ZGram - 8/21/2002 - "Another 'plain-speak' Sobran column"

[irimland@zundelsite.org]

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny

August 21, 2002

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

[START]

Why This War?

August 6, 2002

by Joe Sobran

      "And a man's foes shall be they of his own house,"
says the Good Book. Similarly, a man's own government is
apt to be his enemy. That's why the founders of the U.S.
Government came up with the quaint notion of limiting the
powers of that government and making it answerable to the
people it ruled.

      It seemed like a good idea at the time, but it
hasn't quite worked as planned. Domestic rulers, elected
or not, aren't necessarily better than foreign rulers.
King George III, as I point out from time to time, didn't
rule his 13 American colonies anywhere near as harshly as
the present U.S. Government rules us.

      Think of it this way. Would you rather deal with a
tax on the tea you drink -- even if you drink a lot of it
-- or with the Internal Revenue Service?

      That's why I was skeptical, back in 1990, when our
rulers were trying to convince me that Saddam Hussein was
my enemy. Sure, he was a tyrant, but that meant only that
he was the enemy of the people of Iraq. He wasn't hurting
or threatening me or my family, and I saw no reason to
send my son to fight him. Our own government was robbing
us every week.

      Among the reasons our rulers gave for the Gulf War
was that Saddam Hussein, if allowed to keep Kuwait, might
raise oil prices. How much? An economist I trusted
calculated that even if he also conquered Saudi Arabia,
the effect on oil prices would be slight. Not that it
made much difference to me. I'd rather pay $5 a gallon at
the pump than risk losing my son Mike. And I'm sure most
fathers felt the same way about their sons.

      Now as then, we have a President Bush warning us
that Saddam Hussein is evil. Well, most rulers are bad
enough, but that doesn't mean they threaten us. But isn't
Saddam Hussein trying to develop nuclear weapons? Maybe
so. But he won't live long enough to be able to hit the
United States with them; and even if he did, he would be
insane to do so.

      The European governments aren't unduly worried about
a Saddam Hussein with nukes, even though they live a lot
closer to him than we do. But the U.S. Government is
indignant at the very idea of his acquiring these
"weapons of mass destruction." Our rulers talk as if the
only regime that can be trusted to possess such weapons
is the one regime that has actually used them -- namely,
the U.S. Government. Oh, and Israel, of course.

      All this alarm over Iraq rings false when you
consider that we lived for forty years with a nuclear-
armed Soviet Union. The Soviets were infinitely more
menacing to us than Iraq is now. They trained nuclear
missiles on dozens of American cities. Yet after an
initial surge of fear, we learned to play ball with them.
Why the rush to smash Iraq?

      A growing number of states now possess nukes, and
the number will keep increasing. Obviously there is a
danger that some of these bombs will eventually be
dropped. But for the most part they are like the queen in
a game of chess: she exerts power even when she isn't
actually moved, forcing one's opponent to be cautious in
his attack. It's doubtful that Iraq would be eager to
nuke Israel, which has its own fearsome nuclear arsenal,
but a nuclear Iraq might feel safer from Israeli assault
and be able to play a larger role in the Middle East.

      But unless the Bush Administration strikes soon, it
will lose support for its planned war. That support, so
far, has been fueled by the dubious claim that Saddam
Hussein had something or other to do with the 9/11
attacks, so that knocking him out would be a triumph in
the "war on terrorism."

      But the only evidence for this claim is an unproven
report that an Iraqi diplomat had a single meeting with
an al-Qaeda representative in Prague. Even if true, that
by itself hardly warrants war on Iraq.

      When the reasons that are given for war are so
feeble, you can be sure they aren't the real reasons. The
war Bush wants will intensify, not lessen, the danger of
terrorism against Americans.

      Why does he want it? What is his real reason? Who is
our real enemy?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/020806.shtml".

Copyright (c) 2002 by the Griffin Internet
Syndicate, www.griffnews.com. This column may not
be published in print or Internet publications
without express permission of Griffin Internet
Syndicate. You may forward it to interested
individuals if you use this entire page,
including the following disclaimer:

"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available
by subscription. For details and samples, see
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
fran@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."

[END]