Just to remind my readers that David Irving is in his second day of challenging the grossly unfair judgment of Judge Gray in the Irving/Lipstadt trial. One of the entirely unprofessional charges was Judge Gray's statement that the British historian was a "racist" - and that, therefore, Deborah Lipstadt was justified in characterizing him that way.
Now let's see: Here is one Revisionist, Paul Grubach, taking on the meat of the matter:
[START] Grubach again challenges Dr. Lipstadt for racial hypocrisy
Dear Dr. Lipstadt:
On page 209 of his recent THE HOLOCAUST ON TRIAL, D.D. Guttenplan hinted at Deb Lipstadt's racial double standard. He wrote: "...it was hard not to feel queasy listening to Rampton quiz Irving about his attitude to 'intermarriage between the races'--on behalf of a defendant who has written, 'We [Lipstadt and fellow Zionists] know what we fight against: anti-Semitism and assimilation [of Jews with non- Jews], intermarriage [between Jews and non-Jews] and Israel- bashing.'"
Yet, on page 106 (and all throughout the book for that matter) of your DENYING THE HOLOCAUST, you specifically condemn white gentile revisionists who oppose the integration of Europeans with nonwhites. You wrote: "These [revisionist] publications constitute vivid examples of the relationship between Holocaust denial, racist nationalism, and antisemitism."
You then discuss a specific example of "this evil, white racist nationalism," the work of revisionist Richard Harwood. You continue: "Harwood echoed the familiar extremist charge that the Anglo-Saxon world faced the gravest danger in its history: the presence of 'alien races' in its midst. Linking Holocaust denial and the defense of the 'race,' he argued that unless something was done to halt the immigration and assimilation of non-Caucasians, Anglo-Saxons were certain to experience not only 'biological alteration' but the 'destruction' of their European culture and heritage."
So let's get this straight. It is "extremist and evil" for European gentiles to oppose the intermarriage and integration of whites with nonwhites, but it is "right, good and moral" for Jews to oppose the intermarriage and integration of Jews with non-Jews.
Like I said before, Dr. Lipstadt, the expert on political extremism, Laird Wilcox, pointed out that one characteristic of an extremist is that she promotes hypocritical double standards and feels no guilt for so doing. You apparently feel no guilt for openly promoting a racial double standard. That is, it is "wrong and evil" for white gentiles to desire to preserve their European heritage, but it is "right and good" for Jews to want to preserve their heritage.
Years ago, Dr. Michael Shermer--a man who is in your camp-- told me in an email that you are (words to the effect) an intolerant person. (I still have a printout of said email.) He appears correct. You appear to be an intolerant person who has no qualms about promoting racial double standards.
Paul Grubach
[END]
Thought for the Day:
"One man that has a mind and knows it can always beat ten men who haven't and don't."
(George Bernard Shaw)