When I read the Faurisson piece below to Ernst Zundel, he
said after a brief silence: "He dances like a butterfly - and stings
like a bee." I believe this is the best summary yet that has the
potential of moving Holocaust Revisionism into mainstream awareness in the
Western world.
Please memorize it. Copy and disperse it. Post it wherever
you can. Spread it to the snoozing masses. It all but shouts at you:
"Think!"
"Hitler's and Saddam's Weapons of Mass
Destruction"
Is it not simply wondrous to be told the same lie twice by
the same people and for the same purpose at nearly sixty years' distance?
In January 1944, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt
decided to create, on the advice of the Jew Henry Morgenthau and his
cohorts, the so-called War Refugee Board (WRB). In November 1944, that
official body published, under the heading "Executive Office of the
President / War Refugee Board / Washington, DC" a report entitled
"German Extermination Camps Auschwitz and Birkenau", falsely
accusing Adolf Hitler of possessing weapons of mass destruction or WMD's
(called execution gas chambers).
In 2002, President George W. Bush decided to create, on
the advice of the Jew Paul Wolfowitz and his cohorts, the so-called Office
of Special Plans (OSP). Headed by Abram Shulsky, that official body
promoted reports falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of having WMD's.
The lie was the same: an accusation based on false
evidence. The people were the same sort: powerful American Jews. The
purpose was the same: war.
But there were also differences. First, the lie against
Hitler concerned WMD's that were, for physical and chemical reasons,
altogether impossible and inconceivable while the lie against Saddam
Hussein was about WMD's that were quite possible and conceivable, since
his accusers themselves possessed such devices in great abundance.
Secondly, the lie against Adolf Hitler was more than half a century old
and going stronger than ever, while the lie against Saddam Hussein was
only a few months old and not yet very strong. Thirdly, if someone
disputed the accusation against Adolf Hitler he might, like Ernst Zündel,
be sent to prison whereas if someone disputed the accusation against
Saddam Hussein he would, at least currently, be running only slight risks.
Observe how the lie was built up against Saddam Hussein
and you will see exactly how the lie against Adolf Hitler was forged by
the same sort of people and for the same purpose: perpetual war.
