People from all over the world send me copies of their
    Zundel-Letters for my archives, as requested. After all, once this huge
    kidnap nightmare is over, we are going to have a huge Zundel Library, right?
    Right!
    For today, I picked one such letter I thought had an unusual
    take on current events, written to a lady friend in France. I will admit I
    edited this one a bit more fervently than usual because when Ernst gets
    excited about a particular issue, punctuation and orthodox sentence
    structure lose meaning.
    I tried very hard to keep this letter to the spirit in which
    it was written and meant to be read - so indulge me! I fuss when it comes to
    nouns and verbs in their appropriate places.
    
      Dear Yvonne!
      At 2.25 a.m., I woke up last night, bright awake, my mind
      going at full tilt! It was something Ingrid had said in response to what's
      going on in the Middle East involving the death of a high-ranking
      "Pope-like" religious leader. I said that it was [caused by] our
      Traditional Enemies. [She, in her] usual without-guile innocence said:
      "Why would they want to do that? Kill a Pope? A religious leader?
      What's that going to gain them?" I knew after we parted company that
      maybe [she] felt that I was locked up for so long I did not know what the
      heck I was talking about. So let me explain why I said what I said:
      The problem in Iraq stems from the duality of the
      "heads" grafted onto the American body politic - the
      "Lobby" power and the "Money" power. Thus we see two
      diametrically opposed policy goals at loggerheads with one another. It is
      horrible for a state to be in this position.
      There is its own national self-interest of the oil and
      resource sector of the American-military-industrial complex, as
      personified by Bush, Cheney, Halliburton, Bechtel Corp. and the Council on
      Foreign Relations crowd. These largely Gentile-dominated outfits wanted to
      steal the oil and precious metals not only of Iraq, but of that whole
      region, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrein - all these
      oil-producing areas, as well as Afghanistan, the gate-way to the ocean of
      oil, in the Caspian sea basin! That was the loot Bush and Gentile U.S.
      capitalist circles [as well as] the military arms manufacturers have had
      their eyes on for two decades, since Reagan's presidency. Why? Because
      China, India, Pakistan and South East Asia are motorizing so fast that in
      another short 10 years, those three countries will gobble up all the oil
      in the world now produced - in one entire year! Thus America, England and
      all of industrial Europe would be grinding to a standstill with an
      economic impact unequalled in human history.
      The Americans know about this state of affairs in the
      upper echelons of the ruling circles - like the Bush family and their
      friends. The Israelis and Jewish circles know it too! The Americans want
      the oil of the region. In order to pump it, they need to conquer, pacify,
      and reconstruct the area.
      That's their policy goal: No stability - no oil!
      The Israelis, on the other hand, need a chaotic,
      destabilized, at-war-with-one-another fractured Middle East. Divide and
      conquer! Play one faction against another!
      This has been their policy since the state was founded and
      has been the Jewish modus operandi since Biblical times! That's how
      "minorities" rule. Let majorities fight each other!
      Enter the Israeli Fifth Column, the neo-cons, who had
      wormed their way into positions of power. [They] decided and ruled at the
      most important levels of government, the media and, especially, the think
      tanks and the intelligence apparatus.
      That's why 9/11 was created offshore and allowed to take
      place by the "oil and resource lobby" - and the ruling
      oligarchy. Both needed a new Pearl Harbor!
      The theft of the treasures of the Middle East had to be
      camouflaged under some [fanciful] name or slogan. The "'weapons of
      mass destruction" was the fig leaf supplied, we know now - mainly by
      Israeli and Jewish agents and infiltrators, i.e. sources via the
      Likud-Sharon-Wolfowitz-Perle-Rumsfeld crowd!
      The Israelis needed to destroy Saddam Hussein, the only
      guy in their neighborhood who was ruthless enough and had the cunning or
      survival instinct to beat down his fractious population of various tribes,
      [such as] the warlike Kurds, as well as his religious fanatics. He ruled
      with a brutal iron fist, because nothing else can guarantee a stable state
      in that place since time immemorial.
      The Jews know that America is financially bankrupt, a
      powder keg of racial problems simmering below the surface, ready to blow
      like a volcano if ever there is going to be a depression or massive
      unemployment, which could be anytime. They had to act fast!
      Thus Wolfowitz, Perle, Kristol and their cohorts exploited
      the opportunity and ugly anti-Muslim mood created by 9/11, as it was
      designed to produce, by those who planned and executed it. They knew that
      they had only a small window of opportunity where the Bush/Cheney Cartel's
      policy would overlap with theirs. They had to do it in Bush's first term,
      because Bush the Younger was going to do Saddam Hussein in, which the
      father did not get around to doing because he tripped up, got the Jews mad
      at him and was thereafter unelectable! The Jewish-dominated media and Alan
      Greenspan's Federal Reserve policies saw to that after 1991.
      That's why [we saw] the frantic maneuvering and clamoring
      for war by the Neo-Cons, Israel's Fifth Column in America. They wanted
      that war so bad you could taste it, because they knew Bush's 9/11
      [popularity] windfall was wearing off - and increasing numbers of
      Americans were getting wise to [the neo-cons] everywhere.
      The Pentagon top brass wanted to wait, prepare better, get
      more troops etc. You remember the debate - they wanted at least
      200,000-250,000 troops and U.N. participation via Powell. The Israelis saw
      these millions upon millions hit the streets around the world in anti-war
      demos and decided to hurry things along with fake intelligence
      assessments. They basically lied the U.S. and Britain into that war - with
      both light-weight leaders Bush and Blair going along for cheap glory and
      the subsequent spoils! They knew the 21 million Iraqis were, by then, a
      "Fourth World" country, decimated by the 199[1] Gulf war and 13
      years of deadly sanctions!
      Iraq was one more time pounded into the dust. There was no
      contest ever - the results were a forgone solution! The Israelis got what
      they wanted - Israel wanted to smash Saddam Hussein via the U.S. military
      machine, because he was a thorn in their side for 25 years already. But
      they also wanted to cow and intimidate all the other states around them by
      the example of the utter devastation of Iraq - much like my treatment is
      meant to serve as a scarecrow [to frighten] the patriotic groups.
      Make no mistake about this "by-product"! This is
      almost as good as having a war, because the Israelis can point to Iraq and
      say: "Do you see the influence we have in Washington? We can get our
      "Golem", our American pitbull, to tear you apart any time we
      want! So watch your step!"
      The first one to see the light was Muamar Khaddafi, who
      [previously] refused to buckle under, even after Reagan bombed Libya and
      after the Lockerbie disaster in 1989, where 270 people were killed! For 14
      years, Khaddafi had always refused responsibility for the Lockerbie
      explosion. After the smashing and invasion of Iraq, Libya paid $2.7
      billion in compensation - a huge amount for those 270 victims - adding
      meekly that it "accepts responsibility for the actions of its
      officials"! (Newsweek, Page 4, Sept. 1, 2003). You can bet your life
      that the American behavior against Saddam Hussein and Iraq shook that
      money and apology loose! Terror speaks its own persuasive language.
      Especially Middle Easterners know that. Those who planned and executed
      9/11 and the invasion of Iraq knew it, and still know it. They are masters
      at employing terror!
      The Israelis and Jewish lobby have achieved their primary
      policy goals already. Saddam is gone, his military finished. Iraq is a
      basket case. And Israel will now do what they did in Lebanon in 1982 and
      after - destabilize the region, keep everybody fighting everybody. If a
      strong religious or political leader, or group around him, arise - simply
      have him killed! They have had this policy for 4,000 years, as is
      evidenced by a book published by a New York State University Press a few
      years ago, "The Role of Assassinations in Jewish History" or
      something like that.
      In living memory we have the famous Lavon Affair, where
      the Israelis were going to burn and blow up American consulates,
      information agency libraries etc. in Egypt and then blame Nasser's
      "Moslem hot heads" for it! Mossad did that in 1953. [The
      terrorists] were caught, prosecuted, hanged - the very rare time [where
      the Israelis] goofed up!
      Menahim Begin blew up the British headquarters in
      Palestine, the King David Hotel, with lots of casualties, civilian and
      military. Shamir and his assassin gang killed Lord Moyne, a U.N. official,
      without qualms or repercussion to them! Moshe Dayan killed people at Deir
      Yassin in terror-inspiring massacres, as did Sharon in Sabra and Chatila
      and in Jenin - again with total impunity, no sanctions, no war crimes
      trials, nothing!
      These people's chief stock-in-trade is terror - on an
      individual and on a state level. They have always been and still are born
      terrorists. "Targeted killings" of Palestinian religious or
      political figures and security men have been and still are Israeli policy,
      as was and is the deliberate maiming and wounding of children and
      demonstrators, deliberately shattering their bones, "hooding" of
      prisoners - which the Americans have adopted in Afghanistan and in Iraq,
      [as well as] concentration camps, such as the Americans have in Guantanamo
      Bay now, as well as denying of due process to prisoners or enemies, no
      habeas corpus, no freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of
      association. All these are instruments of Israeli occupation since 1948 in
      Palestine - and now in America!
      That Americans and Canadians don't want to see it - or if
      they see it, don't understand what it is really designed to do - is simply
      because the media and educational system has dumbed them down to a level
      hitherto unknown in the civilized world. They are modern-day zombie
      populations, led around by the nose - mentally so manipulated that they
      cannot think straight, much less act in their own self-interest either as
      individuals or as societies and states. They have become the tax-paying
      cash cows and playthings of an alien oligarchy both in spirit and in
      reality.
      What will that mean for Iraq and the U.S. role there?
      Newsweek, with its 4 million readers, asked the front page
      question in its issue of 1 Sept. 03: "So what's Plan B?"
      Why should there be a plan B? This war was a proxy war,
      fought by Israel's American pitbull, temporarily unleashed to destroy
      Israel's most dangerous local/regional enemy. That was the war aim of the
      neo-cons. That task was accomplished. Israel is today safer than it was
      for years, and will be so for years to come!
      The Israelis don't care that "meshuggene goyim"
      - that is, Gentile boys and girls - are dying in terrorist attacks. They
      are not Israelis. They are someone else's problem. The Israelis did not
      like that young Bush did not appoint a single Jew to his cabinet. They are
      still upset that Sharon was not received in the White House with open arms
      before 9/11 - and Powell's fair peace plan did not help! Why should they
      care that Bush's ratings are going down, that his presidency is in
      trouble? They are still carrying a grudge against Bush the Elder and his
      friend James Baker, that uppity Goyim, who did not sign the $10 billion
      carte blanche "loan guarantee" during the elder Bush's
      presidency! They never forget a slight!
      Was it not therefore fortunate, very fortunate, that the
      attacks on New York and Washington got the younger Bush's attention,
      straightened out his thinking and made him change his tune and policies in
      favor of Israel? Overnight!
      So what will happen in Iraq?
      Israel has been vehemently opposed to an observer role for
      U.N. Human Rights monitors, much less U.N. Blue Helmet peace keepers,
      anywhere they had anything to say. As far as Jewry, Israelis, the
      neo-cons, the whole crowd has anything to say, the U.N. is dominated by an
      overwhelming number of unfriendly Third World nations - who regularly vote
      against Israeli and American/Jewish interests. What they cannot control,
      make use of or manipulate, they usually destroy - even their bankrupt,
      moribund Soviet system. They are single-minded in that policy of
      ego-ethnocentricity: "Destroy what does not serve Israel and
      Jewry!"
      Since they do not have anything to gain from a stable,
      prosperous Iraq, they will sabotage anyone, any policy or initiative,
      overtly or covertly, which will lead to a normalization of life in Iraq.
      Chaos, civil war, riots, religious strive, poverty, unemployment, poor
      sanitation and even starvation serve their interests. It is their secret
      policy to ensure it stays that way - like in Gaza, the West Bank, etc.
      Enter the U.N.'s top diplomat and expert in "Nation
      building", Sergio Vieira de Mello, fresh from Geneva's U.N. Human
      Rights body, hated by the Israelis and the U.S. top brass alike! The U.N.
      wanted control over rebuilding Iraq - the U.S. and the Israelis loathed
      that idea. The Americans wanted mainly American businesses friendly to the
      Bush crowd to get the most lucrative "re-building" contracts,
      freezing most other nations out of these multi-billion dollar,
      no-competitive-bids manna-from-heaven deals!
      De Mello was appalled by what he saw in his nearly three
      months in Iraq and, according to Newsweek, Sept. 1, 2003, was fed up and
      angry enough to summon his chief U.N. spokesman, Salim Loue, and told him
      to "draft a public statement condemning U.S. military
      recklessness"! He planned to release it that evening!
      That statement, which put the U.N. on a collision course
      with the U.S. in Iraq, was never issued!
      Was it not an odd coincidence that a huge flat bed truck
      could blithely roll through all of Baghdad teeming with American
      roadblocks and military patrols, carrying enough military ordnance covered
      apparently by a tarpaulin, with 500 pound bombs, artillery shells, mortar
      rounds - over 1,000 pounds of Iraqi ordnance, says Newsweek! Uninspected
      and unsuspected, that [flat bed truck could] drive to U.N. headquarters,
      park right beside De Mello's office and kill him and [another} 24 people,
      injuring 86 more seriously, in a massive explosion! Vieira was blown
      apart, his body parts crushed under slabs of concrete, at 4.37 in the
      afternoon, while in a conference - no doubt fuming about his troubled
      relationship with America's chief U.S. Administrator for all of Iraq, L.
      Paul Bremer. Bremer is for Iraq what General MacArthur was for occupied
      Japan after Japan's surrender in 1945.
      What are the chances of someone loading a 500 pound bomb,
      which would take a crane or forklift truck to heave up from one of
      Saddam's ammunition bunkers, unto a truck unobserved? Ammo dumps in enemy
      territory are always guarded by high wire fences and troops, 24 hours a
      day, especially in war zones! Who on that day - before that critical U.N.
      statement, which could have changed the course of history in Iraq, went
      out to the world's media - had most to gain by this man and his closest
      aides being dead? On that day? At that hour? Think about it!
      What will the "Iraq" policy be now? Some
      newspapers explained it long before the war started: the same policy the
      Allies adopted towards the German state in 1945. It will be a brutal,
      all-stifling occupation, in fact a military dictatorship - a policy of
      dismemberment to weaken the conquered state into political and military
      impotence, slicing off and setting up a semi-autonomous Kurdish state -
      exactly as happened in Germany with the Eastern provinces East Prussia,
      West Prussia, Silesia, Sudetenland etc [lost to Germany]. In Iraq there
      will be Sunni, Shiite and other tribal areas, like the British [had] in
      India, which allowed them to control that whole populous subcontinent -
      230 million people at the time - with only 30,000 British troops, because
      the Indians were forever at each other's throats. Even ancient Rome did
      the same.
      Israel has survived 55 years by the same technique against
      its neighbors. Destabilize. Terrorize. Incarcerate. Subjugate. Keep
      [people] unemployed, impoverished and, above all, spread hopelessness and
      despair! Exile troublemakers. Imprison or assassinate natural leaders by
      calling them "terrorists" - that way, absolutely no one cares in
      the current hysteria. It's a license to murder!
      Will the Israeli policy work for the Americans in Iraq?
      Maybe. For the moment, Syria and Iran seem safe. Americans, unlike their
      Israeli tutors, do not have the fanatical racist superiority complex
      vis-a-vis their conquered population, because many of the GIs are
      themselves minorities - Latinos, Blacks from the ghettos of Harlem and
      Detroit. So far, only 77 Americans have been killed, only 500 wounded. The
      German Army lost almost 1 million soldiers killed at the hands of Allied
      guerillas - if the same "wounded ratio" is applied, another 6-7
      million wounded by these "freedom fighters" armed by the Allies!
      The Soviets lost 50,000 killed in Afghanistan by the U.S.-equipped Bin
      Laden Mujahedin, before they pulled out and then imploded and collapsed,
      never to rise again.
      When will America say in Iraq, "Enough is
      enough!"? Time will tell!
      Hard to say - with all that oil there still to loot!
    
    HELP KICK-START THIS SERIES, MEANT AS A FUND-RAISER TO HELP
    FREE ERNST ZUNDEL.
    FOR ANY DONATION OF $10 or more, you will receive a
    frameable copy of a sketch produced in prison by Ernst.
    Checks, cash, or money order are okay. I am working on the
    credit card situation since PayPal kicked me off after I raised a fair
    amount in just a few days for a full-page ad in a major Washington paper.