As my daily ZGram readers know, the Zundelsite has struggled for the last few weeks with what seemed to be inexplicable glitches and vexing problems, which now turn out to have been, in all likelihood, sophisticated sabotage. David Irving experienced similar interference - his website was inaccessible for weeks. So have countless contributors to newsgroups, who complain that their contributions to a cyber discussion either aren't posted or simply disappear shortly after they have been posted.
There is also hanky panky afoot with the working of the various powerful search engines. One cyber fighter wrote: "Something is definitely on. Trying to search for IHR, I still get their homepage all right, but mostly I get a lot of holosite hits. A few months ago when I did a google 'Auschwitz' search, a large number of revisionist links were there to be followed. Now I get a sea of holosites and not a single revisionist one in sight."
And just yesterday I learned that the most important European Revisionist site - www.vho.org - has been attacked with a vicious spam its webmaster is now frantically trying to clean up. We ask anybody with technical expertise to get busy and try to find out just what is going on!
The big Revisionist story is, of course, the newest David Irving/Oxford University Debate controversy. Irving is to take part in a debate about Freedom of Speech on May 10th, and the Holocaust Bullies are becoming apoplectic. The media have been forbidden to cover the event. David the British Bulldog has dug in his heels. We can expect some fireworks. Windbag Rampton, who at first was to be one of Irving's opponent in the debate, has already chickened out. Evidently he could not hack it, since the deck would not have been stacked against Irving, as was true in the courtroom.
The radical Marxist street mob seems to have been mobilized. Police are on the alert. Administrators are wringing their hands. Politicians want the debate canceled. The Bully Lobby is pulling out all stops. "Let's hate! Let's not debate!" seems to be their battle cry.
The second big story is what will happen in Amman where on May 13 (some reports falsely claim May 15) the Jordanian Writers Association is scheduled to meet to finally discuss the Beirut cancellation of the International Revisionist Conference at the Zionist Bully's behest.
Informal reports indicate that this courageous writers' group is determined to fight for their freedom of speech, but the professional thumb screws already applied to key writers are not pleasant. The censorship battle is taking on the familiar form employed against intellectual writers, teachers, professors and journalists for decades in the West - financial hardship, interrogation requests, character assassination, loss of jobs etc.
And speaking of the long arm of The Bully! The Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 2, 2001 reports that the chairman of St. Petersburg University's history department was fired after what they call ". . . conflicts with students and other professors stemming from his anti-Semitism".
Igor Froyanov is the author of several works that deal with the topic of secret conspiracies of Jews and the West set to destroy Russia. Shades of what happened to Faurisson, Deckert, Keegstra, Malcolm Ross, Udo Walendy and many others in the "democratic West"!
Also on May 2, 2001, the New York Times ran a very expensive, full-page "ad", paid for by the American Jewish Committee and headlined "The Big Lie Is Still Alive". This ad incorporated quotes from Arab newpapers which suggested that Arabs are bloodthirsty supporters of Hitler's anti-Jewish policies.
Of course nothing could be further from the truth. My own impression is that Arab intellectuals of all kinds of political persuasions, like practically all of the rest of the world, react to the name "Hitler" with predictable, artificially induced fear and repulsion, without ever fully realizing that this Hitler demonization is one of Zion's most potent weapons.
I'll let you read the following paragraph and leave you to your thoughts. It refers to a new Mel Brooks creation - "The Producers":
"At its heart, Mel Brooks' madcap satiric flick about how to succeed on Broadway by not really trying was just a glorious excuse to create a silly, offensive and hysterically funny Busby-Berkley treatment of the Third Reich. Now Brooks takes the joke one step further, turning the hilarious 1968 movie into 2001's hottest Broadway ticket, replete with genuine Great-White-Way stars, sharp patter, catchy tunes and some of the most irreverent dance numbers ever staged...You can't underestimate the public's taste. And, apparently, America's still a sucker for dancing Nazis."
The rest of this slime can be found at http:// newyork.citysearch.com/profile/11389584
Israeli pianist and conductor Daniel Barenboim is claiming free speech privileges for himself in wanting to stage an opera by Richard Wagner, long decried as Hitler's favorite musician. He is running into stone wall after stone wall.
"I can identify completely with the people who don't want to listen to (Wagner)," Barenboim told Israel Radio. "But I can't identify with the fact that they are trying to stop other people from hearing it."
Aren't Revisionists saying the same about their research and findings?
According to various newscasts, Syria's president, Bashar al- Assad", repeated what he had said before - that "the racism of the Israelis is worse than Nazism". While visiting in Spain, Assad recalled that an Israeli minister had said that Palestinians should be driven out of the territories to ensure the purity of the Jewish people.
"I leave it to you to judge whether this is Nazism," said Assad, presumably raising his eyebrows.
Poland is walking right into another reparations trap. Poland's bishops have agreed to apologize for the 1941 massacre of Jews in northeastern Poland, a spokesman has announced.
The newest claim is that 1,600 Jews were slain in 1941 by the Poles, after the Germans were blamed for the very same crime for something like 5 decades. Why, suddenly, the switch from "Nazi" crime to Polish crime? While the Poles don't have much to fork over by way of currency, they never were punished for their dislike of their Jewish minority - so is it time to settle an old score?
That Holocaust cudgel comes in handy for more than one purpose, obviously. The Zundelsite predicts a grab for land.
According to a May 3, 2001 AP release, homosexual activists want their own monument in the heart of Berlin for what they have suffered in the Third Reich. It is true that the Hitler regime criminalized homosexuality among men, strengthening the legal code in 1935 and condemning thousands for homosexual acts to correctional institutions like concentration camps. There, homosexuals received their own distinctive patch to wear on their concentration camp garb - a pink triangle. It is not true, however, that they were executed en masse for what was considered aberrant sexual behavior. They were removed for the sake of protecting society because the Hitler regime was quite firm in its societal values and mores.
Berlin's Mayor, Eberhard Diepgen, is showing some stamina. He is on record for opposing the creation of a so-called "Memorial Victims' Mile" in the very heart of Germany.
In Canada, there is some faint stirring by the German community - namely its German-Canadian Congress, a hitherto docile, politically inconsequential group. They have come out in support of one Helmut Oberlander, 75, who is to be deported back to Germany for having once belonged to the SS as a 17-year-old teenage interpreter.
A spokesman for the German-Canadian Congress has stated that his group had met with Elinor Caplan, Jewish immigration minister, and other cabinet ministers and urged them to allow Oberlander to remain in Canada. No specific crime could be proven against Oberlander in lengthy legal proceedings, but no matter. The Jewish Lobby is after his hide.
If they succeed, Oberlander will be only the second person to lose his Canadian citizenship and be deported for his Second World War history, after a Dutch-born botanist, Jacob Luitjens, was deported to the Netherlands in 1992 for collaborating with the occupying German army.
And finally, here's really food for thought:
A group of high school students, winners of a patriotic essay contest, visiting Washington, DC, stopped at a national monument , the Jefferson Memorial, last month. So overcome with national pride were these good youngsters, they spontaneously burst into singing the National Anthem.
"We got to almost the very end and we were at the last stanza when the National Park Service asked us to stop," explained one of the girls.
It turns out that, according to a federal regulation, any time a group of 26 people or more gathers at a national monument and attracts an audience, it is considered a "demonstration", which requires a permit.
The name of the essay contest? "What Price Freedom?"
How to subscribe and unsubscribe:
Thank you for subscribing to the Zgrams. Please go to vho.org/mlm to add your name to the list.
If you want to be removed from our list, please go to vho.org/mlm, enter your email, and remove yourself from the list.
Webmaster www.zundelsite.org