The Holocaust claims another victim: One more lesson to be learned!
Joel Hayward of New Zealand, by his own admission partially Jewish, wrote a master's thesis in the early '80s titled "The Fate of the Jews in German Hands: An Historical Enquiry into the Development and Significance of Holocaust Revisionism." For this study, he was able to get access to German research facilities and see documents not easily available to gentile revisionist scholars, who are usually barred - as Dr. Faurisson has been barred - from the I.C. of the Red Cross-administered central file repository of all German concentration camps in Arolson, Germany, and as David Irving has been barred by the Bundesarchive, the German Federal Archives, in Koblenz.
While preparing for his master's thesis, Joel Hayward contacted the world's leading revisionist scholars. He got their enthusiastic cooperation. Mark Weber of the IHR worked closely with Hayward, supplying him with information and documentation from the IHR's library and files. David Irving made himself and his considerable knowledge available. Dr. Robert Faurisson cooperated and gave the young man the benefits of his years of untiring research. Ernst Zundel was contacted, and he supplied documentation, trial transcripts of the proceedings in Toronto and other peripheral items like copies of newspaper stories, alleged eye witness accounts etc.
To his credit, Hayward apparently wrote a fairly balanced thesis - the gist of it being, as Dr. Faurisson had predicted to Hayward, that Revisionists were right on the money in their claims, that the numbers and eye witness accounts were exaggerated - but that Revisionists who were on record with these claims were heartless because they did not sufficiently take into consideration in their work and publications the hurt feelings of the Holocaust survivors.
At the beginning of his career, Joel Hayward was a rising star in New Zealand academic circles. He wrote a book on Germany's Luftwaffe in World War II which sold in mainstream bookstores. All seemed well. A promising career as a professor lay ahead of him.
Attempts to publish his master's thesis in bookform, however, were usually stymied by non-cooperation, and as the years went by, the thesis went stale, was overtaken by revisionist milestones such as the Leuchter Report, the Lüftl Report, the Polish authorities' own report on the traces of Zyklon B in the hair of inmates etc. Then came the German chemist Germar Rudolf's report, which proved the final nail in the coffin of the Auschwitz Lie. Joel Hayward went after his daily chores as an academic, relatively unnoticed by the outside world, his master's thesis gathering dust on the shelves of Canterbury University.
Then things began to unravel!
Hayward apparently sent a copy of his thesis to Dr. Fredrick Toben, a German Australian, who was then before a Human Rights Tribunal for politically incorrect postings on his revisionist website. Through a chain of events, the Hayward thesis became known, and all hell broke loose for Joel Hayward! Soon he was at the center of a controversy - the kind that is experienced ever more wherever Jewish sensibilities are at stake.
Hayward felt compelled to write a letter to the New Zealand Jewish community. This letter was published in the New Zealand Jewish Chronicle, along with a story about the controversial thesis.
Thereupon the New Zealand Jewish Council contacted the University of Canterbury and asked that Hayward be stripped of his master's degree - much in the same way a generation earlier Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, a respected German judge, had lost his doctorate from Tübingen University, along with a chunk of his pension.
Similar grief had been inflicted upon Henry Rocques, who was likewise stripped of his doctorate by the French Minister of Education in the 1980s in France for his work on the "Confessions of Kurt Gerstein" - the mentally imbalanced SS-Officer who left several wildly contradictory jail house confessions as his legacy before he supposedly committed suicide in a jail in Allied captivity in Rastatt, Germany.
Joel Hayward was in a quandary, but not for long. He apologized. He condemned his own findings. He wrote a groveling addendum to his thesis, to be read side by side with it. Rather than defending his courageous master's thesis, he must have thought he could find respite by abjectly groveling before his tormentors - not realizing that these people show no mercy to their targeted enemies.
His apology and retraction did not satisfy his tormentors! The matter is before a judge. He may well lose his title.
We live in an amazing world. The fact that Hayward was of Jewish background did not protect him from these hyenas. David Cole, who was a Jewish Revisionist and did sterling work, found no protection in being Jewish - in fact, the Holocaust Promoters were far more vicious to him than they have been to Gentiles who have blown the whistle on them.
David Irving - well-known, articulate, author of 34 books on historical topics, also crossed the rubicon - and "Joined the legion of the damned" as soon as he questioned the existence of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz after reading the Leuchter Report.
He, too, tried to save himself by making compromises, by accepting the notion that ". . . there might have been" experimental gassings, that "gas vans" might have been used - it did not help him with the media, much less the judge! His enemies and tormentors merely gloated about his admissions!
Had Hayward stood his ground and defended his master's thesis, he would possibly be stripped of his doctorate - but with his honor and integrity intact. Now he stands to lose it just the same - looking dishonest and incompetent to boot.
The same holds true for David Irving. The heated, shrill condemnations heaped upon this capable writer and historian by the judge and the media would have been no worse - in fact, could have been no worse! - than if he had appeared in court sporting a Hitler mustache and wearing soldiers' boots!
The lessons of the Irving and Hayward cases are clear. There is no compromising with this enemy! This is a fight to the finish - for our enemies have everything to lose!
They have gained all their status, wealth and influence by rising to the top on the strength of Holocaust victimhood propaganda. They will hurl these lightning bolts of condemnation at anyone questioning any of their "get rich quick" "grab power for ourselves" schemes - whether their critics are right or wrong. In Palestine, they label anyone in their path as "terrorist". In Canada, the slurs are "Neo-Nazi" and "Racist". Here in America, you will become an "extremist", a Ku Klux Klanner, an "Aryan Nations nut" or, heaven help your soul, a "Holocaust Denier."
This has been their most effective modus operandi. Professor Kevin MacDonald calls these "survival mechanisms" of these people.
President Kennedy's father was called an "Anti-Semite" because he reported truthfully to Washington why war came in 1939-41. He was relieved of his job.
George Bush was called a "Nazi" because he refused to sign a $US 10 billion loan guarantee. He was defeated.
Pat Buchanan is now a "Nazi" and an outcast in the wall-to-wall politically correct media brew because he had the courage to question some of the disastrous policies of Roosevelt.
This terror will go on as long as it brings the desired results - abject groveling and apologies and paying billions to the tormentors. All these are meant to isolate, economically cripple and socially ostracize their opponents.
Information - and only information - about these people's past behavior, present tactics and future goals will lead to liberation.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"And, what about guys like Rush Limbaugh, Tony Snow, George Will, etc, who run around calling people "conspiracy kooks" ? Are we kooks - or are they asses ?"
(Letter to the Zundelsite)