| 
	
     April 4, 2003 
    ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny: Now more than ever! 
    The Toronto Star, also known in the streets as the Red Star,
    has besmirched itself once again with its own poison in an editorial titled
    "Show Zundel the door." You find it below, interspersed with some
    Zundelsite comments, followed by a reply from the Director of Canadian
    Association for Free Expression, Paul Fromm: 
    [START] 
    Apr. 3, 2003. 01:00 AM TORONTO STAR 
    
      Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel is making a mockery of the
      refugee claim process. That's no surprise. 
      What's more disturbing is how Immigration Minister Denis
      Coderre is neglecting to stop the charade. 
      Zundel, a German-born resident of Canada for some 40
      years, is no stranger to notoriety or manipulating the system. 
      He moved to Tennessee in 2001 in the midst of a
      long-running human rights probe, complaining Canada wanted to silence his
      views. Indeed, a human rights tribunal ordered him to remove anti-Semitic
      hate literature from his Web site. He did not. 
     
    (Zundelsite comment: For the Nth time, he couldn't have
    removed a comma if he had wanted to. He does not now, nor has he ever, known
    the password to the Zundelsite! The much-contested website happens to belong
    to me!) 
    
      The United States sent him back Feb. 19 for overstaying a
      visitor's visa. Zundel, whose bids for Canadian citizenship have always
      been rejected, then claimed refugee status. 
      America doesn't want him, nor does Canada. 
     
    [Zundelsite comment: First of all, he was never given a
    reason for the refusal the first time. His second citizenship bid was not
    rejected - Ernst withdrew it after waiting seven years. And for the record:
    He had no problems whatsoever in America. Ask anyone. Unwary American
    bureaucrats were disgracefully used by nefarious forces to act as body
    snatchers.) 
    
      However, Germany does, and has issued a warrant for his
      arrest on charges under its hate laws. He was convicted in absentia in
      1991. 
     
    (Zundelsite comment: As I remember it, he was convicted for
    trying to organize the Leuchter Congress, which should have been good news
    for Jews and Gentiles alike - namely that no one but no one was
    "gassed", since science does not lie, not even for the
    "Nazis". But the arrest warrant that is outstanding now is there
    for a different reason: It is meant as a salutary lesson for having
    exercised free speech - a hard-won right, according to a Zundel Supreme
    Court decision in 1992) 
    
      Yet this week the Immigration and Refugee Board ordered
      Zundel to continue being held in a Niagara Region jail pending his refugee
      claimant hearing. No date has been set, and likely won't be for months. 
      Zundel's case is a black mark on the entire refugee claim
      system, already under justifiable criticism. 
     
    (Zundelsite comment: Words to the wise! ) 
    
      The board has a massive backlog and the largest workload
      in its history. Nearly 53,000 cases were on the books at the end of 2002. 
      Government lawyers say Ottawa is still investigating
      whether Zundel is inadmissible on the grounds of national security. They
      argue he must not be released because he is a public danger who would
      spread white supremacist views. 
      Locking him up is not the answer. Getting rid of him is. 
      Every time he has a hearing, he gains a platform for his
      bottomless well of hatred. Every public appearance is an excuse for his
      smirking, misguided followers to gather. 
      Such nonsense must stop. 
      The Canadian Security Intelligence Service declared Zundel
      a danger fully 10 years ago. 
     
    (Zundelsite comment: Actually, it was eight years ago. But a
    more cogent question is: Did anything dangerous happen in eight years? Was
    Canada in peril? Ever? Is it now? What threadbare nonsense is this!) 
    
      What more evidence does Ottawa need? 
     
    (Zundelsite comment: How about REAL evidence - not
    shrieking, smears and innuendo? ) 
    
      Refugee claimants deserve a fair and expeditious hearing.
      If blindingly obvious cases such as this one can't be dealt with in a
      timely way, it brings Canada's refugee system into question. 
     
    (Zundelsite comment: MORE words to the wise! Hear, hear!) 
    
      How can Coderre justify this needlessly long process? This
      isn't a case of an unknown claimant for whom officials truly do need time
      to investigate properly. 
      Zundel's continued presence here is intolerable. Kick him
      out now. 
     
    [END] 
    __________- 
    Send your contributions to Letters to the Editor via email
    to lettertoed@thestar.ca; via fax
    to 416 869-4322; or by mail to One Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5E 1E6. 
    ===== ===== ===== 
    Reply to this editorial from the Canadian
    Association for Free Expression Box 332, Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3 Ph:
    905-897-7221; FAX: 905-277-3914 
    [START] 
    
      April 3, 2003 
      The Editor, The Toronto Star. 
      Dear Sir: BY FAX 416 869-4322-- For Publication 
      Your editorial "Show Zundel the Door" (Toronto
      Star, April 3, 2003) confuses real abuse of the refugee system with a
      genuine case. 
      A refugee is a person with a well-founded fear of
      persecution on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity or beliefs, provided
      that he is non-violent. Germany has draconian anti-free speech laws that
      are not comparable to anything we have in Canada. Truth is no defence.
      Publisher Ernst Zundel faces five years imprisonment and a heavy fine
      should he be returned to Germany. 
      One may not like his eccentric take on history, but isn't
      tolerance and diversity what Canada is all about? 
      You state: "Government lawyers say Ottawa is still
      investigating whether Zundel is inadmissible on the grounds of national
      security. They argue he must not be released because he is a public danger
      who would spread white supremacist views." 
      In Zundel's case the threat to national security argument
      is completely bogus. After the abuses of the old Security and Intelligence
      Branch of the RCMP, Parliament created CSIS in 1982. To avoid abuse or
      needless snooping, a threat to national security was carefully defined. It
      included espionage, attempts to overthrow the government by violence,
      activities directed by a foreign state or "serious acts of violence
      against persons or property for the purpose of achieving a political,
      religious or ideological objective." 
      Zundel is a pacifist. He has never been convicted of any
      crime, much less a crime of violence, under Canada's Criminal Code. 
      His views may be reprehensible to many. However, the CSIS
      Act makes it clear that non-violent advocacy does not constitute a threat
      to national security. Specifically, a threat to national security
      "does not include lawful advocacy, protest or dissent." 
      Ernst Zundel is a publisher, not a terrorist. Let him
      stay. 
      Paul Fromm Director 
     
    [END] 
      
    
      
        | 
             
          Write to Canada's Immigration Minister and complain
          over the unfair treatment Ernst Zündel has received. 
          Immigration Minister Denis Coderre
          House of Commons 
          Parliament Buildings 
          Ottawa, Ontario 
          K1A 0A6
          Telephone: (613) 995-6108 
          Fax: (613) 995-9755 
          Email: Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca  | 
       
     
      
	 |