After several interruptions, finally we get to the conclusion of the Myatt article I started sending into cyber space during the last millennium. Reads funny, doesn't it?
What's on my mind and in my heart? The concept "Lebensraum!" Outside my window I see the most spectacularly sunny Southern California morning, and my heart rejoices at the thought that there are 140 million Germans and German-descendants in the world - and that is only the beginning! Imagine - having a brand new millennium in front of you! How lucky can we get?
Here's Myatt, one more time:
What modern historians and academics have done, almost without exception, is to tell, re-tell and in some cases create an official version of events for the period 1919-1945 - with any research or work which contradicts this official version discouraged, disallowed, derided, forbidden or destroyed. Furthermore, because of the loss or destruction of many documents, the documentary evidence - which historians often rely on - has been tampered with, so that those pursuing such evidence generally find only what the anti-NS authorities want them to find.
Such has been the official state-sponsored pressure on students of history and on their teachers to accept this official version, that no such thing as free enquiry, unbiased research, academic freedom or even historical truth has existed. This pressure has increased, rather than lessened, with the passing of the years until any student or teacher in any academic institute who dares in any way to be at all critical of this official version of history soon discovers the reality of suppression and repression which exists.
Students have been expelled, teachers retired or dismissed. Students and teachers have been physically attacked, with many forced to recant their views in order to continue with their studies, their work or their careers.
In most instances, the authors of such published works which deal with the period in question are rather like professional journalists - content to tell a story, and content to use whatever material they can, truthful or not, which supports their underlying argument, their thesis, their political views, or which enhances their own career and their own academic standing. They are generally as untruthful, as biased and as unscrupulous as such journalists.
One anticipated new development in this modern saga of unreliable historians is the fabrication, using modern technology, of documents and evidence in support of the Holocaust, and in support of the official version of recent history. There already has been the miraculous discovery of original plans for concentration camps, and gas chambers in hitherto secret Russian archives.
In fact, the fall of Communism in the former Soviet Union gives forgers of Holocaust documents an ideal opportunity. Many such documents can suddenly be discovered, then "authenticated". We can expect many such fabulous finds over the next few years - perhaps even documents allegedly signed by Adolf Hitler and Himmler which order the extermination of the Jews. Perhaps even secret memoirs. Or maybe rare archive film of "gas chambers" in operation. The possibilities are endless. Already teams of Israeli agents and historians are rummaging through the archives of the former Soviet Union and former East Germany. With modern computer and other technology, it is not hard to fabricate documents and give them the appropriate vintage and authentic appearance. Without doubt, many new documents will suddenly be found, as some original documents will secretly and silently disappear.
Either the Holocaust occurred in the manner described by official historians - or it did not. If it did not, then the veracity of such historians is questionable, and their evidence false.
An unbiased knowledge and understanding of National Socialism, together with a reasonable and reasoned examination of recent history, the Holocaust story, and the events surrounding this story - including the modern events relating to such things as making Holocaust denial a crime - can lead to only one conclusion. This is that such a story - alleging mass exterminations - is unreasonable and unlikely.
There IS evidence of the total war conducted against National Socialist Germany. There is the evidence of how biased the victors of this war were toward National Socialism itself. There is their capture and removal of documents and archives. There is the refusal to allow National Socialists to defend National Socialism and Adolf Hitler, with the continuing suppression of National Socialism and the continuing persecution, imprisonment and killing of National Socialists.
There is the fact that National Socialism is only and always portrayed - in schools, colleges and universities, and in books - by enemies, with no free discussion allowed, and no real dissent about this official portrayal allowed. There is the evidence of the vested interest of Israel, and other nations, in upholding the official version of history which has been created. There is the evidence of the torture used to extract confessions from German National Socialists while in Allied custody after the war; there is the evidence of the biased and unjust nature of the Nuremberg Trials; there is the evidence of how those National Socialists, charged with exterminating Jews, who refused to confess and who steadfastly pleaded their innocence, suddenly died while in Allied custody after the war.
All this - and much more - is highly indicative. Add to such circumstantial evidence the specific scientific evidence, and the known historical evidence (for forged documents, disappearing documents and so on) and the case against the Holocaust story is convincing to anyone possessed of the faculty of reason.
This article, in whole or in part and with or without the name of the author, may be re-printed, copied, re-produced, re-published, distributed and translated without the prior written permission of its author.
Footnotes
1.See, for example, Butz : The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Also *Journal of Historical Review* (California, USA) Vol. I, # 2.
2. A further example of how documents have been tampered with is given by John Ball in his Air-Photo Evidence and his *The Ball Report*.
3. The evidence for such things as these is outlined in Chapter III of Vindex - The Destiny of the West.
For further specific scientific and historical evidence, see, for example, the following. Butz: Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Michael A. Hoffman: *The Great Holocaust Trial*. Journal of Historical Review, Vol. I, #1; Vol. I, #2; Vol. 2, # 3. John Cobden: *Dachau - Reality and Myth in History*. See also Robert Lenski: *Holocaust on Trial - The Case of Ernst Zundel*.
<end>
=====
Thought for the Day:
"And I thought you might mention the anti-German elements of the (Y2K) coverage. I saw a few seconds of the Berlin festivities only to be switched to Rome and Paris. When they went to Paris, they noted what a tough time the French have had this century, basically because they were occupied by the Germans. Next it was on to London. In London, the fireworks reminded the commentators of the Blitz and how the Germans attacked the British. Even in New York, it was noted that it was the largest crowd gathering since the end of the Second World War.
"I noted during the brief Berlin coverage that there was no mention of the destruction by Allied bombers or mass rapes by Soviet troops."
(Letter to the Zundelsite)
Back to Table of Contents of the Jan. 2000 ZGrams