July 3, 2003
ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny: Now more than ever!
Canada is displaying still more of its dictatorship trends.
In the courts is a case against CSIS, Canada's civilian spy agency, about
its foreknowledge - if that is all! - of an airline crash caused by a
suitcase bomb that killed more than 300 people some 20 years ago. And yet SECRECY
is written all over this trial!
This trial is of significance to Ernst Zundel since, as we
have stated many times, CSIS knew of a parcel bomb in transit on a passenger
plane, to be delivered to the Zundel-Haus, and yet did nothing to prevent
delivery or even warn the Zundel-Haus inhabitants.
Zundel-Friends are watching this trial closely.
From Paul Fromm, Director of the CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR
FREE EXPRESSION:
[START]
SICKENING SECRECY SHROUDS AIR INDIA TRIAL
Dear Free Speech Supporter:
Part of a functioning democracy is openness or
"transparency" to use the currrent jargon. How can citizens
participate knowledgeably if they're given the mushroom treatment: kept in
the dark and fed manure?
Canada's political elite is obsessed with secrecy --
usually to cover their graft, incompetence or criminality. Thus, it is a
disturbing sign that the VANCOUVER SUN's lawyer couldn't even gain access
to a courtroom to make a motion for release of warrants relating to the
Air India case. The warrants involve a man alleged to be a CSIS agent at
the very top of the Sikh extremist conspiracy that led to the bombing of
Air India.
There's a serious issue here. Did the informant tell his
CSIS masters of the plot? If not, he was a double-agent and should be
pursued, but has not been. He's living unbothered in England. If he DID
tell CSIS, then why was the plot not stopped before more than 300
travellers were killed? Was it CSIS incompetence? Was it ...? The mind
boggles.
We do know from Andrew Mitrovica's book COVERT ENTRY that
CSIS knew an anarchist bomb had been sent to Ernst Zundel in May, 1995.
While they warned their mail snoops, they didn't warn Mr. Zundel or the
postal employees who handled the parcel.
The public has a right to know and, as all too often
happens, the courts merrily play along and impose information bans. The
current Zundel case is a prime example. Both his several detention
hearings and his current hearing in federal Court have heard secret
testimony from CSIS, to which Mr. Zundel was denied all access.
- Paul Fromm
- Director
- CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
-
B.C. judge dismisses application for information in Air
India case
CAMILLE BAINS Canadian Press
Friday, June 27, 2003
VANCOUVER (CP) - A B.C. Supreme Court judge has dismissed an
application to release edited information from two search warrants involving
a man who may have played a role in the Air India bombings.
Surjan Singh Gill was identified in court documents released
last month as a possible informant for the Canadian Security Intelligence
Service. CSIS has denied an agent infiltrated a network of Sikh extremists
believed to be involved in the Air India disaster.
The CBC had filed the application for the search warrants
and information used to obtain them in relation to Gill, whose home and the
vehicle of one of his relatives was searched by the RCMP in November 1996.
The documents were sealed until last week and were released
with the contents of 10 paragraphs obliterated.
The released information showed that police were ready to
charge Gill, along with five other men, with four counts including
first-degree murder and conspiracy in the Air India bombings. But Gill, who
now lives in England, has never been charged.
Justice Ian Josephson said in his written decision released
Friday that informer privilege, involving two other individuals, is of such
importance that it cannot be balanced against the public interest.
Josephson also denied the release of information obtained
through wiretaps involving Ajaib Singh Bagri and Ripudaman Singh Malik.
Both men are accused in the deaths of 331 people in two
separate bombings targeting Air India planes on June 23, 1985. Their trial
resumes in the fall.
Court heard last week that the Crown is also against the
release of the information based on the affidavit of an RCMP officer who
said it would put the safety of the informants and their families at risk.
Josephson agreed with the Mountie.
Malik and Bagri's lawyers also opposed the release of such
information, saying it is speculative, unreliable and prejudicial to their
clients.
"In addition, Mr. Malik submits that the information
contained in those paragraphs is inconsistent with the proposed evidence and
theory of the Crown," Josephson said in his ruling.
A lawyer for Bagri said in court last week that he was aware
of the identity of the source in one paragraph of the information to obtain
the search warrants.
Josephson said the information has also been disclosed to
the defence, increasing the safety risk.
"I am . . . of the opinion that due to the
extraordinary nature of this case, the release of this information into the
public domain would result in a significant and unwarranted increase in that
risk," he wrote.
The Crown was also against the release of wiretaps because
the Criminal Code makes it an offence to disclose such evidence without the
consent of one of the participants in the private conversation.
The other men listed in the four counts include Malik and
Bagri, who now face eight counts of first-degree murder, conspiracy and
other charges.
Inderjit Singh Reyat, Hardial Singh Johal and Talwinder
Singh Parmar are also named in the four counts.
Reyat was convicted in February of manslaughter for his part
in the bombing of Air India Flight 182, and is serving a controversial
five-year sentence.
All 329 crew and passengers - mostly Canadian - died when
the aircraft plunged into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Ireland on
June 23, 1985, after a suitcase bomb exploded.
Reyat has already served a 10-year sentence for his role in
another suitcase bomb blast less than an hour earlier at Tokyo's Narita
airport, where two baggage handlers died. The luggage was destined for
another Air India flight.
Johal died in Vancouver last year after an illness, and
Parmar, who was believed to be the mastermind of the bombing conspiracy, was
killed by Indian police in 1992.
Parmar was also chief of the Babbar Khalsa, a terrorist
group banned earlier this month by the Canadian government.
The group of Sikh separatists advocated violence in their
quest to carve out an independent homeland from India's Punjab province.
The search warrant documents released last week said Gill
had suddenly resigned as a member of the Babbar Khalsa, days before the Air
India disaster, which resulted in Canada's worst mass murder case.
The Babbar Khalsa was one of the Sikh extremist
organizations seeking revenge against the Indian government through its
nationally owned airline.
That was after the Indian government ordered the Indian Army
to storm the Golden Temple in Amritsar, India, a year before the bombings.
[END]
Write to Canada's Immigration Minister and complain
over the unfair treatment Ernst Zündel has received.
Immigration Minister Denis Coderre
House of Commons
Parliament Buildings
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6
Telephone: (613) 995-6108
Fax: (613) 995-9755
Email: Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca |
|