A ZGram reader wrote in response to yesterday's missive regarding Lothrop Stoddard's treatment of Germany in its first winter of war:
There is another factor here. We don't know what Stoddard knew about events in the Soviet Union other than what was published in the NYT. Everyone should read "Winter in Moscow" by Malcom Muggeridge who tells how corrupt and cruel the Soviet system was.
He also mentions Jews in several places. He also tells of Walter Duranty, NYT correspondent in Moscow who is totally corrupt, a pimp for Stalin.
If one also reads "The Black Book of Communism", s/he discovers that reports on the barbarism in the Soviet Union were published in Berlin in 1922. One of the reasons for NATIONAL Socialism was to counter International Socialism/Bolshevism/Communism.
Those who have never run a political campaign before have no idea of the constraints placed on the campaigner. The primary competition for the National Socialists were the Communists, controlled from Moscow, and only by understanding their tactics and appeal could someone oppose them politically.
One had to have a better program while appealing to the patriotism of the masses and at the same time supporting the productive industries of the country- big business. I would have supported the National Socialists under the circumstances rather than the Communists.
Understanding the true nature of the communist apparat and then acting forcefully (ruthlessly) to counter them was the only alternative. Anything else meant surrender.
We have yet to discover the reports from German diplomats on the activities of Jewry in Britain and the US who were trying to get the goyim to save their co-ethnic's bacon on Germany and Europe. In the spring of 42, Jews from all over the world had a big conference at the Biltmore Hotel to formulate their plans.
I just heard from another revisionist who discovered that Meyer Lansky, the Jewish crook, was encouraged to use violence against the German American groups who opposed US entry into the war. Recall, Lansky retired to Israel later in his career.
The important thing about the Stoddard book is that it was written about a Germany at war by an author who had not seen the Soviet hoodlum empire.
I can only second that. Let us remember General Degrelle's words:
"One day it will not be so easy to forget that Communism was the enemy against whom the Germans fought."
In discussing the Stoddard book with Ernst, we both agreed that a partial truth is better than no truth at all. Ernst mentioned the John Sack book which disturbed and upset him greatly because Sack describes the Jewish-run concentration camps for Germans after the war, and the horrendous tortures and killings that went on.
Ernst's point is that had it not been for Sack, this story would not have been known, even though he resents the slant that Sack takes - here paraphrased: "Whatever the Jews did to the Germans was fully justified - the 'Nazis' did a hundred times worse in places like Auschwitz..." In other words, the Germans had it coming! Yet who will say: "The Jews in Auschwitz had it coming..."?
As we unearth more and more of suppressed history, we must piece together the true picture from many sometimes slanted and often incomplete pieces provided by writers like Lothrop Stoddard, John Sack, James Bacque and others.
From that perspective, the writer above has a very strong point. I have talked to many people who experienced World War II "from the inside" - and the argument always comes up that the war was in response to the horrendous threat Communism posed for Germany and all of Western Europe. That war was a crusade against Communism - in which Germany and its valiant allies sacrificed the flower of their manhood, and millions lost their lives!
That Europe wasn't overrun by the Red hordes even the 1920s was largely due to German volunteers called Freikorps - and then to Hitler's and his men's courage and dedication in a struggle in which hundreds were killed and 40,000 SA-men were seriously wounded long before war broke out.
Where would America be, had the Communists taken over Europe? Where would all the smug, Hitler-bashing goyim be today - had it not been for Hitler?
When will the people of the Western world come to realize that Hitler-bashing is a weapon of war - the most potent weapon in the arsenal of our enemies?
What will it take to wrestle that weapon out of the Big H Lobby's hands?
Ingrid
=====
Thought for the Day:
"While watching 'Face the Nation' this morning, I thought of you when Sam Donaldson questioned Jerry Falwell about his claiming that the Holocaust was a hoax. Jerry weaseled out, though, by claiming that he said that some people thought it a 'Hoax', but that he couldn't verify it. Anyway, I thought that if you had missed it, you would be interested in hearing that the word is being spread in unusual ways!"
(Letter to the Zundelsite)