Below you have one of the best summaries of what the
so-called "Holocaust" is really all about - one of the most
terrible psychological weapons ever to paralyze Western civilization and to
cooperate in its own destruction.
This summary was written by Jurgen Graf, a Swiss
Revisionist, now living in exile in Russia. As the article states, it was
written "... at the end of the year 2000" - that is, BEFORE 9/11!
Let us ponder for a minute what that means! Was 9/11 necessary - because the
Holocaust, as a weapon of psychological warfare, had lost its power, thanks
to Revisionism research? Certainly Durban made many people conclude this to
be so.
Then 9/11 happened - and, once more, Zionist power
consolidated and asserted itself as never before, particularly on the
American continent!
Read this incisive summary, internalize it, and pass it on -
preferably to influential media and politicians:
[START]
The last battle
Jurgen Graf
"Achieving our quest for a new world order depends
upon our learning the Holocaust's lesson."
Ian Kagedan, director of government relations for the
Jewish Bnai Brith organisation, as quoted by the Toronto Star, 26 November
1991.}
The transformation of the holocaust into a religion
The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended
with rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are
asked to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing
factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no
teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the
Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy in
the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German
intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until the
end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they would
have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the Jews in
Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything about the
Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise the Jews from
the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz voluntarily - which is
precisely what they did, as related by Raul Hilberg in his standard work
about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung der europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).
As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western
democracies" is woefully unable to counter the revisionists with
arguments, it resorts to censorship and brute force in order to silence
the dangerous heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the
holocaust into a religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert
Faurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific
arguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreading
like mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new
religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as
Elie Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion,
we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy
mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the priesthood of
survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p.
211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high priest of the
holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further: "When each of us
comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our
lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in
Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).
No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed
because they are a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal
victims of persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National
Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the holocaust
possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered inadmissible to
compare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist tyrants such as
Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is regarded as a "relativisation"
and "trivialization" of the worst crime in history.
French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer
of a long and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this
film is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often
used by Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to
conceal that the holocaust cult is to replace Christianity:
"If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of
history, then Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son
of God, who went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured
the cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human
suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...) In
this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him. (...)
Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes, Paris,
December 1993, p. 132, 133.)
Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in
God any more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The
Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the World's
Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and persecution
mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together will they be able
to ban the threat of a new holocaust.
It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing
to embrace the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority
of people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version is
essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me somewhat
inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal lamentation about
Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply don't want to hear it any
more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that a vast majority of the
population was against the planned holocaust monument in Berlin (which not
a single major party, not a single leading politician and not a single big
newspaper dared to oppose). Privately, the politicians are probably as
profoundly disgusted with the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the
population, but they cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win
because this would shatter the very foundations of the
"democratic" system to which they own their careers and their
wealth.
b) The function of the holocaust in the world since 1945
The political consequences of the holocaust since 1945
have been tremendous. When I speak about the "holocaust", I do
not mean a historical fact, as the extermination of the Jews in chemical
slaughterhouses did not actually take place. But in the mind of the
populace, this extermination is as real as the Second World War or the
Egyptian pyramids, while real genocides, such as the artificially provoked
Ukrainian famine in which several million people were deliberately starved
to death by the Communists in 1932/1933, are all but forgotten.
Let us have a close look at these consequences:
- The creation of the state of Israel
"Without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish
state." This candid statement was made by a Jew, Robert Goldman
(Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 19 December 1997, p. 9). Goldman was
right. Without the holocaust, the world would never have permitted the
founding of a Jewish state in Palestine three years after the war. The
colonial era was coming to an end at this time. The British had already
decided to give India her independence, while dozens of Asian and African
territories were striving to shake off the rule of the White Man. While
other powers were rushing to grant independence to their colonies, the
Jews in Palestine were allowed to embark on a colonial adventure par
excellence, with the blessing of both the West and the Soviet Union. In
order to ensure that their state would have a Jewish majority, the
Zionists proceeded with ruthless brutality; whole villages were levelled,
thousands of Arabs were murdered (Deir Yassein was but one of many
massacres), and a great proportion of the Palestinians were expelled from
the land of their ancestors. The ones who remained behind have been
subject to severe repression ever since. According to the very pro-Zionist
Swiss weekly Die Weltwoche (22 October 1992), no less than 15.000
Palestinian political prisoners were languishing in Israeli jails in 1992,
and the use of torture was officially sanctioned by the Israeli supreme
court in November 1996. As I am writing these lines, Israeli soldiers are
shooting unarmed Palestinian demonstrators, many of whom are children,
every day.
Jewish terror in occupied Palestine is not actually
encouraged or approved by world opinion, but it is tolerated. After all,
the Jewish people need a homeland to protect them from a new holocaust,
and what are the sufferings of the Palestinians compared to those of the
Jews under Hitler? Let us beware of illusions: As long as people in the
West believe in the six million and the gas chambers, they will always
support Israel in principle, even if they criticise the Israeli treatment
of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh.
Without outside assistance, the Zionist parasite state
would not be viable. Its chief source of revenue consists of financial
injections from America, support from international Jewry and German
reparations. According to official sources, the Federal Republic of
Germany had paid 85,4 billion Deutschmarks by 1992 (Der Spiegel, 18/1992),
but the real sum is much higher. In addition, there have been enormous
deliveries in the form of commodities. Nahum Goldmann, long-time chairman
of the Jewish World Congress, made no secret of this fact; he wrote:
"Without the German reparations that started coming
during its first ten years as a state, Israel would not have half of its
present infrastructure. All the trains are German, and the same goes for
electrical installations and a great deal of Israel's industry"
(Nahum Goldmann, Das juedische Paradox, Europaeische Verlagsanstalt, 1978,
p. 171).
In 1999, Germany provided Israel with ultra-modern
submarines which can carry nuclear missiles. The Israelis did not have to
pay a penny - the submarines were another token of German atonement for
the holocaust!
- Jewish Immunity [___ something missing here] of the Jews
from criticism.
Before 1945, criticism of Jews was legitimate. Today, that
is no longer the case. Even the slightest criticism of Jewish power and
Jewish arrogance - for example the heavy influence of the Jews in the mass
media of the West, the staggeringly high number of Jews in the Clinton
administration, or the impertinent behaviour of the Central Jewish Council
in Germany - is immediately shouted down with screams about Auschwitz. The
effectiveness of this intimidation is demonstrated by the following fact:
The most obnoxious criminal organisation in the world is regularly
referred to as the "Russian Mafia" although virtually all bosses
are Jewish, often with Israeli passports. This is irrefutably demonstrated
by Juergen Roth in his documentation Die Russen-Mafia (Rasch und Roehring,
Hamburg 1996). The title of the book translates as "The Russian
Mafia", for if it were "The Jewish Mafia", the author would
have gone to a German jail, and his book would have been burnt. In today's
Russia, five or six out of the seven big "oligarchs" who made
their fabulous fortunes with money stolen from the Russian people are
Jews. This is never mentioned in the Western media.
- Creating contempt for the German nation.
Since 1945, the German people have been branded with a
mark of shame. Self-contempt and self-hatred is the prevailing trend,
while self-respect and patriotism are held in contempt.
After the 1991 war against Iraq, George Bush senior, who
was then president of the USA, publicly spoke of a "New World
Order" which he did not care to define. As a matter of fact, the
"New World Order" means that America, as the undisputed
superpower, can impose its policy and its dubious values on all other
countries. And America is nowadays largely ruled by the Jews. (Even if
Jewish influence is much less pervasive in the Republican party than in
the Democratic one, the Jews still own virtually every major newspaper and
most of the television chains so that no Republican president can afford
to govern against them. In modern society, nobody can govern against the
media, as Richard Nixon learned to his disadvantage a quarter of a century
ago.)
c) What would happen if the holocaust were publicly
exposed as a fraud?
If the holocaust were publicly exposed as a shameless
fraud, if people all over the world learned that, while the Jews
undoubtedly were brutally persecuted during the Second World War, there
was no attempt to exterminate them, that the death factories, gas chambers
and gas vans were a Jewish swindle, and that the six million figure was a
fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "New World Order" would
be all but finished.
Germany would become ungovernable; the German people would
feel nothing but hatred and contempt for the politicians, intellectuals
and journalists who betrayed and humiliated them day after day. The whole
establishment of the country would be hopelessly discredited. This the
representatives of the establishment know. On August 15, 1994, journalist
Patrick Bahners, commenting on the trial of revisionist Guenter Deckert
who was sent to prison for "holocaust denial", wrote in the
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: "If Deckert's attitude on the
holocaust were correct, the Federal Republic of Germany would be based on
a lie. Every presidential speech, every minute of silence, every history
book would be a lie. Therefore, he [Deckert], by denying the genocide of
the Jews, disputes the legitimicy of the Federal Republic of
Germany." The problem could hardly be stated more aptly. Some German
opinion makers now openly declare that the Holocaust is the foundation of
the post-war German state. This is shown by a quotation from the
influential newspaper Die Welt (28 April 1994):
"Whoever denies the truth about the National
socialist extermination camps relinquishes the foundations upon which the
Federal Republic of Germany was built."
But also in other Western countries, the belief in the
so-called "democratic system" would be profoundly shaken as
people would ask themselves why this charade had to be propped up with
censorship and naked terror for decades.
While the consequences of a public exposure of the
holocaust as a fraud would be most serious for the Western system as a
whole, they would be catastrophic beyond repair for international Jewry
and the State of Israel. There would be a world-wide wave of anti-Jewish
feeling, and no non-Jew would be willing to support the Zionist parasite
state any more. German reparations would stop overnight, and the USA would
have to reduce its financial aid to Israel so drastically that it would be
bankrupt after no more than a year. The Jews in Israel would be utterly
demoralised, as they would instinctively understand that a state founded
upon such a colossal fraud has no moral right to exist. Since the
holocaust religion, which unites Jews all over the world, would collapse,
international Jewish solidarity would be a thing of the past. And the
anger of the Palestinians would assume gigantic dimensions as they would
understand that they had their country stolen and their sons shot in the
name of a lie.
d) The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of
Israel
At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country,
but from the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its
neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United States.
Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to seriously threaten
Israel, it would most probably be attacked and militarily annihilated by
America. Russia is not likely to risk a confrontation with the USA for the
sake of the Palestinians. We can certainly admire the bravery of the
Palestinians resistance fighters who are willing to sacrifice their lives
to liberate their homeland from the alien intruders, but realistically,
they have no chance to win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The
Israelis have helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and
tanks with stones and slings.
When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his
weakest spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the
holocaust lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give
the adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It
is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by political
considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good example - are only
motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to ascertain what really
happened to the Jews during the Second World War. But even if revisionism
is not a political movement, its political implications are tremendous.
The revisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the
deadliest enemy of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists
objectively work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their
goals are often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition.
This is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books
burnt in more and more countries.
In view of the total Jewish media control and the
ever-growing anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is
very difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We
revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be
explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the
internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved our
possibilities to make the results of our research known to the World, but
all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not every citizen of
the Western world who is informed about the revisionist arguments will
automatically become revisionist and anti-Zionist. The average person in
the West - and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughly
brainwashed that a sudden exposure to the truth can provoke a nervous
breakdown or stomach cramps. I have repeatedly witnessed this myself.
Other people would gladly accept the truth about the holocaust, but as
they know that even the slightest suspicion of revisionism leads to social
ostracism, economic ruin and legal persecution, they understandably prefer
not to get involved. However, if we want to win the war against those whom
one of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and
mankind", we have no choice but to destroy the Big Lie, lest the Big
Lie destroy us.
The logical consequence of all this is that those
countries which are authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the
oppressed Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust
revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars, yet
one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists can
provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a thousand
missiles can destroy.
