Germar Rudolf has replied to the journalistically unconscionable London Telegraph smear, and the situation is pretty much as I surmised in yesterday's ZGram.
The Zionist oligarchy of Britain desperately needs a "Holocaust law", and thus they went and found themselves some media whores who were willing to do what hookers are willing to do: oblige the customer.
I pointed out already yesterday: Germar Rudolf might not be the kind of "victim" they desire. Here is a young and handsome man of intellectual force and strong integrity - the kind of German spirit that we used to know when right was still right and wrong was still wrong. If he is being victimized in major ways, the universities of the entire globe may well become magnificently fertile fields for what he has to say.
Below is Germar Rudolf's reply. Since he is not a native English speaker, I have put brackets around slight grammatical corrections, and I have broken up his "Letter to the Editor" into more Internet-friendly paragraphs.
Other than that, here is a glimpse of Germar's young, incisive mind:
Dear friends,
the British Newspaper "The Independent" was so independent (as) to reprint the smear of the Sunday Telegraph on Monday, 18.10.1999, p. 5.
See some comments on these articles (below).
Still alive and free
Germar
===================
Correction
Re.: "German neo-Nazi fugitive is found hiding in Britain", by Jessica Berry and Chris Hastings in The Sunday Telegraph, 17.10.1999
Following is a draft of my reaction to the above article:
1. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong labelling me "a neo-Nazi". I never was (a) member of, or otherwise involved in, a neo-Nazi organisation, nor did I ever hold political views which are even close to Nation(al) Socialism. In fact, I am a patriotic conservative with strong libertarian convictions.
2. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong stating that I am "hiding in Britain". Since my arrival here in 1996, I never hid the fact that I am in the country. In fact, all my correspondence, both per letter and per email, bears a British address. I am a registered citizen paying tax like everybody (else). I simply hide from the press in order to avoid articles like the one criticized here.
3. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong stating that "Police in Germany have been looking for him ever since he left his home in Stuttgart". In fact, the German Police never tried to get hold of me. Though they knew where I lived since spring 1997 - they found my postal address when searching the home of my parents-in-law in Germany - they did not do anything about it.
4. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong stating that I "use" my "former wife's maiden name of Scheerer". In fact, my surname is Scheerer.
5. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong stating that I have "forged links with far-Right extremists including members of the National Front and the British National Party" and that "I have met leading members of the National Front". I never was knowingly in contact with a member of the National Front, and my links with Nick Griffin, now president of the BNP, were not "forged" by me for him being a "far-Right extremist". In fact, I got in contact with Nick Griffin in 1997 as a journalist, because I wanted to report about him being prosecuted for "Holocaust denial" in my periodical.
5. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong stating that I have said "I am not a total apologist for the Nazis". In fact, my business is not to apologize for what happened or did not happen in Germany 60 years ago, but to try to bring historiography into accord with the facts.
6. The Sunday Telegraph is wrong stating that I was "expelled from [my] university course". In fact, after having been convicted for a "thought crime", the University of Stuttgart refused to accept my PhD-thesis by referring to a 1939 law introduced by Adolf Hitler which allows German universities to withdraw and withhold academic titles in case of "lack of academic dignity".
=====================
Letter to the editor:
It is interesting to see how different the article by Chris Hastings is from what he promised me it would look like.
When interviewing me, he was very curious about the situation in Germany regarding freedom of speech. We were talking about the fact that
* there are 10,000 criminal prosecutions for "thought crimes" in Germany each year, as published by the German authorities;
* that German universities can and do withdraw PhD-titles from people (who commit) "thought crimes" (based) on a law introduced 1939 by Adolf Hitler, which is still valid today;
* that Germany's biggest Police department is the one called "Department for State Protection", the new German Gestapo;
* that Germany employs especially trained, politically reliable public prosecutors to do nothing but prosecute political cases, most of them being "thought crimes";
* that every German law court has departments called "State Protection Chambers" admittedly conducting nothing but political trials against all sorts of "political crimes";
* that the German Federal Police compiles a secret list of publications which (are) prohibited in Germany by any law court;
* that the German authorities burned many thousands of books and other publications in the last years for allegedly breaching German anti-discrimination laws, even if German professors testified on trial that some of these books are scientific and should be protected by the internationally guaranteed human rights.
I offered Mr. Hastings hard evidence for these things. He chose to stay silent. In fact, he decided to support those forces which want to introduce similar laws and conditions in Britain.
Did Britain fight two World Wars and sacrifice its empire in order to end up in a unified Europe that is being ruled by German political paranoia?
Germar Scheerer, Hastings, 19th October 1999
=====
Thought for the Day:
"What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil." -
(Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920)
Back to Table of Contents of the Oct. 1999 ZGrams