Sunday is customarily the day when I try to review and abstract the Revisionist News of the Week. I am replacing it today with something I consider really significant - of importance for Revisionism worldwide, for it makes Revisionism 'salonfähig", to use a fitting German word: a topic to be discussed in polite company, tuxedo and all - and without genuflection.
Hot off the presses, and boasting a readership of some 700,000, Esquire Magazine - a "highbrow slick", as it is known in the vernacular, and read by the intellectual elite in America - ran an extensive feature on Revisionism that is supposedly already on the news stands around the country and overseas. I haven't seen it yet. It runs nine pages long.
How much would the advertising cost have been, had we had to buy that kind of space? Chances are, hundreds of thousands of dollars! IF they had dared to sell us the ad space at all!
And we are getting it for "free" - and why?
Is it because the Holocaust Lobby browbeat and humiliated one of its own by barring John Sack from talking about Jewish crimes against Germans in the US Holocaust museum a few years back? Is this the revenge of John Sack? Is this his "payback" article?
And we should not forget that this breakthrough was ultimately bought by thousands and thousands of "little" people the world over who have with their donations underwritten and supported the key players in the Revisionist struggle - for decades!
These Revisionist pioneers have made a name for themselves and the cause they espouse through grindingly hard work, endless trials and prosecutions, arson, bombs, beatings, weeks of telephone terror and even assassinations. We owe thanks to their dedication through many lonely days and nights. It is Revisionist dedication and responsible advocacy that has made it possible for a Jew like John Sack to broach the wall of censorship.
It's everybody's victory!
There is a "Sneak Preview" of this article already available on the Net, titled "Esquire Magazine Publishes Breakthrough Report on Revisionism".
This preview, originally written by former Associated Press reporter Michael Hoffman II <http://www.hoffman-info.com/> was almost immediately posted Friday, January 5, 2001, on David Irving's website, <http://www.fpp.co.uk/Online/01/01/Esquire1.html> where it sits with a grin and a gleam in its eye.
Michael Hoffman summarizes:
This Esquire article is destined to be a classic. Be sure to get your copy at the newsstand and alert your friends and relatives.
Here are excerpts from John Sack's "Inside the Bunker":
* "The Holocaust deniers say--and they're right-- that one Auschwitz commandant confessed after he was tortured and that the other (Holocaust) reports are full of bias, rumors, exaggerations and other preposterous matters...Despite their take on the Holocaust, they (revisionists) were affable, open-minded, intelligent, intellectual. Their eyes weren't fires of unapproachable certitude and their lips weren't lemon twists of astringent hate. Nazis and neo-Nazis they didn't seem to be. Nor did they seem anti-Semites..."
* "Sixteen ...(revisionist) speakers spoke...and I'd counted six who'd run afoul of the law because of their disbelief in the Holocaust and the death apparatus in Auschwitz. To profess this in anyone's earshot is illegal not just in Germany but in Holland, Belgium, France, Spain, Switzerland, Austria, Poland and Israel, where denying the Holocaust can get you five years, while denying God can get you just one. One speaker, David Irving, had been fined $18,000 for saying aloud in Germany that one of the cyanide chambers at Auschwitz is a replica built by the Poles after the war. A replica it truly is, but truth in these matters is no defense in Germany. Another speaker, a Frenchman, had been fined in France, and another speaker, a German, had been sentenced to fourteen months...Another speaker, an Australian, had come from seven months in a German jail for writing in Australia...that there were no cyanide chambers in Auschwitz..."
* "Americans who don't know if one hundred thousand, two hundred thousand or one million of our own soldiers died...know exactly how many Jews died in WWII. 'Once,' said Michael Berenbaum, the former research director of the US Holocaust memorial Museum, 'the Holocaust was a side story of WWII. Now one thinks of WWII as a background story (to) the Holocaust. Among many ways Jewish leaders accomplished this was to tap out an SOS, an all-points alarm, whenever in any dark corner they spotted a knavish denier. They may have adopted this from Jakob Bohme, a German mystic of Shakespeare's time. Bohme once said, 'Nothing becomes manifest without opposition'...Lest the Holocaust become unmanifest... Jewish leaders constantly point to the opposition, the bogeyman, the bugaboo, the otherwise ineffectual squad of Holocaust deniers. But there's a double edge to Bohme's sword: By opposing, opposing, opposing them in print, on the radio, and on TV, Jewish leaders make the deniers manifest too. The deniers survive because they are being persecuted."
* "I wanted to say something therapeutic (at the revisionist conference), to say something about hate. At the (revisionist) hotel, I'd seen none of it, certainly less than I'd seen when Jews were speaking of Germans. No one had ever said anything remotely like Elie Wiesel, 'Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set aside a zone of hate--healthy, virile hate--for what persists in the Germans,' and no one had said anything like Edgar Bronfman, the president of the World Jewish Congress. A shocked professor told Bronfman once, 'You're teaching a whole generation to hate thousands of Germans,' and Bronfman replied, 'No, I'm teaching a whole generation to hate MILLIONS of Germans."
In this Esquire article, the American reading public with some discerning taste has just been shown, by a Jew writing of a Jew, the true-blue Jewish agenda.