I now bring you Part II of the Lady Birdwood essay:
(M)any people will recollect seeing photographs of a medical kidney dish with white lumps in it which were described as "human soap". This was an official exhibit at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials designed to prove that the Nazis melted down the corpses of their Jewish victims to make soap. Since then it has been admitted, even by Jewish 'Holocaust' study centres, that no such "human soap" ever existed and that this ludicrous Soviet exhibit (the authenticity of which went unchallenged by any of the Allied judges and prosecutors) was a propaganda hoax.
Much the same process happened after the First World War when horror stories about "The Kaiser's Tinned Human Flesh Factory" and "German troops riding into Belgium with babies impaled on their lances", etc., were disproved, formally withdrawn and apologised for by the British Government in 1925!
No such apology would seem to be in prospect in respect of the Second World War 'Holocaust' horror stories, even though 45 years have elapsed, because international Jewry is deriving such incredible benefits, political and financial, from instilling into the Gentile peoples of the world a massive guilt complex about the 'Holocaust'. Jewry is well able to cow and brainwash large sections of the world's population because, through their control of the world banking system, they have been able to achieve a virtual monopoly control of the international mass media: press, television, films, book publishing, theatre, etc. They use that media monopoly relentlessly to keep alive the 'Holocaust' legend in the minds of gullible brainwashed Gentiles, and, thereby, licence themselves to perpetrate all manner of crimes, from squalid financial frauds [e.g. the Guinness scandal in Britain], to treason and subversion [e.g. the Pollard spy scandal in America], to international terrorism and genocidal warfare [e.g. the Israeli invasion of the Lebanon and occupation of the West Bank].
It is because Jewry needs to have the propaganda weapon of the 'Holocaust' legend that it not only keeps on pumping out propaganda extravaganzas on the television but also bullies the politicians of nations throughout the world to mount "War Crimes Trials" against elderly men who served with the German forces during the last war, and who since the war have tried to build new lives for themselves in Britain, the USA, Canada, Australia, etc. Britain's legal system has recently [April 1991] been corrupted by the House of Commons (with stout resistance from the House of Lords) solely as a result of Jewish pressure to legislate retrospectively so that show-trials can be mounted which would serve as a focus for the Jewish owned media to pump out yet more propaganda lies.
But the Jews do not have everything entirely their own way. Apart from the very brave resistance to the Jewish 'War Crimes Trials' lobby by many members of the House of Lords, there has also been the recent appearance of an item of research entitled The Leuchter Report which has severely rattled the Jewish 'Holocaust' industry.
About six years ago Jewish lobbyists in Canada persuaded the authorities to prosecute a German-Canadian, Ernst Zuendel, for distributing the international best-seller Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood. Charges were laid against Zuendel under the terms of a law which prohibits "Spreading False Rumours".
(Zundelsite comment: The correct phrase is "Spreading false news.") (...)
Zuendel was convicted at the first trial - and on Appeal, the trial judge was held to be so biased against the Defendant that a new trial was ordered.
The key Defence witness at the second trial was Fred Leuchter, head of the American engineering firm Fred Leuchter Associates. This firm has America's-and therefore probably the world's-leading specialists in the design, construction and maintenance of execution gas chambers. Until recently, when American Jewish lobbyists intervened to try to destroy the firm, Fred Leuchter Associates had contracts of many years' standing with several States of the United States which still execute criminals convicted of capital crimes, in gas chambers. Mr. Leuchter and his firm have no political background or involvements whatsoever.
Prior to Zuendel's second trial, Leuchter and a team of his firm's employees went to various of the so-called "Death Camps"-Auschwitz, Treblinka, etc., in order to examine the "gas chambers" and crematoria facilities to see if they were capable of executing and disposing of the remains of millions of people on the kind of factory 'mass-production' basis claimed by the 'Holocaust' propagandists.
MASS EXTERMINATION BY GAS CHAMBERS-HOW THE JEWS SAY IT WAS DONE
At this point it might be well to refresh our memories of what the promoters of the 'Holocaust' legend claim, for it is only when we bear in mind the essential details of their account that we can appreciate the enormous importance of Leuchter's evidence:
They ***claim*** (emphasis added) that many hundreds of Jews [and others-but mostly Jews] were crammed naked into gas chambers. Once inside and the door shut, a quantity of Zyklon B [chalk pellets containing hydrocyanic acid which give off lethal cyanide gas when exposed to the air] was tipped inside through a roof hatch. After an hour or so the door of the gas chamber would be opened and the bodies dragged out. The mouths of the corpses were immediately searched for gold fillings and extractions performed. Other orifices were also searched for hidden valuables. This work was carried out by camp inmates under the immediate supervision of their SS guards. Neither the inmates nor the SS men wore any breathing apparatus or any other kind of protective clothing; indeed, the guards often callously smoked and ate during the gruesome process. Thereafter, the corpses would be sent to the crematoria where they would be reduced to ashes in conventional coke-fired cremation ovens. On days that the ovens were too busy to cope with the workload, pits would be dug, corpses thrown in and incinerated. This process continued 24-hours a day for a period of years. In the case of Birkenau, in the Auschwitz complex of camps, this 'mass production' method was supposed to have sustained an extermination/incineration rate of 1,000 an hour-24,000 a day.
Even before we turn to the detail of Leuchter's evidence to the Canadian Court, the preposterous impudence of the Jewish 'Holocaust' story must be self-evident to those who can perform a little simple arithmetic: If Birkenau-Auschwitz exterminated 1,000 Jews an hour for a year that would result in 8,760,000 Jewish dead. [1,000 x 24 x 365]. As that "death factory" was supposed to be functional for about four years, we arrive at a figure of 35,040,000! Suppose we allow for just a little Levantine exaggeration, and cut the projected Birkenau-Auschwitz figure by 75%, that still leaves a total of 8,760,000. That number is nearly half the claimed Jewish population of the entire world in 1938! And let us not forget that gas chambers at other "Death Camps"-Treblinka, Chelmno, Sobibor, etc., were also supposed to have accounted for "millions" of Jews.
WHAT FRED LEUCHTER'S EVIDENCE REVEALED
Fred Leuchter explained to the Court that the technology of execution gas chambers employing cyanide gas had been fully developed in the United States by the early 1920s. Literature concerning this technology circulated the globe thereafter and all of the relevant technical information would have been available to the Germans. In particular, they would have been aware:
A. That cyanide gas is so dangerous that if it is not to injure or kill those operating the gas chamber as well as the condemned person, the chamber must be specially constructed to be airtight and, specifically, the entry door must be gasketted.
B. Cyanide gas is persistent, that is, it clings in corners and holes-and in hair, in body folds and orifices for many hours after it has been released. Hence, after the condemned person has died it is necessary to have a ventilation system which can expel as much of the gas as possible from the chamber to a height where the gas can diffuse in the air without posing any danger to persons in the vicinity. In the interests of safety, the body should be left in the ventilated chamber for 24 hours before the gasketted door is opened. Only staff wearing breathing apparatus and protective clothing should be in the room in which the gas chamber is situated when the door is opened. Thereafter, staff should hose down the body and the entire chamber to disperse the final, potentially fatal, traces of the gas.
C. Cyanide gas had been used by the German and French armies in WW1 to delouse buildings and clothing. Both armies would post armed guards around-but a good distance away from-the building being used for this purpose After 24 hours troops wearing breathing apparatus would open the doors and windows of the building, but retreat to a safe distance for a ventilation period of not less than 24 hours. Thereafter clothing, blankets, carpets, etc., from the building would be put on lines and beaten by personnel wearing breathing apparatus to dispel the final traces of the gas. Cyanide gas is potentially explosive and personnel connected with operations involving it were routinely searched for matches and lighters before commencing any delousing operation.
Leuchter told the Court that he and his team of experts had visited Birkenau-Auschwitz and other alleged "Death Camps" in Poland and had seen the buildings which are described as having been "gas chambers"; had taken samples from the walls of rooms said to have been "gas chambers" for later forensic analysis in the United States; had inspected the crematoria facilities and had inspected other buildings in-and the land surrounding-the camps. He reported as follows:
1. None of the rooms said to have been "gas chambers" had gasketted doors or were in any other aspect of airtight construction. Had cyanide gas been released in any of the alleged "gas chambers" the camp staff would themselves quickly have fallen victim to it. Indeed, at Auschwitz the "gas chamber" was directly adjacent to the SS hospital. A channel ran between the two buildings along which the gas would have accumulated, causing fatalities among the hospital patients, either by gassing or an explosion.
2. The rooms described as "gas chambers" were far too small to accommodate the hundreds of persons who were supposed to have been packed into them. Had it been possible to cram the rooms as claimed, the occupants would have died of asphyxiation, even though the doors were not gasketted, long before cyanide gas could have permeated the remaining space in the room not taken up by people. Had people been crammed in the rooms in the numbers claimed, and had the rooms been filled with cyanide gas, then the job of extracting the corpses without preliminary intensive ventilation would have led to the deaths of those performing the work-and those supervising it-if they wore no breathing apparatus, especially if searches of the corpses' orifices were conducted immediately on removal.
4. The crematoria at all camp sites were of the conventional type, fired by coke. Some cremation chambers (retorts) could accommodate two corpses, most only one. Such retorts could only reduce cadavers to a few bones (which thereafter would have to be pulverised) after a period of hours. None of the "extermination" sites had anything like the number of crematoria retorts capable of reducing to ashes the huge number of corpses which were allegedly being produced by the "gas chambers". Each of the camps examined had a necessary number of crematoria retorts in relationship to the camps' populations and the likely death rate from all of the usual natural causes (not including severe epidemics like typhus).
5. Any attempt to burn corpses in deep pits would be quite futile as all of the camps examined were built on marshland with a water table about 18 inches below the surface. Any hole deeper than that would quickly become a pond. Corpses cannot be burned under water, even with the assistance of petrol.
6. Leuchter's team had not only taken samples from the walls of alleged "gas chambers" at the camps visited, but also samples from rooms where all agree that clothes had been subjected to cyanide gas for delousing purposes. These samples bad been given to a reputable firm of forensic scientists who regularly undertake work for American Courts. They were not told where the samples had come from nor the reason for the examination. They were merely asked to report on the content of cyanide in the various samples. The forensic scientists' report, in the form of a sworn affidavit, indicated that the content of cyanide in the samples which came from the walls of rooms used to delouse clothes was extremely high, but the samples taken from rooms where supposedly millions of people over a period of years had been gassed to death, showed almost no cyanide content whatsoever.
The very small amount of cyanide to register from the samples taken from the walls of the alleged "gas chambers" was due to the universally acknowledged fact that those rooms, along with all other rooms in these camps, were periodically deloused by means of cyanide gas in an attempt (eventually in vain, as we have discussed earlier) to protect the inmates from outbreaks of typhus.
ANNE FRANK'S STORY
As a footnote to the twin subjects of the reputation of Auschwitz as an "Extermination Camp" and the fatalities caused by typhus, we might observe that the tragic Anne Frank of Anne Frank's Diary fame was sent to Auschwitz after she and her family were captured by the Germans in Holland. If the 'Holocaust' horror story accounts of Auschwitz are to be believed, Anne would have been an early candidate for the "gas chamber" as she was too young and not strong enough to perform hard physical work. Yet even as publisher's postscripts to 'her' book, statements made by her, by her father after the war (another member of the legion of 'Survivors'), and statements made by the 'Anne Frank Foundation' readily concede, Anne did not get gassed at Auschwitz. She did not even die at Auschwitz.
For some reason, the cruel Third Reich, having built an "Extermination Camp" for just such hapless victims as she, and having sent her there at some expense by train, then added to it by keeping her alive and healthy and then, unaccountably, went to the yet further expense of sending her on another train journey, this time to Germany (to Belsen, in fact) where, near the end of the war she, along with so many of her fellow inmates, contracted typhus and died, with not a gas chamber in sight.
(There were no "gas chambers" in Belsen, as even Jewish propagandists admit nowadays.)
Anne's end was tragic, but we think the events which immediately preceded it provide some additional perspectives by which we can judge the worth of 'Holocaust' fable.
[We think it right to state at this stage that the information which we have given above concerning the evidence supplied given by Fred Leuchter to the second trial of Ernst Zuendel in Canada, constitutes only a very abbreviated digest of the facts which he put on record under oath. However, we believe we have given sufficient of his evidence to indicate, when it is compared with the horror stories highlighted in Jewish propaganda, that the fundamental proposition of the 'Holocaust' legend: that the German Nazis set about the "systematic extermination" of the Jewish race on a mass production basis by means of "gas chambers" in "Death Camps" such as Auschwitz, has no foundation in fact and is, on the contrary, a propaganda invention designed morally to intimidate Gentiles and thus provide the Jews with a carte blanche to behave as the Lords of the Earth which they believe that they are-or are destined by their God to become. (...)
Leuchter's revelations caused high anxiety among Jewish 'Holocaust' propagandists, though they were quick to use their power to ensure that nowhere in the world did the mass media report any aspect of his evidence and have now set about trying to destroy his company and his livelihood. But despite their evil and subversive hounding of this honest and brave man the truth about the 'Holocaust' lie is leaking out.
It is essential that it be exposed, for it is the greatest single propaganda weapon in Jewry's arsenal.
(For complete details, see Barbara Kulaszka's masterful book on the 1988 Zundel trial, listing all the pertinent testimony, including that of Fred Leuchter.
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrdtoc.html =====
The material above was found at
http://www2.prestel.co.uk/littleton/re4_longest_hatred.htm and "zgrammed" with permission.
=====
Thought for the Day:
"There is no such thing as an independent Press in America, unless it is in the country towns.. You know it, and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to express an honest opinion. If you express an honest opinion, you know beforehand it would never appear in print. I am paid $150 a week for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for doing similar things. If I should permit honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my newspaper, like Othello, before twenty-four hours, my occupation would be gone. The business of the New York journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon; to sell his race and his country for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are intellectual prostitutes."
(- John Swinton, Editor of the New York Tribune, to the New York Press Association, on February, 26th, 1936)