leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose). 
Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with 
the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but they 
cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would 
shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they 
own their careers and their wealth.

b) The function of the holocaust in the world since 1945

The political consequences of the holocaust since 1945 have been 
tremendous. When I speak about the "holocaust", I do not mean a 
historical fact, as the extermination of the Jews in chemical 
slaughterhouses did not actually take place. But in the mind of the 
populace, this extermination is as real as the Second World War or 
the Egyptian pyramids, while real genocides, such as the artificially 
provoked Ukrainian famine in which several million people were 
deliberately starved to death by the Communists in 1932/1933, are all 
but forgotten. Let us have a close look at these consequences:

- The creation of the state of Israel - "Without the Holocaust, there 
would be no Jewish state." This candid statement was made by a Jew, 
Robert Goldman (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 19 December 1997, p. 
9). Goldman was right. Without the holocaust, the world would never 
have permitted the founding of a Jewish state in Palestine three 
years after the war. The colonial era was coming to an end at this 
time. The British had already decided to give India her independence, 
while dozens of Asian and African territories were striving to shake 
off the rule of the White Man. While other powers were rushing to 
grant independence to their colonies, the Jews in Palestine were 
allowed to embark on a colonial adventure par excellence, with the 
blessing of both the West and the Soviet Union. In order to ensure 
that their state would have a Jewish majority, the Zionists proceeded 
with ruthless brutality; whole villages were levelled, thousands of 
Arabs were murdered (Deir Yassein was but one of many massacres), and 
a great proportion of the Palestinians were expelled from the land of 
their ancestors. The ones who remained behind have been subject to 
severe repression ever since. According to the very pro-Zionist Swiss 
weekly Die Weltwoche (22 October 1992), no less than 15.000 
Palestinian political prisoners were languishing in Israeli jails in 
1992, and the use of torture was officially sanctioned by the Israeli 
supreme court in November 1996. As I am writing these lines, Israeli 
soldiers are shooting unarmed Palestinian demonstrators, many of whom 
are children, every day.

Jewish terror in occupied Palestine is not actually encouraged or 
approved by world opinion, but it is tolerated. After all, the Jewish 
people need a homeland to protect them from a new holocaust, and what 
are the sufferings of the Palestinians compared to those of the Jews 
under Hitler? Let us beware of illusions: As long as people in the 
West believe in the six million and the gas chambers, they will 
always support Israel in principle, even if they criticise the 
Israeli treatment of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh.

Without outside assistance, the Zionist parasite state would not be 
viable. Its chief source of revenue consists of financial injections 
from America, support from international Jewry and German 
reparations. According to official sources, the Federal Republic of 
Germany had paid 85,4 billion Deutschmarks by 1992 (Der Spiegel, 
18/1992), but the real sum is much higher. In addition, there have 
been enormous deliveries in the form of commodities. Nahum Goldmann, 
long-time chairman of the Jewish World Congress, made no secret of 
this fact; he wrote:

"Without the German reparations that started coming during its first 
ten years as a state, Israel would not have half of its present 
infrastructure. All the trains are German, and the same goes for 
electrical installations and a great deal of Israel's industry" 
(Nahum Goldmann, Das juedische Paradox, Europaeische Verlagsanstalt, 
1978, p. 171).

In 1999, Germany provided Israel with ultra-modern submarines which 
can carry nuclear missiles. The Israelis did not have to pay a penny 
- the submarines were another token of German atonement for the 
holocaust!

- Jewish Immunity of the Jews from criticism. Before 1945, criticism 
of Jews was legitimate. Today, that is no longer the case. Even the 
slightest criticism of Jewish power and Jewish arrogance - for 
example the heavy influence of the Jews in the mass media of the 
West, the staggeringly high number of Jews in the Clinton 
administration, or the impertinent behaviour of the Central Jewish 
Council in Germany - is immediately shouted down with screams about 
Auschwitz. The effectiveness of this intimidation is demonstrated by 
the following fact: The most obnoxious criminal organisation in the 
world is regularly referred to as the "Russian Mafia" although 
virtually all bosses are Jewish, often with Israeli passports. This 
is irrefutably demonstrated by Juergen Roth in his documentation Die 
Russen-Mafia (Rasch und Roehring, Hamburg 1996). The title of the 
book translates as "The Russian Mafia", for if it were "The Jewish 
Mafia", the author would have gone to a German jail, and his book 
would have been burnt. In today's Russia, five or six out of the 
seven big "oligarchs" who made their fabulous fortunes with money 
stolen from the Russian people are Jews. This is never mentioned in 
the Western media.

- Creating contempt for the German nation. Since 1945, the German 
people have been branded with a mark of shame. Self-contempt and 
self-hatred is the prevailing trend, while self-respect and 
patriotism are held in contempt.

After the 1991 war against Iraq, George Bush senior, who was then 
president of the USA, publicly spoke of a "New World Order" which he 
did not care to define. As a matter of fact, the "New World Order" 
means that America, as the undisputed superpower, can impose its 
policy and its dubious values on all other countries. And America is 
nowadays largely ruled by the Jews. (Even if Jewish influence is much 
less pervasive in the Republicanparty than in the Democratic one, the 
Jews still own virtually every major newspaper and most of the 
television chains so that no Republican president can afford to 
govern against them. In modern society, nobody can govern against the 
media, as Richard Nixon learned to his disadvantage a quarter of a 
century ago.)

c) What would happen if the holocaust were publicly exposed as a fraud?

If the holocaust were publicly exposed as a shameless fraud, if 
people all over the world learned that, while the Jews undoubtedly 
were brutally persecuted during the Second World War, there was no 
attempt to exterminate them, that the death factories, gas chambers 
and gas vans were a Jewish swindle, and that the six million figure 
was a fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "New World Order" would 
be all but finished.

Germany would become ungovernable; the German people would feel 
nothing but hatred and contempt for the politicians, intellectuals 
and journalists who betrayed and humiliated them day after day. The 
whole establishment of the country would be hopelessly discredited. 
This the representatives of the establishment know. On August 15, 
1994, journalist Patrick Bahners, commenting on the trial of 
revisionist Guenter Deckert who was sent to prison for "holocaust 
denial", wrote in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: "If Deckert's 
attitude on the holocaust were correct, the Federal Republic of 
Germany would be based on a lie. Every presidential speech, every 
minute of silence, every history book would be a lie. Therefore, he 
[Deckert], by denying the genocide of the Jews, disputes the 
legitimicy of the Federal Republic of Germany." The problem could 
hardly be stated more aptly. Some German opinion makers now openly 
declare that the Holocaust is the foundation of the post-war German 
state. This is shown by a quotation from the influential newspaper 
Die Welt (28 April 1994): "Whoever denies the truth about the 
National socialist extermination camps relinquishes the foundations 
upon which the Federal Republic of Germany was built."

But also in other Western countries, the belief in the so-called 
"democratic system" would be profoundly shaken as people would ask 
themselves why this charade had to be propped up with censorship and 
naked terror for decades.

While the consequences of a public exposure of the holocaust as a 
fraud would be most serious for the Western system as a whole, they 
would be catastrophic beyond repair for international Jewry and the 
State of Israel. There would be a world-wide wave of anti-Jewish 
feeling, and no non-Jew would be willing to support the Zionist 
parasite state any more. German reparations would stop overnight, and 
the USA would have to reduce its financial aid to Israel so 
drastically that it would be bankrupt after no more than a year. The 
Jews in Israel would be utterly demoralised, as they would 
instinctively understand that a state founded upon such a colossal 
fraud has no moral right to exist. Since the holocaust religion, 
which unites Jews all over the world, would collapse, international 
Jewish solidarity would be a thing of the past. And the anger of the 
Palestinians would assume gigantic dimensions as they would 
understand that they had their country stolen and their sons shot in 
the name of a lie.

d) The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel

At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from 
the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its 
neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United 
States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to 
seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and 
militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a 
confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can 
certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters 
who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland 
from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to 
win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have 
helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with 
stones and slings.

When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest 
spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust 
lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the 
adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It 
is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by 
political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good 
example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to 
ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World 
War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its 
political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are 
endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy 
of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists objectively 
work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are 
often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This 
is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books 
burnt in more and more countries.

In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing 
anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very 
difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We 
revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be 
explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the 
internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved 
our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the 
World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not 
every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the 
revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and 
anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in 
Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure 
to the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I 
have repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly 
accept the truth about the holocaust, but as they know that even the 
slightest suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, 
economic ruin and legal persecution, they understandably prefer not 
to get involved. However, if we want to win the war against those 
whom one of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and 
mankind", we have no choice but to destroy the Big Lie, lest the Big 
Lie destroy us.

The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are 
authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed 
Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust 
revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of 
dollars, yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The 
revisionists can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon 
not even a thousand missiles can destroy.