As I have written in previous ZGrams, German-born and -educated Germar Rudolf is today a political fugitive, thanks to the disgraceful persecution of the Holocaust Lobby. He is also widely known and admired as one of the finest European scholars in his field - and definitely one of the most meticulous hard-science Revisionist activist. His work is verifiable, repeatable, exact - and subject to the laws of science, not the shifting laws of men.
The Lobby fears Rudolf as the devil fears the crucifix, and the stepped-up Rudolf persecution via an updated international arrest warrant is widely recognized in the nationalist field for exactly what it is - a shabby attempt to neutralize a very knowledgeable, articulate, properly trained and accredited chemical expert - a man who is dangerous to the Lobby's house of cards in the so-called Auschwitz "gas chamber" matter.
Germar Rudolf's whereabouts are not known to any one of us, and so it shall remain. However, thanks to the Internet, his very fine mind is still present everywhere, and the Leuchter/Rudolf spirit is spooking our enemies.
Below are the first few paragraphs of what I believe is a very recent report prepared for the Irving trial in London and placed within the last few hours on the Internet. (See link below) I have left the annotated markers in place to give you a feel for the exceptional work of this scholarly young man.
Critique of Chemical Claims Made by Robert Jan Van Pelt
In the case of
David John Cawdell Irving, Plaintiff
against
(1) Penguin Books Limited, First Defendant
(2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, Second Defendant
By Diplom-Chemiker Germar Rudolf, January 1999
Personal Background
My name is Germar Rudolf.[1] I studied Chemistry at the Universities of Bonn and Stuttgart between 1983 and 1993. I received my Diploma in Chemistry in 1989 at Bonn University. Between 1990 and 1993 I had a scholarship of the Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State Research in Stuttgart in order to prepare a PhD thesis in the field of solid state Chemistry/Crystallography.
Since 1990 I am conducting research in my spare time to verify the so-called "Leuchter Report",[2] which eventually led to the preparation of an expert report[3] about chemical and technical details of the so-called 'gas chambers' of Auschwitz.[4] The distribution of one version of this report eventually led to a criminal court case in Germany against me for "inciting hatred" and "stirring up the people". I was eventually sentenced to 14 months imprisonment because of comments that were added to my report without my knowledge.[5] In fact, in the U.S.A. and in Great Britain, such a case would have never reached a law court, as these countries grant proper freedom of speech.
Subsequently, the University of Stuttgart refused to appoint a date for my final exam to receive my PhD, referring to art. 4 of the German Law For Carrying Academic Degrees (Gesetz zur Führung akademischer Grade), which was introduced 1939 by Adolf Hitler and which allows to withhold or withdraw academic titles in case the defendant doesn't show sufficient "academic dignity". According to the University of Stuttgart, the fact that I was found guilty by a German court of a major crime damaging my academic dignity, they had the right and duty to withhold the PhD-title from me.
Since 1991 I was involved in the publication of two anthologies critically reviewing the established version of the so-called 'Holocaust', which were published in 1994 and 1995, respectively, with me as the editor.[6] They, too, led to criminal investigations and in one case[7] to a trial in Germany. Though two well renowned German historians[8] stated during this trial that the "accused" book matches scientific standards and should be protected by freedom of speech and freedom of research, the Tübingen District Court ordered all copies available to the authorities to be burned, and the publisher, the editor, some of the authors, many book retailers who sold the book and customers who bought more than one copy of it to be punished with more or less heavy fines and prison terms.[9]
As a result of the oppressive German legal system, my tenancy agreements were cancelled twice between 1993 and 1996, and my employments ended early either because of pressure put onto my employer or because I had to flee the country in order to avoid being imprisoned for many years. As a consequence I had no choice but to make the critical revision of contemporary history my profession, since my career as an ordinary academic chemist was destroyed by the German authorities. Since 1996 I am publishing a quarterly German language journal mainly focussing on topics that are being suppressed by the mainstream media, be they popular or scholarly.[10] 'Holocaust revisionism' is one of the most important topics within it, as there is no topic where legal and social repression is harder, and since it is my firm believe that exactly there, where the powers that are want to suppress critical voices, they have to be raised.
I think that my education in solid state chemistry combined with my now 10 years lasting research and thorough discussing especially of the chemical parts of the "Leuchter Report" have made me one of the foremost expert in this field worldwide. In contrary to that I cannot see which qualifications Prof. Robert Jan van Pelt has that could make him an expert in judging any of the topics addressed by Leuchter, especially when it comes to chemistry.
The Leuchter Report
The Leuchter Report is now 11 years old. It was a pioneering work, because it was the first time that the 'gas chambers' of Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek were investigated forensically without the influence of any totalitarian regime. It was prepared by the author in a very short period of time, in which he didn't have enough time to collect all the information about the matter that is available now. Therefore it is understandable that it has many shortcomings, which I shall not address here.
Germar Rudolf then goes on with a highly technical report, which is on-line at http://www.vho.org/GB/Contributions/RudolfOnVanPelt.html
We are proud of you, Germar Rudolf, and we thank you for preparing this report, which will assist David Irving in refuting paper (and paper-thin) lies with hard, scientific facts.
Ingrid
=====
Thought for the Day:
"Their gas chambers are their only weapon. Take down their weapon.
"Attack at the heart and mop up the stragglers later.
"There is no valid target outside of their gas chambers. When they are gone there are only stragglers.
"Physical evidence of gas chambers or nothing - not even a Hitler Order can be a substitute.
"In the old days - if one could not reach out and touch one's god - it would be a loss of faith.
"We must insist they reach out and touch their gas chambers - and in failing to do so, face reality."
(Cyber activist Matt Giwer corresponding with Irving Watchers)